plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20706 stories
·
19 followers

Cyclospora wake-up call: 'Eat Real Food' relies on robust food safety | STAT

1 Share

I spent nearly a decade leading FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. That role convinced me that food safety and nutrition are interdependent in so many ways, and if we want to make our population healthier, we need to support both.

Over the past few weeks, record numbers of cases of cyclosporiasis have driven that message home broadly, including to consumers. FDA is currently investigating six cyclospora outbreaks, only one of which is currently linked to shredded iceberg lettuce.

Fresh fruits and vegetables, which nutritionists have been promoting for decades, are especially vulnerable to cyclospora contamination. In response to a diarrheal disease outbreak caused by cyclospora, the public has been advised to be cautious about consuming fresh fruits and vegetables. Social media has erupted with comments like “more pizza!” and “oreos never gave me explosive diarrhea!” Even before this outbreak, such as during outbreaks involving E. coli and romaine lettuce, I heard from many that they would rather eat “a bag of Doritos than a salad.”

FDA has long evaluated which foods are highest risk for microbial contamination and has published that list as part of work implementing the congressionally mandated FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. FDA refers to the list as a “Food Traceability List,” because these foods have additional obligations for traceability to help facilitate foodborne outbreak investigations. The list includes things like cucumbers, herbs, leafy greens, melons, peppers, sprouts, tomatoes, other vegetables, and fresh-cut fruits. It also includes other commodities such as certain cheeses. (Note that meat and poultry are also at high risk for contamination with pathogens like E. coli and salmonella but are not on the FDA list as they are regulated by USDA.) 

What do these higher-risk foods all have in common? As a group, they are recommended as part of a healthy dietary pattern, and are certainly among the “real foods” being promoted by the administration for better nutrition and chronic disease risk reduction.

Having said that, the current administration is now learning the criticality of microbial food safety as they work to manage an outbreak response that will undoubtedly have ramifications for consumer perception and consumption of highly nutritious foods that are vulnerable to microbial contamination. Over the past 18 months, the administration has focused on chemicals rather than microbes in foods and has taken numerous steps that actively undermine microbial food safety:

  • Losses of experienced career employees at FDA and CDC. That has direct adverse impacts at each agency and also the potential for compound effects. Interagency emergency response is complex and works best when teams of employees have relevant experience working together on prior outbreaks, including cyclospora outbreaks, which differ in many ways from bacterial outbreaks.
  • Budgetary cuts at both CDC and FDA. These federal agencies help support and resource state food safety efforts and with federal budget cuts, state budget cuts follow. We have seen that states like Michigan have assumed a very heavy load responding to this outbreak. With less money, FDA will also do less proactive sampling for microbial contaminants such as cyclospora.
  • Changes made to the national foodborne illness surveillance program, FoodNet, which previously tracked eight pathogens and eliminated six from federal surveillance, including cyclospora.
  • Delaying the date that industry must comply with requirements to be able to trace high-risk foods from farm/manufacturer through the supply chain. That effort should be in effect now but was delayed by the administration until July 2028.
  • Closing a USDA agricultural research facility in Beltsville, Md., that included laboratories working on cyclospora.
  • Disbanding the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria in Food, which provided food safety advice on challenging issues to FDA and USDA, including on cyclospora.

I am often asked how a particular action is impacting food safety, but the reality is that it is the cumulative impact of these and other changes that create a diminished food safety system.

To make matters even more challenging, the administration has called climate change a “hoax” and is supporting policies that will accelerate it. Warming environments, and climate events like extreme rainfall and flooding, will increase food safety risks, and the destruction of impacted foods leads to more food waste. Food waste itself is an established contributor to global warming. The destruction of large quantities of lettuce from Mexico can be anticipated, with energy wasted in the original production/processing/international distribution of product, plus energy involved in disposal of contaminated product.

The cyclospora outbreak should be a wake-up call for all of us, and especially our federal leaders charged with protecting and promoting health. Consumers should not be faced with a trade-off between nutrition and food safety — health is made possible when food safety supports consumer confidence in fruits and vegetables. “Real foods” are vulnerable to real pathogens.

Susan Mayne, Ph.D., served as director of the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition from 2015 to 2023. She is an adjunct professor at the Yale School of Public Health. This essay first appeared on her Substack.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
37 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Young men and cars

1 Share

wasps on some really lovely purple flower

Jim was up this weekend and we had a nice Vermont summer weekend. Porch time. Lazy time. Friend time. We went out to go pick blueberries on Sunday only to find that Jim’s car (a 2014 Corolla, an excellent car) just would crank and not turn over. We did the basic troubleshooting and none of it worked. We were trying to stay on top of it and not just wait and see if my mechanic could look at it on Monday, so we called a mobile mechanic. In all my years of car and truck ownership, I had somehow never done this before. I think I never thought I could afford it before? But we had more money than time and called the guy Yelp said might be good for this. About 40 minutes later a scruffy kid named Ray (I can somehow not stop calling him a kid despite the fact that he is a grown up father of two) with a huge tattoo that said BEOWULF on his arm and a Venmo that was @not_jesus_christ appeared at my place. We had sent him money for parts before he showed up–the parts store was on the way–and just seeing him was a relief.

He did a heroic amount of work on the car just right there in the street. Replaced the fuel pump which is a usual culprit. Changed out some relays. Probed and tested the electrical system. He got it running! But then it stalled after about 15 minutes. Which was a new data point. Restarting it led to a new noise. All more data. We were losing the light and every neighborhood dog walker and political canvasser had stopped by with opinions and advice. And we were paying the kid by the hour. Ray finally said he wouldn’t be able to get it going this evening, was really sorry about it. We said we’d probably take it to the mechanic tomorrow, and we started scenario-planning Jim’s car options (my truck which isn’t that comfy on long trips? take it to a dealer and pay through the nose? buy a new car on Monday?). We went to bed a little dejected.

Ray texted Jim at 11 pm “u up?” Jim was, in fact, up. Ray said he’d been thinking about the car all night, had some new ideas, if we hadn’t made a plan yet, could he try a few more things tomorrow? We said sure, why not? Paid for some more parts. He was here the good part of Monday. Seemed to know what he was doing but, I’ll be honest, I’m not sure I would have known if he wasn’t. Jim kept telling him to talk to me “She’s the one that knows more about cars” (true). The car lost a bunch of oil in one of the parts-changes and I started worrying about the neighborhood optics as well as Jim’s car future. Did I mention that Jim’s workplace was also laying off somewhere between 20-25% of their staff and he would find out that week if he was among them? (he wasn’t)

The last thing that Ray did was replace a timing belt tensioner something something and had to use RTV (a sort of gasket-maker sealant) for one of the gaskets which has to cure for 24 hours. Ray was pretty sure he had it fixed. Told us to start the car the next day and either it’s 100% fixed or it’s 100% going to drain all of its oil on to the road again and be pretty dead. We waited. We slept poorly. Before Jim was awake the next morning I went out with a friend and tried to turn the car on. It worked! When Jim woke up, I told him the good news. He drove home fine. The car’s still running fine. We gave the kid five stars on Yelp and Facebook. Turns out that Beowulf was his son’s name. Sometimes things work out.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
56 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

NIH must “open scientific careers to skilled craftspeople and practitioners” | DrugMonkey

1 Share

The regime has published a “Landmark Report and Recommendations for Renewing American Scientific Discovery” and the website lists four bullet points they call “key pillars” [h/t: Jeremy Berg]. The fourth one caught my eye.

Ensure That Science and Technology Better the Lives of All Americans
Federal agencies should integrate hands-on technical training and apprenticeships into STEM education, open scientific careers to skilled craftspeople and practitioners, build dense regional innovation clusters that link research with advanced manufacturing, and ensure that the economic returns of discovery reach every region and community in the country.

All Federal R&D agencies are “required to submit an action plan within 90 days outlining implementation of these priority practices“. This would presumably include the NIH, which should now be addressing the fourth pillar.

The charge to “integrate hands-on technical training and apprenticeships into STEM education” goes beyond perplexing. This is a real head scratcher because this what we DO. We train people. We do this almost by default in our academic science labs, often funded by NIH or other federal grants. The research University expects its scientist professors to host undergraduates in their laboratories. This can be a brief “experience” of a few weeks or extend to a semester. It can be a year. It can turn into a multi-year stay. It can involve the more basic levels of technical training to, e.g., operate a pipette, prepare a solution or to weigh a rat. It can be research projects of varying scope, right up to the level of an early graduate student, in some cases. Master’s programs may incorporate even more technical training and apprenticeships or integrate them more extensively with the STEM education.

The NIH (and the NSF) already have specific programs of funding to further support hands-on technical training and apprenticeships. There are conference support awards that include funding to support undergraduate attendance. There are summer research programs funded by the NIH to bring in undergraduates and even high school students. Programs to bring in primary and secondary STEM teachers. There are school-year programs designed to bring undergraduates into labs.

This investment by the NIH goes everywhere. The R15 mechanism is for grants that build capacity and support research experiences at colleges and Universities that are not heavily funded by NIH research grants. The IDeA programs likewise spread science training and research into less research intensive parts of the country.

I haven’t read the full report yet, so I don’t know what it finds deficient about these existing programs. I don’t know that it is possible to reach “every region and community in the country” but these NIH programs make a good stab at it. So what is being requested here? “Do more”? or do something (what?) differently?

Or is the goal to shift the relative balance of funding away from research activities and put more into these educational and outreach activities? This seems to be the most likely outcome, given that the regime is fighting tooth and nail to reduce the overall amount appropriated for the NIH.

I am going to leave the “practitioners” part aside, as I assume this is related to clinical care and references people outside of the traditional structures of medicine, health care and clinical research.

What is all of this about “skilled craftspeople”? I don’t know what this means. Many people in science have a particular set of well honed physical skills. Does small animal surgery count? Patching a cell? Making custom electrodes or surgical implant parts? Designing tools or parts to assist with streamlining a research process? Is the accurate preparation of reagents a craft?

Scientists are often craftspeople, often very skilled. Maybe even uniquely skilled. Is the problem that the skills often also come with a bachelor’s or advanced degrees?

Once again, the answer to critique and demands to “reform” the NIH is a simple “they already do that”. That is, if we take the complaints and criticisms at face value and assume they are made in good faith. The next response is “if you want more of this thing they already do, than give the NIH an increase in budget. Otherwise, what specific core activities of the NIH are to be cut to pay for that?

Read the whole story
sarcozona
58 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Sweden to ban ‘forever chemicals’ in clothing

1 Share

Sweden said Thursday it plans to ban so-called “forever chemicals” in consumer products such as clothing and kitchenware as early as 2028, before expected European Union regulation comes into force.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 hour ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

local matchmaker losing it over yet another unrealistic demand from the clientele 🤣🤣

1 Comment

elodieunderglass:

bells-lettres:

local matchmaker losing it over yet another unrealistic demand from the clientele 🤣🤣

Translation by me. :))

“Even a slightly increased possibility of summoning rain is still an ability to summon rain” is such a good point

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 hour ago
reply
🤣🤣
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Every new UK home should have air conditioning, say Liberal Democrats

1 Share

Exclusive: Party says housing stock ‘woefully unprepared’ for extreme heat and new rules for builders must be set

All new UK homes should be built with air conditioning to cope with the effects of the climate crisis, according to the Liberal Democrats.

The party says British homes are dangerously unsuited to rising temperatures, meaning passive cooling measures such as planting more trees in residential areas are necessary.

Continue reading...
Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 hour ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories