plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20557 stories
·
19 followers

Canada's emissions reductions slowed in 2024, federal data shows

1 Comment
The latest annual account of greenhouse gas emissions shows Canada's emissions reductions slowed in 2024 to almost nothing.
Read the whole story
sarcozona
49 seconds ago
reply
Thanks carney
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

The Prescient Parable of ‘Radioactive Emergency’ | The Tyee

1 Share

Amid all the post-apocalyptic dreck offered on Netflix, a new Brazilian miniseries stands out as a truly frightening horror story. It’s made more so because it’s based on a real incident that affected real people almost 40 years ago, in 1987. Far from being dated, Radioactive Emergency is a parable for our own times.

Watch the trailer for Radioactive Emergency, a 2026 Netflix miniseries that closely follows the worst radiation disaster not caused by a nuclear reactor.

Following historical events closely, the series begins in a working-class, mostly Black neighbourhood in the city of Goiânia, capital of the Brazilian state of Goiás.

Two young men dig a heavy metal tank out of the rubble of an abandoned radiotherapy clinic. They take it to a local junkyard, where the owner bargains good-naturedly with them (they need money for new soccer boots) and finally buys the tank.

That starts a sequence of disasters. From the abandoned radiotherapy clinic, a few grams of cesium-137, a radioactive isotope, move to the junkyard, then across the city — and then all the way to São Paulo, one of the biggest cities in South America.

By chance, a young physicist, Márcio (Johnny Massaro), and his wife are visiting his father in Goiânia. One morning, the next-door neighbour, a doctor, calls Márcio and invites him to look at some perplexing new cases in the local hospital. That leads in turn to a quietly frantic search across the city, tracking the path of the cesium-137 and the people, places and objects it’s contaminated.

Márcio and Dr. Orenstein (Paulo Gorgulho), the head of the national agency for nuclear radiation, push the search while trying to explain to the radiation victims, health-care workers, and politicians that they’re dealing with a threat never seen before.

Nothing like Chernobyl

The Chernobyl Power Plant in the Soviet Union, later Ukraine, disastrously exploded just the year before and everyone’s heard something about it. But that was an enormous nuclear reactor complex, and this radioactive isotope in Brazil is just a handful of powder that glows blue in the dark.

The longer the search goes on, the more contamination the searchers find. The canister containing the cesium-137 sits in the living room of the junkyard owner for days before his wife takes it to a hospital — where it ends up sitting on a chair in a courtyard.

Márcio, Orenstein and their technical helpers understand how serious the problem is, but no one wants to be told they have to leave their homes and live in tents in the municipal stadium until they can be tested for radioactive contamination.

The state governor is alarmed at what the contamination will do to the local economy and his own reputation. It’s not explicit, but Brazilian viewers would know very well that the 21-year rule of a military junta had ended just two years before. The contamination makes civilian government look incompetent.

The contamination also behaves very much like an infectious disease — COVID-19, for example. As Márcio and his colleagues trace radiation across the city, they also frighten everyone they meet.

We, the viewers, are already frightened to the edge of horror. We watch people laughing around a kitchen table as they play with the powder. They carry the canister onto a crowded bus. We watch a little girl eat a snack with powder on her hands.

As in a nightmare, we see awful things but we can do nothing.

Actor Johnny Massaro wears a light blue button-down shirt over a white T-shirt. He has dark curly hair and he is standing in the centre of the frame among bleachers, frowning. Around him are people standing or seated, looking concerned. Brazilian actor Johnny Massaro stars in Radioactive Emergency. He plays Márcio, a young physicist who teams up with a local doctor to track down the mysterious source of radiation poisoning in the city of Goiânia, Brazil. The show is based on real events that occurred in 1987. Still from Radioactive Emergency trailer.

‘Calma! Calma!’

In a feat of detective work, Márcio finds the bus that carried the canister to the hospital, climbs aboard with his Geiger counter, and learns the bus is very much contaminated, and so are all the passengers.

They panic when he tells them they must be screened at the stadium. All Márcio can do is shout “Calma! Calma!” In other words, take it easy. He is talking to himself as much as to the passengers.

The series pivots around a key issue: the experts don’t know how to talk to the people, and can’t even agree among themselves. A Soviet radiation expert, brought in to help, only quarrels with the Brazilians.

Meanwhile, healthy relatives of those exposed to radiation find themselves forbidden to go home or to work. They are stigmatized and shunned by friends and neighbours.

Problems like this have occurred in every recent serious outbreak of an emerging disease.

In the West Africa Ebola outbreak, young men in one town threw rocks at health-care workers, thinking they were bringing the disease.

In another case, villagers murdered eight health-care workers, journalists and government officials who had come to warn them about Ebola.

Ordinary people in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone had no particular reason to trust their governments or foreign experts; they associated hospitals with death, and preferred seeking help from local healers (who died treating Ebola cases, and whose elaborate, crowded funerals spread the disease even further).

One of the radiation cases in Goiânia is hospitalized but escapes — again reminding us of more recent Ebola outbreaks — and is nearly shot before being returned. When the local hospital can’t help the most serious cases, Dr. Orenstein pulls strings to get them transferred to a naval hospital in Rio de Janeiro — but the admiral in charge won’t provide enough beds for all, so the local doctors face an ethical dilemma in choosing who can go.

The disaster also exposes sloppy governance and lack of regulation. Embarrassing facts emerge from a hearing. The radiotherapy clinic was treating cancer patients for free, and had run out of money.

Quarrels arose about the clinic’s lease and money owing to local businesses, and somehow the cesium-137 canister was never recorded as being part of the clinic’s equipment.

And no one had established any guidelines for dealing with radioactive contamination on such a scale.

Men in military uniforms and berets stand in the grass of a soccer stadium as people arrive by ambulance at night. In a nightmarish scene from Radioactive Emergency, people are taken to the local stadium for radiation testing. Still from Radioactive Emergency trailer.

A critique of Bolsonaro

It’s likely that Radioactive Emergency is a critique of the Brazilian response to COVID-19 under the reactionary rule of then-president Jair Bolsonaro. He consistently minimized the pandemic, which caused an estimated 38 million COVID-19 cases and over 700,000 deaths.

image atom
Why the P1 Variant Poses So Great a Threat to BC
read more

The series succeeds because it mostly avoids the easy thrills of melodrama. The working-class people who are exposed to cesium-137 are simply trying to make a living in a rundown community like those I saw in 1950s Mexico when I was a boy.

The doctors and experts feel trapped between their knowledge and their ignorance. The politicians are appalled at what they must do: isolate thousands of people, hospitalize hundreds, demolish homes — and help to create policies to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.

By understating the disaster, the series lets us draw our own conclusions and compare our own communities with Goiânia.

One of its most powerful moments, near the end, shows a woman who has lost her child to radiation poisoning. Returning to her old house to watch it being demolished, she stands very still, her face a blank. We know what she is feeling, because we feel it ourselves.

‘Radioactive Emergency’ is now streaming on Netflix.  [Tyee]

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 minute ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Home Office ‘red flag’ error leaves German mother separated from toddler in UK | Home Office | The Guardian

1 Share

A German woman has been separated from her two-year-old daughter in Edinburgh after a Home Office mistake left her stranded in Dusseldorf earlier this week.

Liza Tobay, who has lived in the UK for 15 years, had taken her oldest child, a six-year-old boy, to visit his grandfather and some other relatives over Easter when confronted with what she said appeared to be “a serious administrative error”.

She is one of millions of EU citizens who, before Brexit, could just use their passport at the border, but must now prove they have “settled status” to enter the country as a lawful resident.

The first she knew of the error in the UK system was during her return on Wednesday when she tried to make a connecting flight from Munich to Edinburgh during a layover in Dusseldorf.

When she presented her passport, the border official told her they had been trying to reach her as her settled status had been “red flagged” and she and her son would not be allowed on the connecting flight.

She said she could prove she had settled status via an email but was told she could only do this through a phone app, which she did not have.

Tobay said: “I started to panic and my son started to cry. It is the first time he’s been away for five days without his dad, so he’s been homesick already and could sense something wasn’t right.”

She said she had been “up all night” researching what she could do but was unable to log into the Home Office website to see what the “red flag” was showing with her immigration status.

After resetting and logging in again, she could see the passport number recorded for her was completely wrong.

The next day, she phoned the Home Office EU settlement scheme resolution centre, and was told a “ghost number” had appeared on her account.

“He could see the photo of my passport but could see the system had generated a completely random passport number, different from the one in the picture,” she said. “They told me they are escalating it and it is to be given priority but that it might take three weeks.”

Tobay said it meant she could be away from her two-year-old for up to a month.

She said: “This situation is extremely distressing for our family. It is just awful. I haven’t slept, I haven’t eaten, I am just in shock, in autopilot trying to stay calm and do what I can to get home.

“I told them: ‘No, this is not OK, you are separating me from my child.’ I have never been away from her before now.”

She has booked a flight for Sunday but fears the Home Office will have not rectified its mistake by then.

The grassroots campaign group the3million, which has long objected to the digital immigration status, said her case was not isolated, and the length of time the Home Office took to resolve issues was “unacceptable”.

Tobay’s case has highlighted the risks of the UK’s decision to use a digital-only verification system to show immigration status, to which many objected.

The3million has said EU citizens living lawfully in the UK since Brexit should have a card or a QR code in an app to show authorities rather than having to log into a computer system.

Monique Hawkins, the head of policy and advocacy at the3million, said: “The Home Office insists a digital status cannot be lost, stolen or tampered with. We have long objected to this empty catchphrase as we keep being contacted by people suffering serious impacts from non-functioning eVisas.

“The level of error is unacceptable, but what’s worse is how long people sometimes have to wait before their problem is fixed. To add insult to injury, the Home Office denies all liability for the losses people face from eVisa errors.”

The Home Office said it had reviewed the case and been in touch with Tobay.

“The issues raised have now been resolved and there are no wider issues around the system,” it said.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
35 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

North Sea flood of 1953 - Wikipedia

1 Share
31 January–1 February storm surge
North Sea flood of 1953
Aftermath of the flood in Oude-Tonge, Goeree-Overflakkee, Netherlands
Meteorological historyDuration31 January – 1 February 1953 Overall effectsFatalities2,551Damage9% of total Dutch farmland flooded, 187,000 animals drowned, 47,300 buildings damaged of which 10,000 destroyedAreas affectedthe Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom Synoptic chart at midnight 1 February 1953

The North Sea flood of 1953, also known as the Big Flood or East Coast Flood (in England)[1][2] or as the Flood Disaster (Dutch: Watersnoodramp), was a flood caused by a heavy storm surge in the North Sea that struck low-lying coastal areas of the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom. More than 2,000 people were killed on land and hundreds more at sea.[1] It was the worst natural disaster of the 20th century in the United Kingdom and the worst in the Netherlands since the Middle Ages.[3]

The storm and flooding occurred during the night of Saturday, 31 January to the morning of 1 February 1953. A combination of a high spring tide and a severe European windstorm caused a storm tide of the North Sea. Most sea defences facing the surge were overwhelmed, resulting in extensive flooding. The combination of wind, high tide, and low pressure caused the sea to flood land up to 5.6 metres (18 ft 4 in) above mean sea level.

Realising that such infrequent events could reoccur, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom carried out large studies on strengthening of coastal defences. The Netherlands developed the Delta Works, an extensive system of dams and storm surge barriers. The UK constructed storm surge barriers on the Thames Estuary and on the Hull where it meets the Humber Estuary.

At the time of the flood, 20% of the land of the Netherlands was below mean sea level (subsequently, with the expansion of Flevoland, this proportion has increased), and the next-highest 30% sat at less than 1 metre (3.3 ft) above sea level. Such land relies heavily on sea defences and was worst affected, recording 1,836 deaths and widespread damage. Most of the casualties occurred in the province of Zeeland.[4]

In England, 307 people were killed in the counties of Lincolnshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex. Nineteen were killed in Eastern Scotland.[citation needed]

Twenty-eight people were killed in the north of West Flanders, Belgium.[5]

More than 230 deaths occurred on seacraft along Northern European coasts as well as on ships in deeper waters of the North Sea. The Stranraer–Larne car ferry MV Princess Victoria sank in the North Channel east of Larne with 134 fatalities, and many fishing trawlers sank. Nine small vessels foundered in the seas around the British Isles with the loss of all hands; these included the Swedish steamer Aspo (22 crew lost),[6] the British steamer Yewvalley (12 crew lost),[7] the British trawlers Sheldon (14 crew lost),[8] Michael Griffith (13 crew lost)[9] and Guava (eleven crew lost),[10] the Dutch motor vessels Salland (nine crew lost)[11] and Westland (eight crew lost),[12] the Dutch trawler Catharina Duyvis (16 crew lost),[13] and the Belgian trawler Leopold Nera (five crew lost).[14]

video iconExternal videos "Eerste beelden van de stormramp" [First images of the storm] parts 1, 2 & 3Polygoon newsreel, 1–2 February 1953. Collection of Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. 1953 was the first time video was able to record the aftermath of a major flood.[15]

From midday on 31 January 1953, water was driven from the northern reaches of the North Sea between Norway and Scotland by a strong northwest gale. A storm surge developed along the coast of the Netherlands, which coincided with a high spring tide, leading to many water levels on the Dutch coast on the morning of 1 February 1953 being higher than any previous recorded figures, particularly in the southwestern areas of the country.[16] At 10:30 p.m. on Saturday evening 31 January, it was low tide but, this time, the water remained high. The strength of the hurricane had broken the tidal movement.[17]

On the night of 1 February 1953 around 3 a.m., many dykes in the province of Zeeland and adjacent areas of South Holland and North Brabant proved unable to resist the floodwaters. On both islands and mainland, large areas of the country were flooded.[17]

At 4 p.m. on 1 February, the flood reached a second high. The water rose even higher than during the first flood, and more dykes broke. Many people who had survived the first flood died, as the houses whose rooftops they had sheltered on collapsed due to the persistent water pressure. At that time, the government did not yet know that Schouwen-Duiveland, Goeree-Overflakkee and Tholen were almost completely under water, and no large-scale rescue operations had yet taken place.

Only on Monday 2 February were fishermen the first to sail deep into the disaster area to save hundreds of people. Rescue operations from the air were hardly possible: the Netherlands had only 1 helicopter and had to wait until other countries offered help.[17]

On Tuesday 3 February, a large flow of people and relief supplies started. Planes dropped sandbags, dinghies, boots, food and water over the disaster area. At the same time, thousands of Dutch soldiers, administrators, aid workers and volunteers arrived to carry out coordinated actions in the disaster area. Tens of thousands of residents were being evacuated from the area to shelters elsewhere in the country.[17] Foreign helicopters and amphibious vehicles also came into action on Tuesday, but the vast majority of rescue operations had already been completed by then.

Donations and relief supplies were pouring in at the National Disaster Fund in The Hague. Other countries, including Britain, Sweden and Canada, sent more than 61 million guilders in relief supplies.[17]

Many people still commemorate the dead during the Herdenking Watersnoodramp on 1 February.[18]

Rijkswaterstaat had warned about the risk of a flood.[19] At the time of the flood, none of the local radio stations broadcast at night, and many of the smaller weather stations also only operated during the day. The following broadcast from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) was made at 6.15pm (18:15) on 31 January 1953 on Hilversum Radio:

Over the northern and western parts of the North Sea, a strong gale rages between northwest and west. The storm field is extending further. It is expected that the storm will continue for the whole night, and given this fact, this afternoon at 5.30pm the areas of Rotterdam, Willemstad and Bergen op Zoom have been warned for dangerous high water.

— "Hilversum Radio broadcast, Saturday January 31, 6.15pm", January 31, 1953 and 9/11: Living with risk (2019)[20]

Another warning was broadcast shortly before midnight on 31 January 1953, followed by the Wilhelmus, after which broadcasts ceased for the evening, as was standard in the Netherlands at the time.[21] As a result, the warnings of the KNMI did not penetrate the flood-threatened area in time. People were unable to prepare for the impending flood. The disaster struck on a Saturday night, and hence many government and emergency offices in the affected area were not staffed.

As telephone and telegraph networks were disrupted by flood damage, amateur radio operators went into the affected areas with their equipment to form a voluntary emergency radio network. These radio amateurs provided radio communications for 10 days and nights, and were the only people able to maintain contact from affected areas with the outside world.[22]

Extent of flooding in the Netherlands

The Zeeland dykes were breached in 67 locations.[19] Large parts of South Holland, Zeeland and North Brabant were inundated. In North Holland only one polder was flooded. The most extensive flooding occurred on the islands of Schouwen-Duiveland, Tholen, Sint Philipsland, Goeree-Overflakkee, the Hoeksche Waard, Voorne-Putten and Alblasserwaard. Parts of the islands of Zuid-Beveland, Noord-Beveland, IJsselmonde, Pernis, Rozenburg, Walcheren and Land van Altena were flooded, as well as parts of the areas around Willemstad, Nieuw-Vossemeer and parts of Zeelandic Flanders.

The highest death tolls were recorded on the islands of Schouwen-Duiveland and Goeree-Overflakkee. 305 people drowned in the village of Oude-Tonge. 20-year-old Jos de Boet from Oude-Tonge lost 42 family members in the disaster.[4] 200,000 animals died, 3,500 houses and farms were lost in the flood, and another 43,000 were severely damaged.[23][24]

Afterwards, the government formed the Delta Commission to study the causes and effects of the floods. They estimated that flooding killed 1,835 people and forced the emergency evacuation of 70,000 more. Floods covered 9% of Dutch farmland, and sea water flooded 1,365 km2 (527 sq mi) of land. An estimated 30,000 animals drowned, and 47,300 buildings were damaged, of which 10,000 had to be demolished (or were swept away). The total damage is estimated at 1 billion Dutch guilders.

Een dubbeltje op zijn kant ("A dubbeltje (small coin) on its edge", meaning 'a narrow escape'), a sculpture by Roel Bendijk of de Twee Gebroeders in the Groenedijk

The Schielands Hoge Zeedijk (Schielands High Seadyke) along the river Hollandse IJssel was all that protected three million people in the provinces of North and South Holland from flooding. A section of this dyke, known as the Groenendijk, was not reinforced with stone revetments. The water level was just below the crest and the seaward slope was weak.

Volunteers worked to reinforce this stretch. However, the Groenendijk began to collapse under the pressure around 5:30 am on 1 February. Seawater flooded into the deep polder. In desperation, the mayor of Nieuwerkerk commandeered the river ship de Twee Gebroeders ('The Two Brothers') and ordered the owner to plug the hole in the dyke by navigating the ship into it. Fearing that the ship might break through into the polder, Captain Arie Evegroen took a row boat with him. The mayor's plan was successful, as the ship was lodged firmly into the dyke, reinforcing it against failure and saving many lives.

The Afsluitdijk across the entrance of the Zuiderzee was said to have paid for its construction cost in that one night, by preventing destructive flooding around the three great lakes that used to be the Zuiderzee.

Several neighbouring countries sent soldiers to assist in searching for bodies and rescuing people. The United States Army sent helicopters from Germany to rescue people from rooftops. Queen Juliana and Princess Beatrix visited the flooded area only a few days after. A large aid program, the National Relief Fund, was launched, and soldiers raised funds by selling pea soup door to door. Internationally, 100,000 commemorative postcards, featuring an illustration by Eppo Doeve, were sold.[15] A national donation program was started and there was a large amount of international aid. The Red Cross was overwhelmed by contributions, and diverted some of the funds to assist residents of Third World countries.

It was found that the flooding could have been 4 feet (1.2 m) higher; the Rijkswaterstaat's plan concerning the protection and strengthening of the dikes was accepted.[19] As a result, authorization was granted for the Delta Works, an elaborate project to enable emergency closing of the mouths of most estuaries, to prevent flood surges upriver.

A breach at Erith after the 1953 flood

The North Sea flood of 1953 was the worst flood of the 20th century in England and Scotland. Over 1,600 km (990 mi) of coastline was damaged,[25] and sea walls were breached in 1,200 places,[26] inundating 160,000 acres (65,000 ha; 250 sq mi).[25] Flooding forced over 30,000 people from their homes,[25][26] and 24,000 properties were greatly damaged.[27][26] The damage is estimated as £50 million at 1953 prices, approximately £1.2 billion at 2013 prices.[25]

Probably the most devastating storm to affect Scotland for 500 years, the surge crossed between Orkney and Shetland. The storm generated coastal and inland hazards, including flooding, erosion, destruction of coastal defences, and widespread wind damage. Damage occurred throughout the country, with 19 fatalities reported.[28] The fishing village of Crovie, Banffshire, built on a narrow strip of land along the Moray Firth, was abandoned by many, as large structures were swept into the sea.

The surge raced down the east coast into the mid-to-southern North Sea, where it was amplified by shallower waters.

Illustration of the flooded areas in England

Canvey Island in Essex was inundated, with the loss of 58 lives.[29] Some 41 people died at Felixstowe in Suffolk when wooden prefabricated homes in the West End area of the town were flooded.[30] Another 37 died when the seafront village of Jaywick near Clacton was flooded.[31]

In Lincolnshire, flooding occurred from Mablethorpe to Skegness, reaching 3 kilometres (2 miles) inland. Police Officers Charles Lewis and Leonard Deptford received George Medals for their part in rescue work. Lewis leapt from a police station upper window to save an elderly couple being swept away in 3 feet (1 m) of floodwater, carrying them to a house across the road to safety, then continuing rescue work for hours until he found a working telephone to call for help. Deptford was off-duty at his son's party when the wall of water hit. He realised that elderly people were vulnerable as the sea wall was breached and he dragged and carried many to safety. At one house he found a bedridden elderly couple with their middle-aged daughter; in the waist-high floodwater, he lashed together oil cans to make a raft, to which he tied the couple and pulled them to safety. He carried on into daylight, his last rescue being a dog.[32]

Reis Leming, an American airman, and United States Air Force Staff sergeant Freeman A Kilpatrick were also awarded the George Medal for rescuing respectively 27 and 18 people at South Beach, Hunstanton.[33][34] At Salthouse the Victorian Randall's Folly was badly damaged, resulting in its subsequent demolition.[35]

In south-west Essex, water overspilled the Royal Docks into Silvertown, where it drained into the sewers but flooded back in Canning Town and Tidal Basin. William Hayward, a night watchman at William Ritchie & Son, died of exposure to gas from a damaged pipe – the only fatality in London. Almost 200 people were homeless and took refuge at Canning Town Public Hall.[36] The village of Creekmouth on Barking Creek, the mouth of the Roding, was wholly flooded by the sea surge and later demolished. Residents were relocated elsewhere in Barking.[37]

The total death toll on land in the UK is estimated at 307. The total death toll at sea for the UK, including the 135 lost in the sinking of MV Princess Victoria, is estimated at 224.[38]

Affected areas of Flanders

The coastal defences of Flanders were severely damaged. Near Ostend, Knokke and Antwerp, heavy damage was done to the sea defence with local breaches. Twenty-eight people died.

After the 1953 flood, governments realised that similar infrequent but devastating events were possible in the future. In the Netherlands the government conceived and constructed an ambitious flood defence system beginning in the 1960s. Called the Delta Works (Dutch: Deltawerken), it is designed to protect the estuaries of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt. The system was completed in 1998, with completion of the storm surge barrier Maeslantkering in the Nieuwe Waterweg, near Rotterdam.

In the UK, the Permanent Secretary to the Home Office, Sir Frank Newsam, coordinated the immediate efforts to defend homes, save lives and recover after the floods. After the flooding, the government made major investments in new sea defences. The Thames Barrier programme was started to secure Central London against a future storm surge; the Barrier was officially opened on 8 May 1984. A range of flood defence measures were initiated around the UK coast.

Blue plaque in Leigh-on-Sea commemorating the flood

In 2013, a service was held at Chelmsford Cathedral to mark the 60th anniversary of the Great Flood, attended by Anne, Princess Royal. Acts of remembrance were also held in Lincolnshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex.[39]

A blue plaque marking the level of the flood water was installed by the Leigh Society on the wall of the Heritage Centre in Leigh-on-Sea to commemorate the flooding there.[40]

There is also a blue plaque marking the height of the flood water at Sutton-on-Sea in Lincolnshire.[41]

In 2011, 58 years after the flood, a service of remembrance was held outside the library on Canvey Island in Essex to unveil a plaque commemorating the 58 people who lost their lives on the island.[42]

The Watersnoodmuseum or Flood Museum in Ouwerkerk, Netherlands opened in 2001 as the "National Knowledge and Remembrance Centre for the Floods of 1953".[43]

  • The composition Requiem Aeternam 1953 by Douwe Eisenga was written as a commemoration of the flood.
  • The composition Noye's Fludde of 1958 by Benjamin Britten evokes the memory of the North Sea flood.
  • The Dutch public broadcasting foundation has made numerous documentaries about the North Sea Flood. Two have been adapted as English versions: The Greatest Storm and 1953, the Year of the Beast.
  • BBC Timewatch made a documentary about the North Sea flood of 1953, called The Greatest Storm. BBC Radio Four broadcast in 2023 an account of the flood and lessons learned, such as the Thames Barrier: Learning From the Great Tide - BBC Sounds
  • An episode of the ITV series Savage Planet featured the flood.
  • The 1953 floods were mentioned in detail in the drama film Flood (2007).
  • In 2009 a Dutch action drama titled De Storm (The Storm) was released.
  • In 2018 a Dutch documentary titled Stormvloed in De Schelphoek ("Storm surge in the Schelphoek") was released.
  • The book The Little Ark by Jan de Hartog, published in 1953, depicted the flood. It was adapted as a film by the same name in 1972.
  • The short story "The Netherlands Lives with Water",[44] by Jim Shepard, contains a passage describing the event.[45]
  • The 1976 book Oosterschelde, windkracht 10, by Jan Terlouw is the story of the flood in Zeeland, Netherlands. The first part describes the storm, while the second part describes the later conflicts about constructing the Delta Works.[46]
  • Penelope Fitzgerald, The Bookshop (1978), set in Suffolk in 1959, makes many references back to the 1953 flooding.
  • The 2012 non-fiction book, The Sugar Girls, by Duncan Barrett and Nuala Calvi, describes the effects of the flood in East London, and on workers at Tate & Lyle's East End factories.
  • The flood and its effect upon the coastal town of Lowestoft is the subject matter of a painting by British artist Mark Burrell.
  • 'The Great Tide' by Hilda Grieve (published 1959) gives a detailed description of every aspect of the flood in Essex. The author was an experienced historian, commissioned by the Essex County Council.
  1. ^ a b Gerritsen, Herman (15 June 2005). "What happened in 1953? The Big Flood in the Netherlands in retrospect". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 363 (1831): 1271–1291. doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1568.
  2. ^ Tregaskis, Shiona (31 January 2013). "Devastation on England's east coast after 1953's 'Big Flood' – in pictures". the Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 23 August 2025.
  3. ^ "The Battle of the Floods". blogs.bl.uk. Retrieved 23 August 2025.
  4. ^ a b "Watersnoodramp herdacht: 'Getallen zeggen iets, verhalen zeggen alles'". nos.nl (in Dutch). 1 February 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
  5. ^ "The devastating Storm of 1953". The History Press. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
  6. ^ "Aspo". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  7. ^ "Yewvalley". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  8. ^ "Sheldon". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  9. ^ "Michael Griffith". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  10. ^ "Guava". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  11. ^ "Salland". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  12. ^ "Westland". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  13. ^ "Catharina Duvvis". <a href="http://www.wrecksite.eu" rel="nofollow">www.wrecksite.eu</a>. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  14. ^ Alan Villiers, Posted missing. The Story of Ships Lost without Trace in Recent Years, pp. 3 to 75
  15. ^ a b Komen, Lizzy (31 January 2019). "The Watersnoodramp: the Dutch battle against water in moving image". Europeana. Retrieved 31 January 2019. (CC BY-SA)
  16. ^ d'Angremond, K. (March 2003). "From Disaster to Delta Project: The Storm Flood of 1953". Terra et Aqua (90): 3–10.
  17. ^ a b c d e "Watersnood, een reconstructie van de watersnoodramp in 1953" [Watersnood, a reconstruction of the flood disaster in 1953]. lab.nos.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 February 2023.
  18. ^ "Herdenking slachtoffers watersnoodramp 1953, 66 jaar geleden" [Commemoration of the victims of the 1953 flood disaster, 66 years ago] (in Dutch). 1 February 2019. Archived from the original on 31 December 2022. Retrieved 31 December 2022.
  19. ^ a b c Ley, Willy (October 1961). "The Home-Made Land". For Your Information. Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 92–106.
  20. ^ Embrechts, P. (2019). "January 31, 1953 and 9/11:Living with risk". London School of Economics Public Lecture. Retrieved 31 December 2022.
  21. ^ Noyons, K. (2002). "De stemmen van de watersnood: Hilversumse Radio en de Zeeuwse Stormramp van 1953" [The voices of the flood: Hilversum Radio and the Zeeland Storm Disaster of 1953]. TMG Journal for Media History (in Dutch). 5 (2): 35–63. doi:10.18146/tmg.524.
  22. ^ Rollema, D. (2004). "Amateur Radio Emergency Network During 1953 Flood". Proceedings of the IEEE. 92 (4): 759–762. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2004.825908. S2CID 24008591.
  23. ^ Schreuder, Arjen (1 February 2023). "'Als we nu geen drastische maatregelen nemen, zullen we nog veel herdenkingen zoals deze nodig hebben'". NRC (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 February 2023.
  24. ^ Wismans, Laura (1 February 2023). "Er zit nog wel wat speling in de Deltawerken om de stijgende zee te keren". NRC (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 February 2023.
  25. ^ a b c d "1953 east coast flood - 60 years on". Met office. April 2013. Archived from the original on 15 March 2016. Retrieved 1 January 2019.
  26. ^ a b c The Flood of 1953 – The Open University OpenLearn, September 2004
  27. ^ Stratton, J.M. (1969). Agricultural Records. John Baker. ISBN .
  28. ^ Hickey, Kieran R. (2001). "The storm of 31 January to 1 February 1953 and its impact on Scotland". Scottish Geographical Journal. 117 (4): 283–295. Bibcode:2001ScGJ..117..283H. doi:10.1080/00369220118737129. S2CID 129865692.
  29. ^ Heatherson, Liam (1 December 2013). "Remembering the 1953 Floods on Canvey". Beyond the Point. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  30. ^ "Disaster victims to be remembered on floods tragedy anniversary". Ipswich Star. 4 January 2018. Retrieved 9 January 2018.
  31. ^ Grieve, Hilda (1959). The GreatTide: The Story of the 1953 Flood Disaster in Essex. Essex County Council.
  32. ^ "Queen Honours Men and Women - 1953 Flood". Liverpool Daily Post. 29 April 1953. p. 6. Retrieved 15 November 2023.
  33. ^ "Obituaries:Reis Leming". Daily Telegraph. 18 November 2012. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  34. ^ "Tributes paid to forgotten hero, Freeman Kilpatrick, who saved lives in Hunstanton in 1953 floods". 25 September 2014. Archived from the original on 31 December 2018. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  35. ^ "Onesiphorus's Wealth and Folly!". Norfolk Tales, Myths & More!. 23 August 2020. Archived from the original on 23 May 2021. Retrieved 23 May 2021.
  36. ^ Duncan Barrett and Nuala Calvi (2012). The Sugar Girls. Collins. p. 191. ISBN .
  37. ^ "The Great Flood of 1953". Creekmouth Preservation Society. 31 January 1953. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  38. ^ "1953 east coast flood – 60 years on". Met Office. Retrieved 23 September 2014.
  39. ^ "Commemoration". BBC. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  40. ^ Text on the blue plaque on the wall of the Heritage Centre in Leigh-on-Sea.
  41. ^ "BBC Radio Lincolnshire - Melvyn in the Morning, 17/10/2012, East Coast Floods - Melvyn with John Monk in Sutton on Sea". BBC. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  42. ^ "Commemorating the North Sea Flood of 1953". Essex Explorer Magazine. Spring 2023. Retrieved 25 July 2023.
  43. ^ "National Monument". Watersnoodmuseum. Retrieved 15 August 2016.
  44. ^ "BASS 2010: Jim Shepard, "The Netherlands Lives With Water" | A Just Recompense". <a href="http://Sloopie72.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Sloopie72.wordpress.com</a>. 18 April 2011. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  45. ^ "Google Drive Viewer". Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  46. ^ nl:Oosterschelde; Windkracht 10
Read the whole story
sarcozona
41 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

A core GNOME maintainer has stepped down

1 Share

Christian Hergert, a Red Hat employee and a programmer who's been developing and maintaining several of GNOME's apps and libraries for more than a decade, announced today that he's no longer employed at Red Hat and will no longer maintain those GNOME projects.

Happening now

Hergert made a post on the Happenings in GNOME blog called "Mid-life transitions" where he explained that recent geopolitical changes have caused his him and his family to feel unsafe remaining in the United States. As an example of fear-instilling incidents, he recounted how a shooting that involved a US Customs and Border Patrol agent happened in a nearby city at the same time he was at a visa appointment.

He and his family have now received visas for France and will be leaving soon. "My next chapter is about focusing on family and building stability in our lives," Hergert said.

  • He wanted to continue working for Red Hat while living with his family in France, but the company behind the Red Hat Enterprise Linux and community-focused Fedora wouldn't allow it.
Post by @chergert@my.devsuite.app

He said this transition means he'll no longer be able to continue the GNOME development he had been pouring "beyond forty hours each week" into. That's a lot of commits.

Hergert listed all of the GNOME projects that he, until now, had been "roughly the sole active maintainer." Totaling over a dozen, they include the GtkSourceView editor, the Builder IDE, and Ptyxis, the default terminal emulator in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.

Zooming out

Why this transition matters: GNOME 50 only just arrived, and two major distributions—Fedora and Ubuntu—are releasing next week with GNOME part of their flagship desktop environments. Core components losing their sole maintainer puts the reliability of those desktops at risk.

My take: This is a reminder that many open source projects exist only because of the good will of a single person spending overtime doing thankless work.

  • It's also a reminder that threats to the freedom and safety of anyone, regardless of citizenship, has negative effects on all of us.

What's next

Hergert called in his blog post for new contributors to step up:

If you or your organization depend on this software, now is a good time to get involved. Perhaps by contributing engineering time, supporting other maintainers, or helping fund long-term sustainability.

You can donate to the GNOME project if you want, though there are many worthy open source projects out there. I also recommend fighting for the dignity and safety of all families in every country.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Hospitalization rates for illnesses like COVID, flu have doubled since pre-pandemic, report finds | CBC News

1 Share

Years after the virus that causes COVID-19 kicked off a global pandemic, it’s still sending thousands of Canadians into hospital each year alongside other respiratory infections — despite a suite of vaccines that can slash someone’s risk of serious illness.

Striking new data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) shows hospitalization rates for vaccine-preventable respiratory diseases more than doubled in 2024 compared to pre-pandemic levels, all while vaccination rates are backsliding.

There were 142 hospitalizations for every 100,000 Canadians that year, the data shows, up from roughly 66 per 100,000 in 2019. 

The CIHI team tallied up nearly 60,000 vaccine-preventable respiratory hospitalizations country-wide for 2024 and found that, together, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) accounted for more than half, while COVID alone contributed to more than 40 per cent.

“People assume that COVID-19 is done … but what our data is showing is that it’s still having a big impact on our hospitals,” said Mélanie Josée Davidson, director of CIHI’s health system performance division.

Dr. Fahad Razak, an internist at St. Michael's Hospital in downtown Toronto who was not involved in the report, said the data highlights how much COVID has added to the existing burden of viruses like influenza and RSV, which became the latest vaccine-preventable respiratory infection after Canada approved new RSV shots in recent years.

“And for the most susceptible ... this leads to thousands of hospitalizations every year,” Razak said, adding it also represents a “missed opportunity” to protect Canadians and the health-care system if vaccination rates could be increased.

Drop in vaccine uptake among older adults

High-risk age groups are bearing the brunt of respiratory hospitalizations, the CIHI data shows. 

One-fifth of the hospitalizations in the 2024 season were infants and young children, and nearly half were aged 75 and up.

“These are populations that we actually have to actively protect through immunization programs,” Davidson said.

Yet seasonal vaccination uptake for both COVID and flu shots has dropped. 

Federal figures suggest only 26 per cent of Canadian adults were vaccinated for COVID in 2024 — a dramatic drop from when shots were first rolled out mid-pandemic and lineups at vaccination clinics often spanned multiple city blocks.

As for older adults aged 65 and up, who are at a higher risk of serious illness from many respiratory infections, a little more than half reported getting a COVID vaccine during the 2024 to 2025 season, while only 63 per cent reported getting a flu shot.

“The decrease in influenza vaccination coverage compared to previous years is notable, and the drivers of this decrease are not clear,” notes the federal vaccination coverage report, released in late 2025.

Erlinita Cruz, 75, gets her first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine at Caboto Terrace, in North York, Ont., on March 11, 2021. Nurses from Humber River Hospital were on site as part of an initiative to vaccinate seniors in congregate living settings at home. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

McMaster University immunologist Matthew Miller attributes the backslide to “vaccine fatigue” in the wake of the pandemic.

While uptake is typically higher among seniors living in long-term care and other community dwellings — where vaccines are readily provided to ward off outbreaks — Miller said the onus to get to a pharmacy or primary care provider falls on the shoulders of older adults living in the community.

“The sad reality is that even for people who are very vaccine-accepting, the need to get regular boosters is an inconvenience, right? And sometimes people just forget,” he said.

“To be frank, it's not that they don't want to get vaccinated, it's just that they don't get around to it, and they get infected in the interim.”

In the last federal vaccine report, the main reasons for skipping a COVID or flu shot among surveyed adults were the perception of not being at risk — totaling 22 per cent of respondents — while 18 per cent said they simply didn’t get to it.

Razak stressed the need for strategies to combat misinformation and make it easier for people to access vaccination programs, particularly seniors, given the success of mobile immunization efforts during the early years of the pandemic.

All the medical experts CBC News spoke to agreed that staying up-to-date on any available shots should be top-of-mind for older adults in particular, as the vaccines remain their best bet to prevent severe outcomes like hospitalization, ICU admission, and death from various respiratory infections such as flu and COVID.

“You tend to have a shorter course [of illness]. You tend to be less sick. The likelihood of being hospitalized is lower,” stressed Dr. Alim Pardhan, chief of emergency medicine for Hamilton Health Sciences.

WATCH | Physicians remind public to get COVID vaccine:
New COVID-19 vaccines are set to be released this fall. As CBC's Johna Baylon reports, it comes as recent federal government data shows a gradual increase in COVID infections this August.

High costs of hospitalizations

The CIHI findings looked at not just COVID, influenza, and RSV, but also other vaccine-preventable respiratory illnesses such as chickenpox, diphtheria, measles, mumps, rubella, whooping cough, and two types of pneumonia.

The data didn’t note individual patients’ vaccination status, however.

That is a key limitation of the report, said Dr. Anand Kumar, a critical care physician in Winnipeg, who suspects the doubling effect in hospitalization rates seen by the CIHI team might actually be due to a rise in routine testing for viruses during respiratory illnesses. 

“That's also why you hear about hospital outbreaks a lot more too,” Kumar added. “It's not that we didn't have them before. We just weren't looking.”

CIHI acknowledged there have been improvements in virus identification, and more routine testing, since 2019. But the organization told CBC News the team also compared hospital admission trends for non-specified respiratory diseases, before and after the pandemic, and “found similar patterns of increased admissions.”

WATCH | Why you should get a flu shot, even if it's not a perfect match:
Mutations to some H3N2 strains might be mismatched to the current flu vaccine, but doctors explain why it’s still a good idea to get the shot.

Davidson also stressed the CIHI figures raise alarms about how overall vaccine uptake may contribute to rates of serious illness. Those hospital stays have a high price tag attached, she said, alongside the impacts on patients and their families. 

“If you're over 75 and you spend three weeks in the hospital, that can also have long-term consequences on top of your disease,” Davidson said. “But it is also hard for our systems, when we already know our hospitals are full.”

Between the spring of 2023 and 2024, the average cost per patient for a COVID hospitalization was nearly $29,000 and the average total length of stay, including intensive care admissions, was about 23 days. 

That’s more than double the length of stay and often double the cost of influenza-related admissions, notes the CIHI report.

Pardhan, from Hamilton Health Sciences, stressed that higher levels of respiratory illness also have a ripple effect throughout the entire hospital system: added patient volumes in the emergency department, more admissions, challenges offloading ambulances, and longer wait times for beds.

“COVID-19 and the flu are here with us all the time,” Davidson warned. “They weren’t just a blip that has gone away.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories