plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20914 stories
·
20 followers

Young Black Men and Boys Are Quietly Taking On a Caregiving Crisis Few People See

1 Share

At 23, Omarion Calloway can't remember life without caring for others. Before he was a teenager he was cooking for his family and navigating adults' health care needs.

By age 10, he was bathing his grandmother and managing her oxygen tubes. A few years later, instead of playing outside, he remembers his "little hands" helping to lift his paralyzed uncle's body.

He's one of a growing number of Black boys and young men who have stepped into the role of caregiver, but society has not caught up to their needs, leaving their contributions invisible, several young men and a researcher told Capital B.

The New York University student is among the 5.4 million children and adolescents in the United States with family caregiving responsibilities. Most don't know or consider themselves "youth caregivers." They're just "good" sons, daughters, and grandchildren.

Although Black and Hispanic teen girls are disproportionately providing family care compared to white youth, Black boys and young men are also becoming the main caregivers in their families. During COVID-19, Black and brown youth caregivers filled gaps in a broken healthcare system.

Basir Raheem Easter, who has researched how Black communities are disproportionately providing care for those impacted by Alzheimer's disease and dementia, is troubled by the lack of visibility and representation.

"We were not being recognized. We're the hardest hit," said the founder of the dementia advocacy nonprofit Melanin Minded LLC, summing up the invisibility so many Black male youth caregivers experience.

Calloway says he didn't identify with being a youth caregiver because he didn't know the term existed.

"I really just thought what I was doing was OK and needed to be done. … I should not have had to do that, especially at a young age, especially at 10 years old," he said. "No child should ever have to carry adult responsibilities at that age."

Why visibility matters

Growing up in Montgomery, Alabama, Calloway says that he felt isolated and alone at times.

Omarion Calloway spends time with his grandmother Alma Jean Calloway. By the time he was 10, he was bathing his grandmother and managing her oxygen tubes. (Courtesy of Jared Calloway)

Omarion Calloway spends time with his grandmother Alma Jean Calloway. By the time he was 10, he was bathing his grandmother and managing her oxygen tubes. (Courtesy of Jared Calloway)

The college senior recalled how, when his uncle suffered a stroke that left him paralyzed from the neck down, he took on round-the-clock intimate care.

Calloway said he "always had this image of Black women taking care of other people. I didn't really see Black men doing that, especially in the caregiving role."

For many boys and young men, there are no visible examples of Black men as caregivers. They learn as they go or from the women they see.

Easter, the researcher and the father of a son who's also been a caregiver, cautioned that Black youth caregivers experience significant stress, yet traditional support groups don't address their cultural needs. During his doctoral program, he found that more culturally tailored systems, and interventions such as church support groups, are crucial.

"You're not seeing Black and brown kids on websites and social media. What's getting the focus and attention is that youth are caregiving broadly," said Easter, who holds a doctorate in multidisciplinary human services and counseling. But it's not recognizing that African American and Latino youth have been doing this for a very long time."

It's the kind of emotional and mental support that could help the Battle brothers in Nashville, Tennessee. Their mother is undergoing chemotherapy for recently diagnosed breast cancer, and their father has diabetes and suffered a stroke in March.

Cristen, Riley, Reece, Ryan, Carlton Battle. (Courtesy of Cristen Battle)

Cristen, Riley, Reece, Ryan, Carlton Battle. (Courtesy of Cristen Battle)

The teenagers take turns caring for their parents. Ryan, 18, works a part-time job to help with household finances, administers insulin to his father, and cooks breakfast for his family each day. Reece, 16, feeds his father and looks after his 8-year-old sister while their mother rests after chemotherapy.

Some might label domestic and intimate care tasks as "women's work." But for Reece, his parents instilled the value of providing care regardless of gender: "If I can help, I help."

The costs of being the invisible caregivers

Jaden Easter, 23, grew up in Beaumont, Texas, caring for his grandmother, who had frontotemporal dementia.

No one outside his family knew that he was providing significant support for her — a reality for many Black male youth caregivers. Caregiving took a toll on his schoolwork and social life. But his teachers and school counselor never knew he was a caregiver.

His friends were not aware, and he frequently missed out on typical social activities like going to the movies.

"It was kind of hard, like, to tell other friends, because I didn't really know if they were doing it, too," he said. "I'm pretty sure other people had grandmothers that they cared for, but I didn't know if they were as involved as I was."

When teachers are unaware of the impact of youth caregiving, they can mislabel falling asleep in class, cellphone use, and missed assignments due to caregiving as problematic behavior.

For Black boys in particular, the misrepresentation of their academic capacity has serious repercussions. If educators miss the signs of youth caregiving, some Black male youths — already at risk for the school-to-prison pipeline — may struggle to find adult advocates to support their needs or, worse, face unfair punishment in school.

Calloway understands this firsthand.

"It was very hard for me, especially caregiving, and then having the teacher not helping me in class when I was failing."

He said he reached out to his teacher, yet she turned him away. Another time, when he didn't submit a middle school homework assignment because of immense caregiving duties, he was put on silent lunch as punishment.

"Why would you do that?" Calloway reflects. "As a teacher, you should know when a child is going through something."

The mental health challenges youth caregivers face is widely documented. Research has shown that they experience high rates of depression, anxiety, bullying, and self-harm compared to their non-caregiving peers.

When Calloway's mother was depressed, he couldn't help but get depressed, often worrying about her well-being as they navigated caring for his "nana" together.

Ryan and Reece say that their mental health has suffered since becoming caregivers, with chronic anxiety and nervousness as the most prominent symptoms. They use sports as a way to preserve their mental health, but they're open to more dedicated formal caregiver support.

"Running track is my outlet, and I put more determination into that," Ryan said.

Still, there's another burden. Food insecurity, difficulty paying household bills, and contributing to savings accounts are more challenging for Black and younger caregivers, according to a 2025 report by the National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP.

Even as teenagers, the Battle brothers understand how the current political climate worsens caregiving costs. The steep Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" will disproportionately hurt Black families reliant on paid caregiving programs. A recent study found that Black caregivers spend more than 34% of their annual income on caregiving-related expenditures, compared to 14% by their white caregiving counterparts.

Ultimately, Ryan said he believes the U.S. needs policy change to improve the life outcomes of Black male youth caregivers like himself.

"I would change health insurance policies. Households need immediate support and things fall to the household and they shouldn't, like the hospital bills for both my mom and my dad," he said. "There are so many different medications that are expensive."

Calloway also feels that the U.S. government has a responsibility to support youth caregivers.

"You see a policy moving forward for young caregivers who need this, who need that funding, you should act on it immediately," he says. "Why are we voting "no" to advocating for child caregivers? That ain't right. Make it make sense."

Finding support and a path forward

Despite these challenges, Black male youth caregivers continue to carve their own paths, not only for themselves, but for their peers.

Calloway and the younger Easter see themselves as advocates. They are spreading awareness about youth caregiving, disability, and age-related diseases by utilizing the reach of social media, keynotes at national conferences, podcasts and press interviews.

The Easter family. Basir Raheem Easter said Black youth caregivers experience significant stress, yet traditional support groups don't address their cultural needs. (Courtesy of the Easter family)

The Easter family. Basir Raheem Easter said Black youth caregivers experience significant stress, yet traditional support groups don't address their cultural needs. (Courtesy of the Easter family)

For his senior thesis, Calloway produced a documentary on youth caregiving because "I'm the type of person who tells untold stories, and untold stories of unseen heroes out there. Because I feel like conversations, especially by youth caregivers, are really important because they deserve a life as well. They deserve for their voices to be heard."

He is also developing a digital platform entitled We Rise Loud to share the stories of other youth caregivers and provide guidance on applying for college scholarships. His self-help website, More Than Survival–A Young Caregiver's Journey, for other youth caregivers illustrates his personal growth as a caregiver and serves as a mental health resource for others.

In 2020, Jaden and his father, the researcher, launched the Bridge Youth program to support adolescents caring for those with dementia-related diseases. The Bridge Youth program provides age-appropriate, culturally appropriate caregiving training for young people. They also facilitate academic and employment guidance for youth caregivers who have a unique and valuable skill set but have often fallen behind their non-caregiving peers when it comes to thinking about their future aims.

Interventions created by Black male youth caregivers come at the right time. As Easter, Calloway, and the Battle brothers step into adulthood, their stories illuminate a need for young caregivers to be seen and supported, but also a path forward.

"Whatever I thought was drowning me, it actually taught me to swim," Calloway said.

The post Young Black Men and Boys Are Quietly Taking On a Caregiving Crisis Few People See appeared first on Capital B News.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
37 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

NSF closes fiscal 2026 with over $1 billion left unspent

1 Comment and 2 Shares

The latest chemistry news, including important research advances, business and policy trends, chemical safety practices, career guidance, and more.

Read More

Over $1 billion sat unused in US National Science Foundation (NSF) accounts as fiscal 2026 came to a close Oct. 1. A White House Office of Management and Budget apportionment published in August estimates that the NSF will carry $1.7 billion over into fiscal 2027.

The exact number will probably keep changing for at least another year and a half as the agency consolidates and reevaluates figures coming from its different accounts, says Alessandra Zimmermann, project director for the R&D budget and policy program at the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The New York Times recently reported a number closer to $1.4 billion.

Read the whole story
acdha
6 days ago
reply
This is arson
Washington, DC
sarcozona
19 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

catchymemes:

2 Shares

catchymemes:

Read the whole story
sarcozona
19 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Nadezh
5 days ago
reply
Melbourne, Australia
Share this story
Delete

John Ganz

1 Share

cpericardium:

John Ganz

Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Common Chemicals Trigger Alarming Changes in Human Breast Tissue Models

1 Share
Artificially Colored Breast Tissue OrganoidA breast tissue organoid that has been artificially colored. Credit: The Kuperwasser Lab

Chemicals that disrupt hormones may leave a molecular “scar” that could someday help identify people at higher risk of breast cancer, research in human breast tissue models suggests.

People are typically exposed to several chemicals at once, including endocrine-disrupting chemicals that can interfere with the body’s hormones. Scientists have increasingly questioned whether these exposures contribute to breast cancer risk. Much of the evidence, however, comes from animal models or laboratory-grown cells that cannot fully reproduce the complexity of human breast tissue.

Researchers at Tufts University School of Medicine and Boston University investigated those effects using three-dimensional models of normal human breast tissue called organoids. Their study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that three common bisphenols, BPA, BPS, and BPF, produced relatively few changes when tested individually. When combined at very low concentrations comparable to levels detected in human blood and urine, the chemicals disrupted normal development in organoids from most of the tissue donors.

Breast development continues long after birth

The organoids were grown from breast tissue donated by 13 healthy young women. They contain multiple types of breast cells and can reproduce some aspects of human breast tissue development, allowing researchers to examine chemical exposures during that process.

“The breast also is unusual in that it undergoes major developmental changes well after birth, including during puberty and pregnancy,” said Charlotte Kuperwasser, the study’s senior author and a professor of developmental, molecular, and chemical biology at Tufts University School of Medicine. “And the concern is that breast tissue cells may be highly sensitive to environmental cues, such as chemical exposure, during critical windows of mammary gland development.”

As the organoids developed over about three weeks, the team exposed them to individual chemicals and mixtures. The panel included substances that disrupt hormones, chemicals that affect metabolism, and known or suspected carcinogens. Researchers then analyzed changes in gene activity and DNA modifications. Different chemicals affected development in different ways, with the bisphenol mixture producing the most striking finding.

“We intentionally used concentrations of chemicals that were relevant to real-world exposure rather than the very high doses sometimes used in toxicology studies,” said Kuperwasser. “We also tested a mixture of these because people are typically exposed to multiple chemicals at the same time.”

A molecular resemblance to lobular cancer

To explore how the changes associated with the bisphenol mixture might relate to disease, the team compared them with molecular data from human breast cancers. The exposure-associated pattern was most strongly represented in data from patients with invasive lobular carcinoma, a type of breast cancer that may not produce a detectable lump and can be difficult to detect with a mammogram.

That resemblance does not establish that the chemicals cause cancer or explain how the observed changes might contribute to breast disease. The researchers instead describe the work as a new way to investigate how environmental exposures affect normal human tissue before cancer develops.

“Historically, we have thought about cancer risk largely in terms of inherited mutations, lifestyle factors, and exposures that directly damage DNA,” said Kuperwasser. “These findings raise another possibility: Environmental exposures may subtly alter how normal tissues develop, leaving behind molecular changes that do not cause cancer by themselves but may make the tissue more permissive to cancer many years later.”

Molecular “scars” might guide earlier screening

Kuperwasser noted that persistent molecular changes could eventually serve as a biological record, like a “scar” of past exposure. If validated in people, such markers could potentially help identify individuals at higher risk of breast cancer and guide earlier or more targeted screening.

“If these results are validated by additional studies, they could change how we think about cancer prevention,” said Kuperwasser.

Studies involving larger and more diverse groups of donors, along with a broader range of chemicals and mixtures, are needed to determine how widely the findings apply. Researchers also need to establish whether the molecular changes seen in organoids persist in human tissues and whether they are associated with, or contribute to, breast disease later in life.

Reference: “Environmental chemical mixtures reprogram mammary epithelial development to epigenetic states associated with breast cancer” by Meadow Parrish, Meloryn Seraj, Helia Nikoueian, Nicole Traugh, Andrew Chen, Piyush B. Gupta, Stefano Monti and Charlotte Kuperwasser, 15 October 2026, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2613054123

Supported by Find The Cause Breast Cancer Foundation.

Never miss a breakthrough: Join the SciTechDaily newsletter.
Follow us on Google and Google News.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
3 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

On legacy ideas - Chris Dillow

1 Share

A lot has been written about how the right has been radicalised in recent years. Among civilised people, however, there is the opposite problem - that their beliefs have not sufficiently changed with the times.

Napoleon never actually said “to understand the man you have to know what was happening in the world when he was twenty”, but if he had he would have been right. Our formative years are, well, formative. People who grew up in hard times (pdf) are more risk-averse in later life and even more introverted and emotionally unstable. It’s plausible therefore that ideas we acquire in our formative years might persist decades later, even outliving their empirical base.

One example of what I mean is Labour’s desire to create good jobs. This is wholly understandable; anyone over the age of 40 would have been formed by experience of mass unemployment, when job creation should have been the top priority. But things aren’t so simple today. We’re not far from what is effectively full employment; there’ll always be some jobless because of mismatches between the characteristics of the unemployed and those required by employers. In this world, significant job creation would lead to higher wage inflation, to which the Bank of England would respond with higher interest rates. (The same of course would be true of significant increases in military spending.)

For now, at least, therefore, our problem isn’t simply to create good jobs. It’s to destroy some others to make room for the ones we want: builders, solar panel makers, heat pump installers, drone manufacturers, carers and so on.

You might imagine that this is the function of macroeconomic policy; higher taxes or higher interest rates do indeed destroy jobs.

Problem is, they’re not necessarily the ones we want to destroy. Such measures would tend to depress consumer spending and hence risk exacerbating the decline of our high streets. Not only is this a bad thing in itself, it would tend to strengthen the far right.

Here we run into another idea from our youths that is no longer useful. Maynard Keynes wrote:

I see no reason to suppose that the existing system seriously misemploys the factors of production which are in use...It is in determining the volume, not the direction, of actual employment that the existing system has broken down.

This, however, is no longer true. Factors of production are misemployed. We have “genuinely unskilled” fund managers exploiting clients; young Deliveroo riders jeopardising pedestrians; bullshit jobs; surveillance and guard labour; and well-paid lawyers and accountants helping people dodge tax. Higher taxes or interest rates on their own won’t destroy these jobs. We need other, more interventionist, policies. But decades of that Keynesian mindset don’t prepare us for thinking about these.

This is not the only way in which faith in free markets is a legacy idea that’s no longer so relevant today. Most of us over the age of 40 were educated to take decent economic growth for granted; in the 60 years after WWII real GDP grew by an average of 2.3% a year.

Such dynamism led politicians to believe that the task of government was mostly to create the conditions in which capitalism could get on with the job of delivering the goods. On the Tory side, these comprised weaker trades unions, privatization, tax cuts and government otherwise stepping aside; on the Labour side policy stability and education. Both, though, took for granted an underlying dynamism. But that has disappeared, and might in fact have been only an artefact of the post-war years. Our challenge now is either to find new ways of raising growth (which requires an attack on powerful vested interests) or to find ways of living with stagnation. The political elites seem unable to do either.

Yet another outdated legacy idea is our attitude to markets. Those of us formed during the cold war and its aftermath were inculcated into a simple ideological dichotomy: free markets vs central planning. The upshot is that we’re ill-equipped to think of the market as a technology - something that’s more useful in some contexts than others, and which needs adapting to conditions.

Ronald Coase famously pointed out that there is “a cost of using the price mechanism”. This can be the cognitive load of finding the best products or jobs; the difficulty of minimizing how much one is ripped off by utility and broadband suppliers; time spent shopping around; the difficulty of enforcing or escaping contracts; and so on. Companies have evolved ways of reducing this cost. For individuals, however, this evolution has been less developed. We know that state regulation is inadequate, but could we not develop stronger consumer advisors and advocates to both help us in markets and be a countervailing power to that of big companies? Again, the legacy of an ideologized state vs market dichotomy holds us back from more rigorous thinking that can address the problems of rip-off Britain.

There’s another damaging legacy idea: our attitudes to the media. Years ago, millions of people bought newspapers: in 1992, for example, the combined sales of the Sun, Mail, Express and Telegraph were 7.8m a day. That meant governments had to pay attention to the newspapers not only because they reached so many voters but also because they expressed the opinion of those voters. Today, however, these four sell only around 1.5m (we can’t be exact because the Telegraph and Sun no longer publicise their sales). That represents less than one voter in 30, and I suspect many of these buyers are fixed in their voting intentions.

During my adulthood, the press has gone from mainstream to marginal. And yet it still dominates politics not merely because MPs court its favour but because it sets the agenda, even on the BBC. The upshot is that politics is dominated by culture war BS and attacks on migrants, trans people and scroungers to the detriment of issues that affect our everyday lives such as stagnating living standards, rip-off utility bills, high street decline, climate change, poor public services and so on.

This dominance, however, is a legacy idea. It was formed when the press was influential and persists beyond its evidence base. But the fact is that newspapers represent a small, cranky and racist minority; many more people today own a fishing licence than buy the Daily Mail on a typical day. Their power is like that of the Wizard of Oz’s; it exists only because people believe in it, and behind the curtain is a mere humbug.

Recognizing that our ideas about the media are out-dated is, however, only part of the story. The questions then arise: is it possible to rebuild our public sphere so as to permit rational informed debate? Can we overcome the problems posed by fragmentation, cranks and fanatics? Again, old ideas are no use to us.

I don’t intend all this as a complete list of zombie ideas; I’d add the idea of bankers’ bonuses to that. I do so merely to show that the ideas that people over the age of around 50 formed in their youth are a handicap to thinking about politics today. Modernization has a bad rap these days, partly because it is tainted by association with Blairism, but it is just what we need now.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
3 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories