plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
19734 stories
·
21 followers

Southwestern Drought Likely to Continue Through 2100, Research Finds - Inside Climate News

1 Comment
Read the whole story
sarcozona
9 hours ago
reply
This was well known by 2010 - not just to climatologists, but ecologists and other scientists working in the region. Anybody acting surprised is trying to milk subsidies.
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Radio geeks say you can still get 'lost' DoD hurricane data • The Register

1 Share

With the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) set to shut down a key satellite data stream used in US hurricane forecasting, a group of amateur radio enthusiasts has stepped in with a decoder they say could fill the gap.

In June, the US Department of Defense (DoD) decided to remove access to data collected by the Special Sensor Microwave Imager Sounder (SSMIS) instrument for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP).

Although the end of the service was put back until August, the data loss is set to hinder hurricane forecasting by scientists in the US. One told The Register: "The SSMIS satellite [data] is extremely important; as a forecaster, I use them constantly. The microwave satellite imagery allows us to peer under the overcast of a storm, probing the inner structure of a tropical cyclone. It's especially important at night."

However, a group of amateur satellite and radio ham enthusiasts have pointed out that the data is still available, for those who know where to look. The community SatDump provides tools and data allowing users to access publicly available satellite streams. Lead developer and ham radio operator Alan Antoine said the US authorities were turning off the online distribution of real time data while the satellite passes over the US stations at Wallops Island, Virginia, and Fairbanks, Alaska.

However, with the correct receiver – a guide to the hardware is available online – anyone in the US can pull the data directly off the satellite. Although it is encrypted over the rest of the world, the data is not encrypted over the US and the poles, according to Antoine.

The only problem is using the data. Antoine said that with previously online, publicly available documents, and a bit of trial and error, it is possible to decode the data.

"Since we saw – like everyone else – the NOAA said that the SSMIS data would get cut off, and I knew you could still get it directly from the satellite, I decided to write the decoder so that if somebody wanted to still use it, they could," he said.

The decoder is now publicly available via SatDump's GitHub repository in the "verywip" branch, although users wanting to take advantage of the download might want to contact SatDump directly for more information.

However, not all the data NOAA once distributed can be accessed using the decoder, Antoine said. Thermal data is missing due to a lack of reference material needed to decode the signal.

"I don't have an actual documentation for SSMIS, so it's mostly reverse-engineered, which I can do. It's not perfect, but it's better than nothing. I don't know if anyone is actually using it yet, because I just published it, but it's pretty likely that at least some of them are going to be doing so, considering how much of an issue the lack of data is," he said.

The Register asked NOAA to comment. ®

Read the whole story
sarcozona
9 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Tech shocks to industry have only just begun

1 Comment
JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
11 hours ago
reply
The jobs aren’t coming back
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Replication of Quantum Factorisation Records with an 8-bit Home Computer, an Abacus, and a Dog

1 Comment
Read the whole story
sarcozona
11 hours ago
reply
That doesn’t seem very promising for the tech
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

NHS facing ‘absolutely shocking’ £27bn bill for maternity failings in England | NHS | The Guardian

1 Share

The NHS is facing an “absolutely shocking” £27bn bill for maternity failings in England, the Guardian can reveal, after a series of hospital scandals triggered a record level of legal claims.

Hundreds of babies and women have died or suffered life-altering conditions as a result of botched care in NHS trusts across the country in recent years, prompting the government to launch a “rapid” national inquiry.

Analysis of NHS figures shows the potential bill for maternity negligence in England since 2019 has reached £27.4bn – far more than the health service’s roughly £18bn budget for newborns in that time.

The number of families taking legal action against the NHS for obstetrics errors rose to a record of nearly 1,400 a year in 2023, double the number in 2007, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act.

Labour MP Paulette Hamilton, the acting chair of the Commons health and social care select committee, said the figures were “absolutely shocking” and represented a “devastatingly high number of deaths and injuries of mothers and babies”.

She added: “The words ‘eye-watering’ come nowhere near to describing the enormous financial cost of these cases to the NHS, arising from failings within its own provision of care.”

An NHS source said about half of the 1,400 claims a year may not result in compensation payouts, so the amount paid out would be lower. However, compensation only accounts for part of the total 27bn figure, a larger share being legal costs. In the past six years, the NHS has spent £24.6m on legal fees for claims that did not result in damages.

NHS Resolution, the organisation that handles negligence claims for the NHS trusts in England, recorded in its most recent annual report, published on Thursday, that the cost of settling all maternity-related claims was £37.5bn. This amounts to nearly two-thirds of its total £60bn clinical negligence liabilities bill, a sum described by senior MPs as “jaw-dropping”.

Jeremy Hunt, the former Conservative health secretary, said: “It should be a matter of national shame that we now spend more on maternity litigation than the total cost of running maternity services.”

Hunt said the NHS was still not doing enough to learn from mistakes and the biggest problem was that clinicians fear being sacked for admitting errors.

Jess Brown-Fuller, the Liberal Democrat hospitals spokesperson, accused the Conservatives of a “scandalous” neglect of maternity services.

She added: “The crisis in our maternity services is being laid bare through the trauma that so many families have to deal with. Now these figures are showing just how much damage it is causing to our health service.”

The £27.4bn figure is the estimated value of maternity claims arising out of incidents since April 2019. NHS Resolution said the figure could change as there is an average three-year gap between an incident and a legal claim, the most serious birth injuries resulting in payments made over several years – and sometimes for the duration of the child’s life.

The figures have been revealed amid growing alarm about the state of maternity care in NHS hospitals across England. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, last month ordered a national investigation into “failing” services for women and babies, following a series of scandals in Shrewsbury and Telford, Nottingham, Barrow-in-Furness, Leeds and elsewhere.

Inspections of 131 NHS maternity units across England classed as many as two-thirds as “inadequate” or “requires improvement” for safety between 2022 and 2024.

The Care Quality Commission, the healthcare regulator, said issues including staff shortages were “systemic” and “widespread”, with almost half of the 131 maternity units it reviewed performing below standard.

Hamilton said the state of maternity care in the UK was “completely unacceptable”.

Previously unreported FoI figures show the NHS paid out £134m in the nine years to March 2023 to the families of nearly 300 women and about 400 babies who died in NHS settings.

However, the biggest settlements were for clinical errors that resulted in severe long-term disabilities, for which the NHS is liable for the lifetime costs of the child’s care.

As much as £1.7bn was paid out over failures to respond to abnormal foetal heart rates and £1.55bn for failing to properly monitor second-stage labour between 2006 and 2024. A further £247m was paid out over birth defects owing to clinical negligence.

Natalie Richardson, a medical negligence solicitor for Patient Claim Line, said there had been a 79% increase in the number of birth and pregnancy cases the firm had taken on this year.

Leeds teaching hospitals NHS trust, whose maternity units were last month downgraded to inadequate over safety concerns, paid out nearly £72m in compensation due to 107 obstetrics failings in the nine years to March 2024 – including 13 fatalities and 14 stillbirths.

In the same period, Nottingham University hospitals NHS trust was ordered to pay nearly £60m for 80 clinical damages claims related to pregnancies – including seven deaths.

That trust is at the centre of a vast criminal investigation into suspected corporate manslaughter over the severe harm of potentially more than 2,000 babies and women.

The Department of Health and Social Care said it had inherited “an unacceptable situation where too many families are suffering from botched care” and the NHS is “paying billions for its mistakes, rather than fixing them”.

It added: “We are committed to breaking that cycle and providing mothers and babies with safe, compassionate care once and for all.”

NHS England said it was taking immediate steps to strengthen maternity services, including closer oversight of underperforming trusts. It added: “We recognise that too many women and families are not receiving the high-quality maternity care they deserve, and we are committed to changing this.”

NHS Resolution said: “The high cost of compensation arising in maternity comes from a small number of very serious incidents resulting in brain injury to a baby at birth. These incidents are devastating for families and reflect the need to make provision for lifelong and complex care needs.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
18 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Top central banker defends climate work after US pushback

1 Comment
JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
20 hours ago
reply
“A senior central banker has defended supervisors’ work on climate change after attacks from the US, and warned officials had previously “completely underestimated” the risks rising temperatures pose to the financial system.”
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories