Page 1/13
The development of COPMAN-Air: A highly sensitive
method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in air
Tomoyo Yoshinaga
Shionogi & Co., Ltd
Yoshinori Ando
Shionogi & Co., Ltd
Yumi Sato
Shionogi & Co., Ltd
Takeru Kishida
Kishida Clinic
Masaaki Kitajima
The University of Tokyo
Article
Keywords: Air sampling, COPMAN, COPMAN-Air, Fever clinic, qPCR, SARS-CoV-2
Posted Date: February 18th, 2025
DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5995479/v1" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5995479/v1</a>
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read Full License
Additional Declarations: Competing interest reported. Tomoyo Yoshinaga, Yoshinori Ando, and Yumi Sato
are employees of Shionogi & Co., Ltd. Masaaki Kitajima received research funding and patent royalties
from Shionogi & Co., Ltd.
Page 2/13
Abstract
Several studies have successfully detected SARS-CoV-2 in air samples; however, in most of these, the
focus was on validating the air collection method, and there was no report on the development of a
virus-detection method. In this study, to detect viruses in air samples more sensitively than conventional
detection methods, we applied COPMAN, a highly sensitive virus-detection method using wastewater
samples, to air samples to develop COPMAN-Air. Briey, with this method, the extremely low amount of
viral RNA in air samples is eciently detected via three reaction steps: RT, preamplication, and qPCR, as
with COPMAN. We evaluated COPMAN-Air using samples from a fever clinic for COVID-19 patients.
COPMAN-Air demonstrated a higher detection rate of viral RNA compared to conventional methods: 22
(95.7%) vs. 14 (60.9%) out of 23 samples. Additionally, a positive correlation (r=0.70) was found between
the amount of viral RNA detected by COPMAN-Air and the number of conrmed COVID-19 cases,
suggesting that COPMAN-Air could estimate the number of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals in a given
space based on the quantitative values of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air samples. Surveillance systems for
pathogens in the air using COPMAN-Air are expected to be valuable for assessing the number of
infected individuals and for the implementation of public health measures.
Introduction
SARS-CoV-2 is a virus that infects the human respiratory tract. It can be spread not only through direct
and indirect contact, but also through the inhalation of droplets and aerosols 1–6. Generally, people
infected with COVID-19 exhibit symptoms similar to those of the common cold or inuenza and recover
after several days, except for vulnerable people such as the elderly and those with underlying health
conditions 7,8. In addition, it has been reported that some people infected with SARS-CoV-2 show no
symptoms, and it is possible that these asymptomatic people may inadvertently play a role as spreaders
of the virus 9–12. Because environmental tests, which detect pathogens contained in the environment,
are non-invasive and are regarded as more cost-effective than clinical tests, they are attracting attention
as an alternative or complement to clinical testing 13.
SARS-CoV-2 is widely accepted as a virus that spreads through airborne transmission; therefore, one way
to prevent its spread is to help people to know if the air around them contains the virus. Air sampling to
detect the virus has been vigorously taken into consideration. Many of these studies have been
conducted in healthcare settings, such as isolation rooms for COVID-19 patients in hospitals and
quarantine hotels, where high concentrations of SARS-CoV-2-containing aerosols are expected to ll the
space 6,14–16. However, considering the social implementations of the virus, it is necessary to conduct a
feasibility study in a more practical community setting. Some reports have successfully detected SARS-
CoV-2 in public places such as student dormitories, schools, cafeterias, oces, shopping centers,
airports, and public transport 16–19. Nevertheless, because it is dicult to grasp the number of SARS-
CoV-2-infected individuals who have been or are presently in such spaces during air sampling, it is not
Page 3/13
possible to accurately conrm the validity of the virus detection method. Furthermore, it cannot be
determined whether the method is available for the early detection of infected individuals.
The major detection method for SARS-CoV-2 in the air is the quantitative measurement of viral RNA
derived from an air sample via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
15,16,18. There have been many reports on air sampling methods 16,20. Since the number of SARS-CoV-2-
containing aerosols in a space is expected to be extremely low, the optimization of the protocol to be
used after air sampling is also needed, to improve sensitivity of virus detection using RT-qPCR. In
addition, the protocol must be able to handle a large number of air samples for virus monitoring in many
spaces, to achieve worthwhile social implementation. To our knowledge, however, such efforts have not
yet been suciently veried.
Recently, our group developed the COPMAN (COagulation and Proteolysis method using MAgnetic
beads for Nucleic acids in wastewater) method, which can detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA from wastewater
samples with both high sensitivity and high throughput 21,22. In this study, we developed COPMAN-Air, a
new method that applies the near full-automation-available COPMAN technology and investigated the
detection sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA derived from air samples taken from a Thermo Fisher Scientic
AerosolSense Sampler. Some reports have clearly shown that this active air sampler is helpful in
collecting SARS-CoV-2-containing aerosols; however, considering the reported sensitivity and the
throughput estimated from the method used, there could still be room for improvement in the detection
method for social implementation. Furthermore, using our method, we measured the amount of SARS-
CoV-2 RNA in air samples collected at a so-called “fever clinic,” where outpatients with cold symptoms
are examined.
Results
Development of the COPMAN-Air method
We developed a new method (COPMAN-Air) for extracting nucleic acids from the aerosol-absorbed
media collected by the AerosolSense sampler. COPMAN-Air is based on the COPMAN method and
allows for the quantitative measurement of the amount of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air samples. Additionally,
we conrmed its ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA from a sampler spiked with inactivated SARS-CoV-2
using the COPMAN-Air method.
To compare the sensitivity of COMPAN-Air with the conventional method, we assessed its ability to
detect and quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA from media spiked with 50, 100, and 1000 copies of inactivated
SARS-CoV-2. The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) of the COPMAN-Air test was lower than
conventional methods, which use 5 µL of RNA, as 14 µL of RNA are subjected to qPCR detection with the
COPMAN-Air method. We compared the observed concentrations between the two methods, since both
were able to detect quantiable amounts of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the media spiked with 1,000 copies
of the virus. COPMAN-Air showed a higher observed concentration (516.2 copies/sampler) than the
Page 4/13
conventional method (319.5 copies/sampler (N gene), 224.1 copies/sampler (ORF1ab gene), 54.1
copies/sampler (S gene)). A t-test was conducted to compare COPMAN-Air with the conventional
method (N gene) and revealed a signicant difference (
p < 0.05). (Fig. 1a).
The COPMAN-Air method exhibited greater accuracy, compared to the conventional method, because its
coecient of variation was 7.2%, whereas those of the conventional methods were 24.9% (N gene),
21.7% (ORF1ab gene), and 20.3% (S gene).
When spiked with 50 copies of the virus, which is close to the LOD levels, COPMAN-Air exhibited a
greater detection rate than the conventional method (Fig. 1b). COPMAN-Air can be considered a more
sensitive method, compared to the conventional method, due to its lower theoretical LOD and greater
observed concentrations and detection rates.
Validation of COPMAN-Air and its comparison with the conventional method at a fever clinic
To compare COPMAN-Air with the conventional method using eld aerosol samplers, we conducted air
sampling at a fever clinic during the 5th wave of COVID-19 infections in Japan and evaluated these
samples. Based on the measurement results, COPMAN-Air was able to detect SARS-CoV-2 more
accurately in 22 (95.7%) out of 23 samples, with mean concentrations of 1217 copies/sampler, whereas
the conventional method detected the virus in only 14 (60.9%) out of 23 samples (Fig. 2). These ndings
from the clinic experiment led us to conclude that COPMAN-Air demonstrated superior detection
sensitivity than the conventional method. As a result, we have decided to use COPMAN in our future
clinic experiments.
Correlation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in air samples with the number of COVID-19 patients
COPMAN-Air could detect SARS-CoV-2 even when only a few COVID-19 patients were present (Fig. 2 and
Supplementary Table S1). To compare this with the total number of patients, we conducted extensive
additional air sampling at the fever clinic during the 6th and 7th waves of COVID-19 in Japan
(Supplementary Table S1). We evaluated the correlation between the number of COVID-19 patients and
the amount of SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA detected in the air samples using COPMAN-Air (Fig. 3). The data
points plotted on a scatter plot closely aligned along an approximate straight line (y = 1.066x + 1.590),
suggesting a linear relationship between the number of COVID-19 patients and the viral RNA detected in
the air samples. The results of the Pearson correlation test revealed a positive correlation between the
number of COVID-19 patients and the results of copy numbers of SARS-CoV-2 RNA found the air
samples measured using COPMAN-Air (r = 0.70).
Discussion
In most of the air samples available in this study, we were able to obtain quantitative data for SARS-CoV-
2 RNA using COPMAN-Air. There are two possible reasons why COPMAN-Air showed a higher observed
concentration and lower theoretical LOD compared to the conventional method. Although the protocols