plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
18980 stories
·
21 followers

Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange

1 Comment
Read the whole story
sarcozona
20 hours ago
reply
Maybe the reason musk insisted on cameras instead of lidar was sinister instead of weird and kind of stupid
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Losing more than a Forest Service job - High Country News

1 Share

On a snowy Saturday in February, seven just-fired, now-former U.S. Forest Service employees — including my partner and me — gathered in our living room, in a small town nestled against the east slope of the Washington Cascades, to mourn, rage and toast the end of an era. Each of us had worked for the Forest Service for at least five years — some for over a decade — and after years of seasonal work, all of us had finally, last year, been promoted to permanent positions. None of us made more than $23 an hour; none of us had ever received a negative performance review.

We sipped whiskey from jam jars. We made a pyramid of Rainier beers on the coffee table and picked them off one by one. We shared brownies, chips and dips, and stories. Stories that some of us had heard many times already: ill-fated bushwhacks in search of lost trails; unsettling encounters, human and not, deep in the woods. These stories are our oral history, our institutional knowledge — a record of a way of life, one dedicated to service and stewardship, that our country is on the verge of losing.

Every summer, my trail crew cleared thousands of downed logs from hundreds of miles of trail, often in burned forests. We used dynamite to blast away backcountry rockslides. We built bridges by hand in the wilderness. We planned and supervised projects for volunteer groups and youth corps. Our mule packer, who was also just fired, hauled in supplies and tools for those partner crews, as well as for our own crew, the fire crews and the tree-planting crews. Our wilderness rangers buried thousands of pounds of poop and packed out thousands of pounds of trash every year from fragile alpine ecosystems. They assisted on search and rescue missions, and, by intercepting unprepared hikers, prevented many more rescues from needing to happen at all.

The more time I spent doing trail work, the more convinced I was that becoming aware of our interdependence with the land and with each other is crucial to humanity’s survival.

Our work was physically challenging and never lucrative, but we did it because we believe in the importance of access to public lands. The day-to-day reality of our jobs only reinforced that belief. Spending time in wild spaces is what makes us feel at once more human and more connected to the world outside our individual human selves. In my job on a trail crew, I experienced this power for myself every day, at the same time that I worked to make it possible for the public to do so, too. The more time I spent doing trail work, the more convinced I was that becoming aware of our interdependence with the land and with each other is crucial to humanity’s survival.

Working in the woods wasn’t always a “dream job.” Over my eight years on a Forest Service trail crew, I endured countless minor injuries — strains and sprains, puncture wounds and bright green bruises, insect stings that made my limbs swell alarmingly — and I watched friends and co-workers suffer worse. In a still male-dominated field, I put up with plenty of casual misogyny, men who assumed that I was less strong or smart or experienced than I am. I worked in driving rain, in shoulder-season snow, in triple-digit heat, in burned forests where trees fell without warning. I took immense pride in all of it, but the low pay got harder to stomach each time I hefted my pack and stepped out, saw on my shoulder, onto the trails I’d come to know like rooms in a childhood home.

It’s a testament to Forest Service workers’ belief in the fundamental value of our jobs that so many of us stuck with it, even when cushier options presented themselves, even when our work so often felt invisible and unappreciated. Many hikers don’t even realize that trails need maintenance on an ongoing basis, especially after wildfires, and that the scale of that essential work requires experienced professionals with local knowledge. The trail users we encountered on the job often assumed we were volunteers. The outpouring of support for fired federal workers over the past few weeks has meant the world to people like me, but it’s also been a sharp reminder of how much of the important work done in this country is easily taken for granted, until it’s suddenly gone.

Many hikers don’t even realize that trails need maintenance on an ongoing basis.

Assurances that we’ll all find other jobs before too long miss the point. We don’t necessarily want other jobs. We don’t want sympathy. We want our work, and the places we’ve done that work, to be recognized and valued.

A few weeks before we were fired, my partner and I went to see a beloved local band play at a beloved local bar, the kind with old wooden skis and crosscut saws on the wall, where regulars wear hoodies memorializing the last big wildfire. During set break, we fell into conversation with a couple on the patio. We tried to describe what we did for a living. The sweaty, dirty days of running saws in shadeless, burned-over forests. The long backcountry trips when we eagerly awaited the twice-daily fire weather forecast on our two-way radios. How we met and fell in love as our rawest, stinkiest selves.

“What a beautiful life,” the woman said. My knee-jerk reaction was to rankle at the romanticization of what, in reality, often felt like just another form of thankless, underpaid labor. I hemmed and hawed in response, launching into a practiced speech about how, yes, it does seem cool at first to get paid to work in some of America’s most remote and breathtaking places, but before long you’re 35 years old with no savings and a tired back. Yes, we consider ourselves lucky. We’re grateful. But.

My new friend wasn’t buying it. “It really sounds like a beautiful life,” she repeated. Now that it’s gone, I know — as I’ve always known, deep down inside — how right she is.

We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Dump truck driver pleads guilty in fatal cyclist collision in North Vancouver - BC | Globalnews.ca

1 Comment

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Cyclists lives are shockingly devalued
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Sudden Cardiac Arrest Among Young Competitive Athletes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic | Cardiology | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network

1 Comment

Early reports during the COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns that young athletes with COVID-19 would be at increased risk of myocarditis and sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or sudden cardiac death (SCD).1 Many media and social media reports insinuated that COVID-19 illness or mRNA vaccines caused an increase in SCA/SCD in athletes.2 Our objective was to compare the prevalence of SCA/SCD in young athletes in the 3 years before the pandemic with the first 3 years of the pandemic using data from the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research (NCCSIR).

This prospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, followed the STROBE reporting guidelines, and included a 6-year dataset from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022. Informed consent was obtained in survivors and next-of-kin when possible to obtain autopsy reports and medical records. The prepandemic period was defined as calendar years 2017 to 2019, and the pandemic period defined as calendar years 2020 to 2022. Cases of SCA/SCD in young athletes were identified through an ongoing surveillance program led by the NCCSIR, with detailed methods reported previously.3 We included competitive athletes from the youth, middle school, high school, club, college, or professional levels who experienced SCA/SCD at any time (ie, during exercise, rest, or sleep). SCA was defined as an unexpected collapse in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or defibrillation was provided in an individual who survived. SCD was defined as a sudden unexpected death due to a cardiac cause or a structurally normal heart with no other explanation for death and a history consistent with cardiac-related death.3 For fatalities, the cause of SCD was determined by an expert panel using previously published criteria3 and all available information from autopsy, medical examiner, coroner, and medical records. All sources of information were used to classify race or ethnicity. If medical or postmortem records were not available or did not define race or ethnicity, then media reports and athlete photos were used to determine race or ethnicity. Race and ethnicity are included in this study because of ongoing disparities in SCA outcomes. Descriptive statistics summarized characteristics, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test, with significance defined as 2-sided P < .05. Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Because sports participation may have declined early in the pandemic, a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainty in 2020 by comparing 2017 to 2018 with 2021 to 2022.

A total of 387 SCA/SCD cases (mean [SD] age, 16.5 [2.8] years; 334 male individuals [86.3%]) were identified (Table). The observed number of SCA/SCD cases before the pandemic was not significantly different than the number of SCA/SCD cases during the pandemic (203 vs 184 cases; χ21 = 0.93; P = .33). Overall survival was 50.9% (197 of 387 cases). The proportion of SCD was similar before and during the pandemic (106 of 203 cases [52.2%] vs 84 of 184 cases [45.7%]; χ21 = 1.66; P = .20) (Figure). A specific cause could be determined in 139 of 190 SCD cases (73.2%) using autopsy data or coroner reports. Myocarditis was the confirmed cause of SCD in 3 cases before and 4 cases during the pandemic.

This cohort study found no increase in SCA/SCD in young competitive athletes in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that reports asserting otherwise were overestimating the cardiovascular risk of COVID-19 infection, vaccination, and myocarditis. Many athlete cases shown in social media video montages occurred before the pandemic yet claimed COVID-19 infection or vaccination raised the risk of SCA/SCD. Paratz et al4 also showed no association between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the COVID-19 vaccination in young people, and Daems et al5 found no evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccination increases the risk of SCA/SCD in athletes.

Our study is limited by the potential for missed cases, variable participation during the pandemic, including a 2.5% decline in college athlete participation in 2020 to 2021,6 and incomplete data on causes. Although SCA/SCD in young athletes requires more robust preventive strategies, this study suggests the COVID-19 pandemic did not increase SCA/SCD risk in athletes.

Accepted for Publication: December 18, 2024.

Published: February 24, 2025. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61327

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2025 Astley C et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Jonathan A. Drezner, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Center for Sports Cardiology, University of Washington, Box 354060, Seattle, WA 98195-4060 ([email protected]).

Author Contributions: Dr Drezner had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Astley, Petek, DeLong, Harmon, Drezner.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: DeLong, Kucera, Goettsch, Drezner.

Drafting of the manuscript: Astley, DeLong, Kucera, Goettsch, Drezner.

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Petek, DeLong, Kucera, Harmon, Drezner.

Statistical analysis: Astley, DeLong, Kucera, Drezner.

Obtained funding: Kucera, Drezner.

Administrative, technical, or material support: DeLong, Goettsch, Drezner.

Supervision: Astley, Petek, Kucera, Harmon, Drezner.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Drezner reported serving as an advisor for Ainthoven outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), funded in part by the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the National Federation of State High School Associations, the American Football Coaches Association, the National Athletic Trainers’ Association, the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, and the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Sharing Statement: See the Supplement.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Extremely good news
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Trump’s heist in broad daylight

1 Comment

€69 per month

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

  • Global news & analysis
  • Expert opinion
  • FT App on Android & iOS
  • FT Edit app
  • FirstFT: the day's biggest stories
  • 20+ curated newsletters
  • Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
  • FT Videos & Podcasts
  • 20 monthly gift articles to share
  • Lex: FT's flagship investment column
  • 15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts
  • FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition
Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 days ago
reply
A charter for criminals indeed

“On Sunday, Trump said that five cryptocurrencies would be included on the US Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. America’s “crypto reserve” would include bitcoin, ethereum and three others (solana, cardano and XRP) that caught investors unawares. Whether David Sacks, Trump’s “crypto and AI czar”, whose investment firm has stakes in all five, was also surprised is a question for the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each surged in value following Trump’s announcement.

A few hours later, Trump scrapped America’s chief anti-money laundering measure — the rule that US shell companies must disclose their beneficial owner. The second move also flowed from his first. Last month, he shut down the Department of Justice’s anti-kleptocracy initiative, which has been seizing assets such as mega yachts from sanctioned Russian oligarchs.”
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Germany complied with all air pollutant limits for the first time in 2024 | heise autos

1 Share

In 2024, Germany complied with the EU limit values for the most important air pollutants, which were introduced in 2010 and are still binding today, for the first time. According to the Federal Environment Agency, this conclusion is based on the values from around 600 measuring stations. After particulate matter, which fell below the limit value for the seventh year in a row, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) has now also remained below its threshold at all stations throughout the year with an average annual limit value of 40 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Ozone, the third main pollutant, has never featured so prominently in the headlines. The main polluters are industry and traffic.

Anzeige

For a long time, Munich city center – was one of the worst problem zones – However, at 39 micrograms last year, the value was only just below the limit. The city has been fighting driving bans for years in a series of court rulings due to notorious exceedances and delaying tactics, after the Federal Administrative Court approved the introduction of driving bans in 2018 following a lawsuit by Deutsche Umwelthilfe. Munich recently imposed a 30 km/h speed limit for part of the Mittlerer Ring – from the original 60 km/h speed limit.

Of course, the measurable success did not come from the imposition of speed limits alone, but rather from the ongoing renewal of the vehicle fleet on the roads and a growing number of electric cars. The subsidized retrofitting of particulate filters and the obligation for new cars also played an important role. The higher the proportion of cars with modern exhaust gas aftertreatment, the lower the pollution, apart from cars with fraudulent software. And it is not only in Munich that the electrification of buses in local public transport has helped to reduce pollution, as the UBA notes.

The authority points out that the current limits no longer meet the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO). Significantly lower limits are therefore already in the pipeline for 2030. They provide for an annual average value for NO2 halved to just 20 micrograms per cubic meter, and for particulate matter with the particle size PM2.5 it is to be reduced from 25 to 10 micrograms. Incidentally, the Federal Environment Agency believes that these planned values could nevertheless be achieved much more quickly –, namely as early as 2035 –.

(fpi)

Don't miss any news – follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn or Mastodon.

This article was originally published in German. It was translated with technical assistance and editorially reviewed before publication.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories