plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20857 stories
·
20 followers

Millions of fish tested Canada's largest nuclear plant. The incident points to a growing climate risk | CBC News

1 Share

Almost two years after a freak fish event at Canada's largest nuclear power plant "challenged reactor safety," newly obtained documents show how extraordinary the event was — as experts warn unusual ecological conditions are becoming a growing challenge for nuclear plants around the world.

In February 2025, millions of gizzard shad overwhelmed cooling systems at Bruce Nuclear Generating Station near Tiverton, Ont., shutting down one reactor, reducing power at another and leaving dead fish washing ashore along Lake Huron for days.

CBC News obtained more than 1,200 pages of federal and provincial records that reveal how an environmental phenomenon involving a small, cold-sensitive fish tested Canada's largest nuclear power plant in ways its operators had not anticipated.

Bruce Power, the private company that operates the plant, declined a broadcast interview. The company later provided a written statement, but did not answer CBC News's specific questions.

Dead fish 'challenged reactor safety'

Bruce Power's own root-cause investigation concluded the plant had encountered "a novel environmental event." Canada's nuclear regulator described an "uncharacterized and unanticipated volume of gizzard shad" — enough to overwhelm defences meant to keep fish out of the plant's cooling water system.

Gizzard shad gather beneath the ice in the warmer waters of Lake Huron by the millions near Bruce Nuclear Generating Station. The cold-sensitve fish seek out warm water refuges in winter, including the thermal discharge from the plant. (Zack Melnick/Inspired Planet Productions)

Another company investigation concluded in June 2025 that the two fish runs, on Feb. 1 and Feb. 13, "challenged reactor safety."

David Novog, a professor at McMaster University and Canada Research Chair in Nuclear Safety, said the phrase has a specific meaning in an industry where plants are protected by multiple layers of defence.

"When we talk about a challenge to reactor safety, what it usually implies is that one of those defences has been reduced in effectiveness or taken offline. And when that happens, nuclear power stations are required to shut down," he said.

There was no risk to reactor safety, in my opinion.- Douglas Boreham, former principal scientist and manager at Bruce Power

Douglas Boreham, a professor of medical sciences at Northern Ontario School of Medicine University who previously worked as a principal scientist and manager at Bruce Power, said the reactors responded as designed when their cooling systems were disrupted.

"Maybe the wording in that document should have been slightly modified to say it was operations that were impacted, but there was no risk to reactor safety, in my opinion," he said.

"There was no safety issue. I mean, it's designed to do that. You shut things down when the system isn't optimal."

Nuclear regulator warned of worst-case scenario

The potential consequences are laid out in an April 2026 report by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) prepared for the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The forebay at Bruce Power holds water drawn from Lake Huron before it enters the plant's cooling water system. Millions of gizzard shad congregated around Bruce A in February of 2025, with large numbers that became trapped and died in the intake system. (Bruce Power)

On Feb. 13, 2025, the mass cold-water fish die-off disrupted cooling systems serving two operating reactors. Bruce Power was forced to shut down Unit 2 and reduce power at Unit 1.

Less than two weeks earlier, on Feb. 1, the fish event affected cooling at Unit 4, which was already shut down for refurbishment. Even after a reactor is shut down, its fuel continues producing heat and must be kept cool.

In formal regulatory correspondence sent to Bruce Power on May 5, 2025, the CNSC warned that "the potential consequences of this event could have resulted in all [four Bruce A] units being shutdown."

8.1 million fish in a single day

The scale of the fish event was enormous.

In a March 2026 report to Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Bruce Power estimated that 8.1 million gizzard shad were in the vicinity of Bruce A on a single day in February 2025 — far exceeding any counts made public at the time.

A school of gizzard shad gathers in the warm water near Bruce Nuclear Generating Station in Lake Huron, near Tiverton, Ont. (Inspired Planet)

The report said severe winter conditions, including significant snowfall and a sharp drop in air temperature, pushed water temperatures close to freezing, causing cold shock among the fish. The surviving gizzard shad, a species poorly adapted to cold water, congregated around the warmer water discharged by the nuclear plant.

Ryan Lauzon, a fisheries biologist with nearby Saugeen Ojibway Nation, whose traditional territory includes the Bruce Peninsula and surrounding Lake Huron shoreline, co-authored a report on the 2025 fish kill. He said warmer winters in the years leading up to 2025 — including record-low ice levels in 2024 — may help explain how such a large population developed.

"It is a reasonable hypothesis," he said. "It potentially allowed these fish to develop larger populations" before colder conditions in 2025 left large numbers of fish vulnerable.

A dead gizzard shad lies on a Lake Huron beach. Large numbers of dead gizzard shad washing ashore in 2025 raised concerns about whether disease could be involved. (Lee Brintell/Facebook)

Federal records estimate between 3.8 million and 4.95 million gizzard shad became trapped and died at Bruce A between Jan. 30 and March 26, 2025 — several times the previous record of roughly 800,000 set in 1977.

The number was so enormous Bruce Power brought in a crane ito help remove them, according to emails obtained by CBC News from Ontario's Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. The carcasses were hauled to a landfill.

Reactor shutdown 'a big hit to the grid'

Novog said a reactor shutdown isn't simply a matter of clearing out the dead fish and flicking a switch. Restarting a reactor in Canada would take at least three or four days.

An aerial image of the Bruce Power site located near Tiverton, Ont. (Submitted by Chad Richards)

"That's not trivial. Each nuclear station is generating hundreds of megawatts of electricity every hour of the day, so to lose them for multiple days even, is a big hit to the grid," Novog said.

Internal provincial records obtained by CBC News show Ontario's Independent Electricity System Operator said the province's electricity supply was "tight" while Unit 2 remained offline. It assessed a "medium risk" that another Bruce reactor could go offline, but said the grid could remain reliable using electricity imports and other domestic generation.

Nuclear power's climate paradox

What happened at Bruce Power is not the only recent case of environmental conditions disrupting the cooling systems nuclear plants depend on.

The Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant in Romania, seen here next to Danube-Black Sea channel on September 3, 2025. Its Candu reactors depend on water from the river for cooling. In July 2026, severe drought brought the Danube to unprecedentedly low levels, forcing the plant to shutdown Unit 1 and later Unit 2 as a precaution. (Daniel Mihailescu/AFP via Getty Images)

Novog said he has seen such events become more common over the course of his career, pointing to events that disrupted nuclear cooling systems in Romania and France.

In the summer of 2026, reactors were forced offline by record-low water levels on the Danube River in Romania. At France's Gravelines nuclear plant, massive influxes of jellyfish clogged cooling systems for two consecutive summers, forcing reactors offline in 2025 and 2026.

Nuclear plants are being forced to adapt to a changing climate, even as governments increasingly rely on them to help fight it.

"It just appears to me that over time, these kind of events have been increasing," Novog said.

'Organizational failure' to adapt

Bruce Power's investigation identified inadequate real-time environmental monitoring and what it called an "organizational failure" to recognize emerging problems associated with changing environmental conditions and make design changes to protect the plant from cooling water blockages.

A few jellyfish lie on a beach near the Gravelines nuclear plant in northern France. In August, a massive influx of jellyfish clogged filters in the plant's seawater pumping stations, automatically shutting down four reactors. (Reuters)

Since the event, Bruce Power has said it spent nearly $10 million on mitigation measures and research aimed at preventing another mass fish event from disrupting the plant.

In a statement received after CBC News' deadline, Bruce Power said it has strengthened its defences since the fish event and is preparing for emerging risks associated with climate change, acknowledging that "we cannot anticipate every future event."

The measures include new physical barriers to keep fish away from the cooling-water intakes, underwater acoustic deterrents, sonar and video monitoring and an artificial intelligence system intended to provide earlier warning when large numbers of fish approach.

Novog said preventing those disruptions will become increasingly important as nuclear plants are relied upon to provide low-carbon electricity.

"The best solution is to have no fish congregate there and keep the units running and so that's why I think over the years to come, you'll see more on mitigation and prevention measures at Bruce and other stations around the world."

Read the whole story
sarcozona
57 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

The EPA Would Rather Monitor Water for Abortion Pills than Pollution – Mother Jones

1 Comment

US Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Lee Zeldin speaks during a press conference at the G20 Ministerial meeting on Energy Abundance, in Houston, Texas, on September 14, 2026.Photo by RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

With his characteristic deregulatory zeal, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced before an audience of G20 energy ministers in oil-rich Houston, Texas, that his agency would eliminate climate pollution standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants. “For over 15 years, the Obama and Biden administrations implemented a war on coal to destroy reliable and affordable energy,” Zeldin said in an EPA press statement issued during the Houston meeting. “The Trump Administration has come in to protect American energy and to make sure you can afford to keep the lights on.” 

This announcement was yet another example of the Trump administration’s eagerness to reinforce what Republicans have long considered a priority: freedom from government intrusion or regulation. But only a few days before Zeldin reassured energy executives that the government would no longer prioritize protecting public health, the EPA announced a new study that would test the country’s water supply for abortion medication, contraception, and hormones used in gender-affirming care, along with over 1,000 other medications and chemicals. “We have heard loud and clear that Americans are concerned about potential unknown pollutants lurking in their drinking water,” Zeldin wrote in the study press release.

“The Pro-Life Generation is finally being heard!”

The testing of abortion medication has been championed by anti-abortion groups for years, especially by Kristan Hawkins, the leader of Students for Life, who tweeted a video of herself receiving the news that the study was made public. In her post, she wrote: 

“BREAKING: The EPA will now test water for abortion pill pollution!! The FDA has recklessly, negligently allowed chemical abortion pills on the market and deregulated them. They’ve killed millions of babies, harmed mothers, and polluted our water for 26 years. For the last year, we’ve been calling on President Trump’s EPA to find out what’s in our water. After more than three years of innovative water testing, a peer-reviewed research paper, and the introduction of legislation in states, the Pro-Life Generation is finally being heard!”

The EPA’s unrelated but tandem announcements reveal an agency that has fundamentally overhauled its policies toward environmental and human health in pursuit of the Trump administration’s “energy dominance” and “Make America Healthy Again” agendas. Rolling back power plant pollution standards will lead to higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth’s warming to deadlier levels, as well as increased levels of smog, mercury, and lead contamination, which can cause health problems. 

Coal and natural gas-fueled power plants are the second-largest carbon polluter in the United States, behind the transportation sector. Under the Biden administration, carbon pollution rules for power plant emissions standards would have reduced carbon emissions by 1.38 billion metric tons by 2047. The recently announced plan will repeal these Biden-era regulations and could prevent future administrations from curbing carbon emissions. First reported by Bloomberg News, the EPA’s latest move caps off a year and a half of the agency’s overhaul of federal climate policy. In February, the EPA rescinded similar climate vehicle standards and the 2009 endangerment finding, the landmark ruling that asserted greenhouse gases threaten human health.

Much to the dismay of anti-abortion activists, the number of abortions in the United States has actually increased since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, which overturned the constitutional right to an abortion. One reason for this has been access to abortion medication, the two-drug regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol that act to terminate pregnancies. This has activated the anti-abortion movement to find new approaches to ending the procedure, and one of them has been environmental: focusing on the alleged presence of these medications in the water supply.

After Republican lawmakers urged the EPA to take up the water study in June, Nathan Donley, the environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, told The 19th that, compared to other pharmaceuticals, mifepristone is taken as a one-time dose by a small portion of the population. “There are legitimate water quality threats that we need to attack and rectify in a regulatory manner,” Donley said. “And then there are things that are out in left field that just distract people.” 

Meanwhile, monitoring the water supply—which Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wrote will “give Americans the truth about what is in their water”—may actually co-opt environmental policy to pursue anti-abortion policy. “I am deeply concerned,” Betsy Southerland, a former career scientist in EPA’s Office of Water, told Politico. “If there is any detectable level of mifepristone or its metabolites, the anti-abortion groups will scream that we are unknowingly aborting fetuses by drinking public tap water.” 

According to Politico, the EPA insists the study will only determine if a chemical is present in the water supply, not its concentration. But pro-choice activists caution that the study could still pave the way for abortion access restrictions. “If the test finds any trace of abortion pills, conservatives will use it to legitimize their new legal front in the war on reproductive rights,” wrote activist and writer Jessica Valenti on her Substack, Abortion, Every Day. “The cruelty really is the point here, not science or health.” 

As for the EPA’s other effort? Environmental groups are already planning their legal challenges to the EPA’s latest climate policy rollback. “The Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting,” Holly Bender, chief program officer for the Sierra Club, told The Guardian. “This is full-throated climate denial while the climate crisis happens in real time and a shocking betrayal of the American public.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
3 hours ago
reply
Well fuck
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

FBI warned ICE agents could be targeted by fake ‘tradwife’ dating profiles, memo reveals | FBI | The Guardian

2 Shares

The FBI internally warned that a group of women were creating fake online dating accounts with “tradwife” aesthetics in an effort to lure US immigration agents and “dox” them.

The FBI in Chicago disseminated a brief memo to other law enforcement officials across the US on the potential threat to agents in February, warning that “as of late January 2026, a small group of women allegedly were creating fictitious online dating profiles with the purpose of attracting and then doxxing law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement”. The report, which was shared with the Guardian, provided few details about the alleged scheme and did not explain the source of the information.

“These profiles were incorporating imagery of a ‘traditional wife’ aesthetic and listing specific interests in an attempt to appeal to … individuals in law enforcement,” the FBI continued. “The objective was to lure affiliated law enforcement personnel into an online or in-person interaction under the guise of a date, after which the individuals would be publicly exposed and doxed online. The tactic is intended to generate public embarrassment and deter immigration enforcement activity.”

Property of the People, a government-transparency non-profit, obtained the document through a public records request, one of many internal records the group has collected revealing internal law enforcement concerns about activists organizing against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The FBI’s “situational information report” did not list the dating sites allegedly used by the women or where they were located, nor did it specify whether agents had actually been exposed. The memo aimed “to raise awareness” about this doxing “technique”, the FBI wrote, adding a disclaimer that the report was “not finally evaluated intelligence”.

The FBI’s “tradwife” comments were a reference to the trend popularized in recent years by influencers promoting traditional gender roles, with women romanticizing domesticity. “Doxing” generally refers to publishing someone’s private information online without their consent, though the administration has used the term loosely, claiming doxing includes posting videos of officers.

The FBI declined to answer detailed questions about the memo, saying the bureau doesn’t generally comment on intelligence briefings. A spokesperson added in an email: “The FBI regularly shares information with our law enforcement partners to assist in protecting the communities they serve as well as protecting those who serve and protect communities. The FBI is committed to ensuring that law enforcement officers are safe from threats or violence while performing their duties.”

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to requests for comment.

The memo was sent weeks after the New York Post, a conservative outlet, ran a story saying that “lefty TikTokkers” were “orchestrating groups of women” to “chase dick picks and selfies of ICE agents in a twisted scheme to dox them”. That story cited Libs of TikTok, a rightwing account that had posted a screenshot of someone claiming to be part of a Facebook group dedicated to going on dates with agents to expose them. The article listed a handful of posts and videos from users discussing this tactic, though it did not include interviews with anyone who claimed to be duping agents and there was no evidence agents had been tricked.

The news coverage did not mention women using “tradwife” imagery, so it’s unclear whether the FBI may have received direct accounts from targeted agents or was simply summarizing social media trends.

“It’s absurd the FBI issued a thinly-sourced security alert about ICE agents’ online dating troubles,” Ryan Shapiro, executive director of Property of the People, said in a statement. “It’s equally ludicrous the FBI is spending taxpayer dollars to protect ICE agents from possible ‘embarrassment’ at the hands of a supposed ‘small group of women’ who might name and ridicule them online.”

Mike German, a former FBI agent and longtime civil liberties advocate, reviewed the document for the Guardian and said it was odd the briefing did not have footnotes or citations. The briefing said the intelligence came from a “collaborative source”.

“The rightwing echo chamber creates threats and the government’s intelligence apparatus just repeats those threats without any context, more detail or any instruction of how agents or officers should respond,” said German, arguing it seemed likely the briefing was inspired by the New York Post story. “They must have run out of other threats.”

The document, German added, “reinforces the paranoid ‘us versus them’ mentality within law enforcement”.

The briefing comes as US law enforcement has raised increasing alarms about officials, and ICE agents in particular, being “doxed”. More than a dozen internal law enforcement reports, obtained via records requests by Property of the People, include similar warnings about doxing.

An October 2025 report from the US army said there was “credible intelligence” that “cartels” had offered to pay gang members and others in the US to dox, assault or kidnap immigration officers. That report cited charges against a man accused of a murder-for-hire plot targeting a top border patrol leader, but the man was found not guilty months later.

In a November 2025 report, the FBI warned that AI, facial-recognition and automated data-scraping tools had “increased the scale and accuracy of doxxing attacks” targeting ICE officers. The alert said people had published ICE officers’ names, photos, license plates, locations and family details, citing various crowdsourced efforts by activists to report ICE sightings.

In a January 2026 New York police department “terrorism brief”, the NYPD warned of “violent rhetoric” and “extremist messaging” on social media after the killing of Renee Good, including “calls to ‘hunt down’, ‘dox’, and kill ICE personnel”. The report cited a small number of online posts that appeared to call for violence.

And a May 2026 alert from Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a branch of DHS, warned that smart glasses, which have cameras, could be used to surveil, record and potentially dox CBP personnel. A CBP spokesperson did not comment directly on the document, but said in an email that smart glasses “pose unique security and intelligence risks because of their ability to discreetly capture audio and video” and the agency continues to monitor technology trends. Property of the People shared records with the Guardian earlier this month showing law enforcement across the US have grown increasingly concerned that smart glasses could be used against officers.

Other law enforcement agencies that have raised concerns about ICE agents being doxed in internal records include the FBI in Los Angeles, the Amtrak police department, an Idaho law enforcement consortium, a Florida fusion center of local and federal agencies, and the Federal Protective Service, which is also part of DHS.

There can be safety concerns if agents’ home addresses or family information is exposed, and two activists were convicted of “stalking” in California after prosecutors said they followed an agent home and publicly disclosed the location.

But German argued law enforcement’s claims about doxing were misguided, noting that ICE officers are domestic servants, not “secret agents” whose identities must be shielded: “These are agents working on the public dime. The public has a right to know who they are and what their qualifications and training are.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
acdha
5 hours ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Fourth dead after infection with West Nile virus, patient infected by blood transfusion

1 Share

Het Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM) meldt dat er in Nederland een vierde dode is gevallen na besmetting met het westnijlvirus. Het gaat om een persoon die al ziek was en besmet raakte door een bloedtransfusie.

Volgens het RIVM is het niet duidelijk of het slachtoffer daadwerkelijk is overleden aan de gevolgen van het virus. Mogelijk was diens kwetsbare gezondheid de oorzaak van het overlijden.

De donor was iemand die ook besmet was met het virus, maar dat was op het moment van donatie nog niet bekend. Toen de bloeddonor positief testte op het virus, heeft bloedbank Sanquin dit bloed geblokkeerd, meldt persbureau ANP. Daardoor zou niemand anders dan het overleden slachtoffer het hebben ontvangen.

Het RIVM meldt daarnaast dat bij tien andere patiënten het westnijlvirus is vastgesteld. Het aantal vastgestelde besmettingen is daarmee in een week gestegen van 18 naar 28. Behalve de persoon die besmet raakte door een bloedtransfusie, raakte iedereen besmet door een beet van een mug.

Dit gebeurde in de provincies Utrecht, Noord-Brabant, Noord-Holland, Zuid-Holland, Overijssel en Gelderland. De besmettingen werden vastgesteld nadat de besmette personen met klachten in het ziekenhuis waren beland. Het RIVM schat in dat het aantal besmettingen in werkelijkheid veel hoger is.

Voor de meeste mensen (80 procent) is het westnijlvirus ongevaarlijk en levert het nauwelijks klachten op. Iets minder dan een op de vijf mensen krijgt griepachtige klachten zoals koorts, hoofdpijn en spierpijn. Het zijn vooral ouderen en mensen met een kwetsbare gezondheid die risico lopen.

Bij het westnijlvirus is besmetting van mens tot mens niet mogelijk. De meeste mensen lopen het virus op via muggen die zich hebben gevoed met bloed van vogels die het virus bij zich dragen.

Sinds de vorige update zijn dertig nieuwe positief geteste paarden gemeld. Daarmee komt het totaalaantal meldingen van paarden met westnijlvirus in 2026 op 88.

In totaal zijn er in 2026 nu 100 vogels met het westnijlvirus gemeld. Volgens het RIVM is vooral de hoge sterfte onder kraaiachtigen opvallend. Hoeveel kraaiachtigen zijn overleden, is niet duidelijk.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
7 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

What to know about self-harm as emergency room visits increase - CalMatters

1 Share

It had been four days since Jae Janea had spoken to anyone. The loneliness was setting in. Dark thoughts were becoming overwhelming. So on a summer evening last year she walked into a dollar store and bought a pack of razor blades. 

Janea went home and cut her wrists. She thought she was ready to go. Instead she called her best friend who told her to make a tourniquet. When her friend arrived, she helped bandage Janea’s wounds. The next morning they went to urgent care. 

“It was in that moment when I realized I don’t want to be gone. I just don’t want to feel this intense pain. I was trying to find a way to make it stop,” she said.  “But it was absolutely not the appropriate way. I wish I could tell myself differently then.”

Janea struggled with self-harm for many years before her suicide attempt.  Since then, Janea has put additional measures in place so she doesn’t find herself in that situation again. Amping up her therapy sessions, eating balanced meals, engaging in physical activity, and learning to create space between herself and her emotions. 

At times, she admits, she still feels the urge to harm herself. And the 22-year-old is not alone in her feelings.

National research shows emergency room visits connected to self-harm climbed through 2021, and the numbers remain elevated above pandemic-levels in California even as other indicators of mental distress have declined. In the California 2026 State of the Girl Report, nearly a quarter of grade 7 girls report self-harm. 

In a recent UC Berkeley analysis, researchers found an increase of multiracial adolescent girls being treated for self harm injuries in California hospitals. 

Overall the number of adolescents in the state engaging in self-harm is increasing, Emily Liu, lead author of the UC Berkeley report said. With the use of inpatient and emergency department hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2021, more than 70% were girls. By 2021, rates were highest among multiracial, white, and Black girls aged 15 to 19 years old.

California policymakers have paid close attention to youth mental health during Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration, including backing a voter-approved 2024 ballot measure that dedicated billions of dollars to building more capacity for treatment. Newsom also supported a $4.3 billion surge in funding for youth mental programs in the budget he signed in 2022. 

More recently the California Department of Public Health developed California’s Population-Based Prevention Program Final Plan with the goal of reducing suicide, self-harm, overdose, and behavioral health disparities.

But students and representatives from schools say gaps remain. Newsom vetoed bills in 2022 and in 2023 that would have further expanded youth mental health services. 

Shalini Mustala, a researcher at the Public Policy Institute of California, said at the legislative hearing that the rate of depressive symptoms and suicidality in teens has steadily risen since 2009. And hospitalizations for self harm, post COVID-19, still remain elevated.

“Ongoing evaluation of these investments will play an important role in refining strategies for effectively addressing student mental health needs,” Mustala said. 

Dr. Janis Whitlock, an emeritus research scientist at Cornell University who has studied self-injury for more than 20 years, said self-injury is a risk factor for suicide but it’s not the same thing.

Non-suicidal self-injury, often used interchangeably with self-harm, happens when someone repeatedly injures themselves to provide temporary emotional relief. The most common forms include cutting, scratching, and burning. 

Most people who self-harm do not end up in the emergency room. If an adolescent harmed themselves at school, oftentimes Whitlock explains, school protocol is to call 911 to report a suicide attempt. It’s unlikely an adolescent would voluntarily go to the hospital for self harm injuries. 

“Most of the time people who self-injure don’t want to end up in an ER,” she said. “That isn’t their goal. The goal is to feel better. The goal is to be able to function.”

Dawn L. Brown, president and CEO of EmpowHer, isn’t new to supporting teens who self-harm. The Los Angeles nonprofit works with Title 1 schools across the county and annually serves about 1,000 girls of color from low-income communities. 

Nationally, about 17% of teens report some form of self injury, but studies show an even higher risk among college students — with a range of 17-35%. Some of the top concerns girls are dealing with, Brown said, include the fear of school shootings, threats to body autonomy, immigration, and financial security. 

In the recent State of the Girl report from Girl Scouts USA, nonbinary students report the highest level of emotional distress with 61% reporting chronic sadness and more than half of grade 9 nonbinary students report self-harm. 

“So many of our girls are feeling this overwhelming sense that they are being attacked for who they are. We do have a large population of LGBTQIA+ youth,” she said. “I think that plays a big role as to why we’re seeing an increase of Black and Latina girls (self-harming) because they are being ignored and disregarded.”

There’s a strong link between self-injury and trauma. Although some studies show demographic differences in who self-injures based on ethnicity and socioeconomic status, Whitlock said the differences aren’t by a lot. Nationally, the data shows the rates of young girls self harming continue to increase.

Self-harm “absolutely is stigmatized as a white girl problem, historically it has not impacted us in the same way, but self-harm has always happened in the Black community,” Brown said. “From a cultural standpoint we tend to sweep those things under the rug, we don’t have open conversations about those things, the idea is … don’t put our business out there in the street.”

Janea describes her childhood as traumatic. As a biracial teen, she felt she didn’t always have the necessary support. Things really took a turn when she was 12. Her father tried to kill her mother and cousin. And attempted to kidnap her. He was later taken to prison.

Eight months later, at 13, she attempted suicide. 

While in the psychiatric hospital, she found it hard to be honest with her therapist. Around this time is when she started self-harming. In the years that followed, she was in and out of outpatient psychiatric care. 

But things “kept happening” in life and a strong sense of “hopelessness” was ever present. Plus she knew shutting down with her therapist wasn’t helping.

“I got sexually assaulted (at 15), that caused me to open up too because that made me feel very uncomfortable with myself,” Janea said. “Hearing those comforting and reassuring words from a therapist is what I needed to hear instead of what I was hearing from my family.”

Two years later, she was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. Something she frequently talks about on her Instagram page with more than 200,000 followers. Janea said she made the page so others don’t feel alone and to show the world “we are more than a label.”

There’s been a lot of ups and downs in her life. Like the death of one of her best friends and then her beloved dog. The grief was “a lot.” But Janea said leaning on her village, making new friends, and continuing to seek therapy has been critical to her recovery from her suicide attempt.

“There’s been a lot of behaviors that I had to ditch that no longer serve me. Even though they once fulfilled me at a younger age, they kept me safe or they kept me sane,” she said. “Now … I don’t need to keep it in my circle anymore. Being able to learn a different coping mechanism that can help me through those same intense feelings was helpful within my healing journey.”

Too often research on self harm is grouped in with suicidality. Many clinical databases, public health surveys, and screening tools don’t separate self-harm and suicide. However, there is a clear difference between the two. 

Dr. Jill Harkavy-Friedman, senior vice president of research at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, said people who self harm don’t have the intent to die. If someone harms themselves with the intention to end their life that would be considered a suicide attempt, she explains. Whereas the goal with self harm is to feel relief.

Decades ago, when Whitlock started her research there wasn’t much to build off of, she said. In 2004, she founded the Cornell Research Program on Self-Injury and Recovery, to explore the then nascent phenomenon now known as non-suicidal self-injury. Although research on this topic has increased, it’s still not commensurate with research on suicidality. 

Much of the data collected on self-injury rates come from self-reported surveys or in the case of Berkely, hospital discharge data. While more data is useful, Whitlock explains, there’s other underlying reasons people who self-injure don’t seek care.

A lot of people who self-injure and seek care have bad experiences with providers. “Doctors will say, ‘I can’t believe I’m taking up time to stitch you up after you did this to yourself,’” she said. Instead, Whitlock emphasizes to the providers she works with to lead with compassion and not judge. 

In the years Janea has sought care, she said, some providers called her “drug-seeking” after trying to get pain medication from her self-inflicted injury. Other therapists were more helpful. She encourages other young Black and Latina girls who are managing self-harm to not let provider comments become a deterrent to healing. Even when life feels heavy, she said, it’s worth it to hold on.

“You can absolutely become better after everything that you’ve dealt with.” she says to young girls like herself. “I’m accepting that these bad things have happened to me, but they don’t make up who I am as a person. I can continue (to) change the trajectory of my life.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
7 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

No New Jobs Came from Alberta’s $4B ‘Job Creation’ Tax Cut for Big Oil

1 Share

Canada’s biggest oil sands companies have benefitted to the tune of $4.3 billion since Alberta handed large corporations a ‘job creation’ tax cut three years ago, but those jobs never materialized, a new study has found.

Instead, a total of 3,452 jobs with oil sands majors were lost to automation and consolidation since 2019, concludes the report from the University of Alberta’s Parkland Institute. “Meanwhile, those same companies added millions of dollars to the compensation of their CEOs and rewarded their shareholders with generous dividends,” the institute says.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney’s United Conservative Party (UCP) government said 55,000 new jobs would be created, offsetting a projected $2.4-billion loss in revenue, from its plan to cut the corporate tax rate from 12% in 2019 to 8% by 2022. But three years later, and with the 8% tax cut delivered two years ahead of schedule via Alberta’s Recovery Plan, Parkland says that the boon to the corporate sector enriched the coffers of the oil sands “Big Four,” even as provincial revenues tanked by twice the projected amount. And 3,452 oil sands workers have been given pink slips.

“The oil sands majors have been cutting jobs on the front lines, but CEOs and shareholders have remained very well compensated,” said report author Ian Hussey, research manager at Parkland. Digging into the details, he found the CEOs of the so-called “Big Four”—Suncor Energy, Canadian Natural Resource Ltd.,, Cenovus Energy, and Imperial Oil, which account for some 86% of Canada’s oil sands production—have been enjoying an average annual pay raise of $2.35 million since the UCP corporate tax rate changed. The policy shift that left the “Big Four” alone $4.3 billion richer.

With that same amount, the government of Alberta would have had enough funds to add more than 10,000 new employees to its payroll in critical areas like health care and education, Hussey said.

The study found that shareholders have also been considerably enriched, with dividends in some cases totalling “more than twice the amount oil companies paid the province in royalties.”

In 2021, when Big Four CEOs were averaging $12.8 million annual paycheques, and the price of oil was skyrocketing, 2,988 oil workers lost their jobs, a finding that “should concern the UCP government and all Albertans,” Hussey said.

A sustained decrease in capital spending is partly responsible for the job losses, as is the fact that the oil industry has “entered the mature phase of its business life cycle,” he added.

Spending was also reduced as the Big Four navigated weak oil prices from 2015 to 2020, and now the “recent price unpredictability linked to the pandemic and to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.”

And now, despite the UCP’s tax giveaway, “no new oil sands mining megaprojects are being developed or proposed.”

Automation is also driving job losses in the oilfields themselves. Beginning in the wake of the 2014 oil price crash, the process the industry likes to call “de-manning” has intensified since the pandemic, with digitalization in field and back office operations looming large in this “troubling trend.”  

The climate emergency is also lighting a fire under oil operators determined to squeeze every dollar out of their dying industry. “Leading oil sands companies are speeding up automation to lower production costs by cutting jobs because they will soon be competing in a shrinking market, as the peak of global oil demand is likely to occur in the next five years,” Hussey said.

Citing a forecast from Ernst & Young and Petroleum Labour Market Information, he adds that automation may result in 46,108 job losses in the Canadian upstream oil and gas sector by 2040.

Amongst several recommendations, Hussey urges a return to a 12% tax rate for large corporations (the standard across British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) and a federal windfall profit tax “to help pay for household support programs.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories