plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
19148 stories
·
21 followers

The Social Security Administration Is Gutting Regional Staff and Shifting All Public Communications to X | WIRED

1 Share
Read the whole story
sarcozona
17 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Scientists Need to Speak Out beyond the Classroom and the Lab | Scientific American

1 Share

The day I first set foot on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s campus, an uncharacteristic heat baked the concrete walkways and radiated off the twisted steel facades. The quads were green, empty of students who had fled to air-conditioned lounges. Far off, the pavement seemed to shimmer with possibility. I did too—I felt like I had finally arrived. It was August of 2018. The story of a scientist that had begun at a community college in the Appalachian foothills was reaching its rightful zenith. But just like the ripples on the asphalt, it was a mirage.

The fata morgana on my horizon was the illusion that science is a quiet, orderly, aristocratic thing. Science happened in million-dollar labs at Ivy League institutions—the kind with clean whiteboards, new equipment, and donor names over the doors. I thought science belonged on a pedestal behind a wall. I believed in the myth of the ivory tower.

This isolationist model of science does not serve the society and the moment we live in. Public trust in science has sharply declined since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. In January of 2019, 73 percent of Americans said that science had a “mostly positive effect on society.” By October of 2023, that number had fallen to 57 percent, according to the Pew Research Center. Even though the National Science Foundation reports that support for federal funding of scientific research has remained relatively steady for decades, nearly one in four Americans believe that scientists do not act in the best interest of the public.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Of course, there’s plenty of blame to go around outside the ivory tower. Many of society’s loudest voices decry vaccines or espouse conspiracy theories. With skepticism of mass media at a record high (39 percent of Americans report “no trust at all”), many turn to alternative, unvetted sources of news. One of the most popular podcasts of our era, The Joe Rogan Experience, has tens of millions of listeners across various platforms and hosts antivaccine speakers like Robert Malone, while praising notable antiscience voices such as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Americans also hear from their own members of Congress that global warming is a hoax, evolution is a lie, drinking unpasteurized (“raw”) milk is safe, and the federal government is concealing evidence of aliens. Even state governments cherry-pick the science—or lack thereof—that is included in public K–12 curricula.

Science is uniquely poised to combat the creep of this agenda, but much like a creature finding itself in a hostile new environment, it must adapt. Scientists cannot continue to cordon themselves off from the world and simply expect the public to take their results at face value. If a person hears from a podcaster who says a vaccine will hurt them, but not from a scientist who might explain how it works, why should they take it? For many, surviving in a rapidly changing world means taking fewer risks. It means working with what you trust, what has worked in the past. It means being wary of the unfamiliar. Science is increasingly—intentionally—being pushed out of the realm of what you trust and into the realm of the unfamiliar.

Scientists must resist this push. We owe this to society—to one another—because the people around us created the environment in which we were able to become scientists. We must remember that people who were not scientists built a world where a child who watches the stars barefoot from a hay meadow can grow up to be an astrophysicist.

The ivory tower functions like a black box. Federal funding and faceless men in lab coats go in; vaccines, climate predictions and invasive computer algorithms come out. This starts with the apprenticeship model of education: professors take on one or a few graduate students and train them to become a professor themselves. Arriving at just the selection point is a gauntlet in itself, a playing field tilted in favor of those with wealth, and all the inequities contained within.

In the ascent, students learn to conduct research, to write technical reports and to share high-level results with other scientists—all in the slim hopes of obtaining a permanent academic position. To speak of the realistic job market is taboo. To learn “soft” skills such as public speaking and accessible writing is worthy of scorn. To leave is to fail. As a result, science produces a glut of Ph.D.s without the skills or interest to engage with the real world problems their knowledge could help to solve.

Dismantling the ivory tower for the good of society means challenging the process that creates scientists and the biases that underpin it. The apprenticeship model should not be discarded, but rebuilt, expanded. Graduate programs must shift their focus from minting lengthy resumes to creating scientists who understand the context in which their work belongs. They must stop regarding outreach and science communication as trivial distractions from research, and start making them mandatory, even central elements of the curriculum.

Furthermore, we must shed the elitism that permeates our field. A scientific hierarchy, even one we believe to be meritocratic, always puts the people who need us most at the bottom. And why should anyone listen to someone who is talking down to them? We are not above the public. We are part of it, and we must use our training and our knowledge to better it.

I wish I could bottle the way I felt that hot Cambridge day. I wish I could stash it away, to be enjoyed like a nostalgic perfume. Because as misguided as it was, it felt good. The ivory tower’s siren song promises a safe and certain world, a dishonest picture of science untroubled by the trials of the outside. It’s a mirage, a ghost ship that carries no passengers, an oasis without water. So we must press on without it, through a world that is dark and uncertain and very real. But free of our tower, we have the power to change it.

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

‘Beware a dollar confidence crisis’ — DB

1 Comment

the dollar’s recent weakness could be indicative that these factors are getting swamped by broad and growing international misgivings over the US. The madness behind the methodology of the recent tariffs certainly doesn’t encourage faith in the coherence of US policymaking. Many analysts are alarmed, but probably none more than Deutsche Bank.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
what a time to be alive
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

White House ends funding for key US climate body: ‘No coming back from this’ | Trump administration | The Guardian

1 Share

The White House is ending funding for the body that produces the federal government’s pre-eminent climate report, which summarizes the impacts of rising global temperatures on the United States.

Every four years, the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is required by Congress to release a new national climate assessment to ensure leaders understand the drivers of – and threats posed by – global warming. It is the most comprehensive, far-reaching and up-to-date analysis of the climate crisis, playing a key role in local and national decision making about agriculture, energy production, and land and water use.

The next assessment is due by 2027. But now, Nasa has ended its contract with the consulting firm ICF International, which convened the USGCRP and coordinated the federal agencies that contribute to the quadrennial report.

“There’s really no coming back from this, and it means we are all less informed about climate impacts, and won’t have the most up-to-date information on risks and threats,” said one federal staffer who was engaged in USGCRP activities, and who requested anonymity to avoid retribution. “USGCRP helped me to leverage resources from other agencies for use in my own work. But without these networks, I’m left without a support system and the latest science on climate change.”

The end of the contract, first reported by Politico and confirmed by multiple sources to the Guardian, imperils the federal government’s climate research, say experts.

“The firing of USGCRP staff guts the entire climate research and services ecosystem leaving teetering silos of climate teams, already reeling from federal cuts due to Doge,” the anonymous staffer said.

Another federal worker with knowledge of the program, who was also granted anonymity, said the contract’s cancellation will mean “the Sixth National Climate Assessment is effectively destroyed.”

USGCRP staff who hailed from the 15 federal agencies had all been told to abandon the body; its only remaining staff were from ICF and have now been fired, the second worker said. “Climate research as a whole will be hobbled because USGCRP’s interagency working groups are essential coordinating bodies across the entire government, including and beyond the 15 USGCRP member agencies.”

The move came one day after the rightwing outlet the Daily Wire published an article attacking ICF International saying the firm was “raking in millions to spread climate doom”. Since its publication, the second worker said they had had a “pit in their stomach”.

The attack on the USGCRP and national climate assessment did not come as a surprise. In the Heritage Foundation’s far-right policy blueprint Project 2025, Russ Vought – now Trump’s head of the office and management and budget – called to end the USGCRP or fill it with pro-oil industry members.

Since Trump’s second term began in January, the monthly meetings of delegates to the body from federal agencies have been cancelled, the anonymous worker said. “We were waiting for new principles to be sent from each agency, which never happened, so that could have been a sign in retrospect,” they added.

Andrew Rosenberg, a former Noaa official who is now a fellow at the University of New Hampshire, called the end of the contract “very foolish” and “thoughtless”. National climate assessments provide an important synthesis of “science across fields” – and are not particularly expensive to produce because the authors are all volunteers, he said.

In February, Trump officials also denied US scientists permission to attend a meeting of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s leading climate science entity. The federal government also cancelled its contract with ICF International to maintain US support for and involvement in the body.

“Extreme weather disasters displaced millions of people and caused billions of dollars in damage in 2024 alone,” said Katharine Hayhoe, a Texas Tech University climate scientist who has served as lead author on three national climate assessments. “Given the accelerating pace and scale of climate impacts today, a sustained and more comprehensive national climate assessment process is so essential,” Hayhoe said. “We need it today, to build a better future tomorrow.”

The move is a sign of the Trump administration’s fealty to the fossil fuel industry, said Michael Mann, an eminent US climate scientist. The sector donated in record levels to Trump’s re-election campaign.

“It is pure villainy,” said Mann. “A crime against the planet – arguably, the most profound of all crimes.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Yuriy’s Notebook: Am I Free to Imagine My Future? | The Tyee

1 Share

As I’ve shared here thoughts from my notebook about life in Vancouver as a Ukrainian newcomer, I’ve enjoyed reading the comments some readers post after the articles. Last week one using the name Anne_Ominous noted:

“Yes, freedom to speak one's mind doesn't really feel like freedom unless basic needs are being met. Economic justice and civil rights need to go together before we can call ourselves a free society.”

These words helped me understand the main problem that many Ukrainians face in Canada. We have received freedom here but cannot fully feel it.

In this, my last dispatch, I’ll try to explain what that tension is like for some Ukrainians I’ve come to know here. And why I am writing this from Italy, where I’ve come to ponder whether my future lies in Canada after all.

Per spinas ad astra

During my two years in Vancouver I have talked to many immigrants, not only Ukrainians. Most of them say their lives felt more varied and fulfilling in their home countries. Here their existences have become compressed to mainly working and sleeping between jobs.

Struggling to meet the high cost of living in Vancouver, especially rent, has caused many I’ve met to be physically and mentally exhausted.

When I told an immigrant friend recently that I was planning to live in Italy for a bit and travel around Europe for a few weeks before coming back to Vancouver, he told me he was jealous of my freedom. He explained that he moved to Canada three years ago and recently bought a townhouse in Surrey. Now he plans to work for the next 25 years in two jobs to pay the $4,000-per-month mortgage.

A Ukrainian guy who lived in Canada for three years before deciding to move to Bulgaria draws a lot of readers for his posts on Instagram. His main topic is how hard it was to live in Calgary. He worked two jobs and spent all his earnings buying groceries and renting an apartment in a basement. He could not get used to it and moved with his family to Europe where the cost of living is cheaper.

The Ukrainians who comment on his posts are divided about equally in their opinions. One group criticizes the author for disgracing Ukrainians in front of Canadians, accusing him of laziness and ingratitude. The second group agrees with his view that Canada is not a good country of choice for Ukrainians.

This split in views matches my own conversations with fellow Ukrainians over the past 2 1/2 years I’ve lived in British Columbia. I found it interesting how some of their views changed over time.

Inessa moved to Vancouver from Ukraine in the spring of 2023. Two years ago, she said she had been fooled by her first impressions of Canada.

“Friendly people, life should be comfortable. But then it starts. You can’t get used to the local climate, then these friendly people who always want to help, but in fact there is no result, organizations that do not actually help, but only take up time with their Zoom meetings.

“About work, it’s a nightmare. There is a lot of work, but it is impossible to get a job there because you need to have a ‘perfect’ resumé, a portfolio of work from your previous place of work in Canada and a lot of luck. There is still hope for the best, but: I need to pay rent, I need to buy food, and there is no work yet.”

When I caught up with Inessa recently, she told me she has decided to stay in Canada. It hadn’t been easy, but she was able to find a permanent job and still lives in Vancouver.

Julia moved to British Columbia from Kharkiv, Ukraine. She expected to live in Vancouver, but that changed.

“I found a job that I was looking for in my specialization for a long time. But I had to relocate from Metro Vancouver to Victoria. We had a medium-sized dog. When we started looking in Victoria for housing, it turned out that there were almost no options with a dog. Finally, we rented an apartment in a house but it costs crazy money. All you earn, you give for rent. This is British Columbia...”

And yet Julia enjoys living on Vancouver Island and has no plans to move. She’s now settled in.

Elena lives in Vancouver. She moved from Odesa, Ukraine, where she worked as a journalist, more than two years ago. She told me that in Ukraine she wrote educational, entertainment and marketing items for newspapers, magazines and websites.

“I am very interested in continuing to do this work here. I understand that I do not consider journalism as the main way to earn money here. I just would like not to lose the skill. And I would like to improve my English,” Elena shared with me two years ago. She is still looking for a permanent job.

“I am still in British Columbia,” she told me recently, “trying to survive, although it is difficult. I looked for a job not only as a journalist, but also as a hostess, a waitress, a dishwasher, any unskilled work — I was refused everywhere.”

Olena moved to Vancouver from Kremenchuk, Ukraine.

“We live in Vancouver for two years and three months. I can say that we have adapted. We like to be here. We have been working since the first day in Vancouver, starting with Uber delivery to get money daily. Then we found a permanent job. Well, this path cannot be told in a few words.”

Per spinas ad astra” she writes, quoting the Latin phrase for “through thorns to the stars.”

“Of course, we are missing Europe, but the choice has been made. We are planning to stay here and hope to get permanent resident status in Canada.”

Gaining permanent resident status for Ukrainian newcomers, as I explained in a previous dispatch, is not a sure thing. We have been granted a temporary visa and a work permit for several years. This makes us completely dependent on the political situation in Canada. No one knows how immigration policy towards Ukrainians may change after the federal election is decided on April 28.

The Trump administration’s position on Ukraine is causing us to lose hope for a quick ending of the conflict. Most Ukrainians here expect the dangerous conditions back home will most likely be frozen for many years and may worsen at any moment. But what happens if we suddenly become illegal immigrants here in Canada?

This and other questions run through my mind as I write this on the terrace of an apartment with a stunning view of Lake Como in the lovely town of Bellagio in northern Italy. During the day there are many tourists, and in the evenings, after the last ferry has sailed, I wander the deserted medieval streets, lost in my thoughts.

How has my relationship to Canada changed? Do I want to stay in Vancouver permanently? Do I still feel freedom there?

In order to see some things clearly, you need to look at them from afar.

In Europe, a part of the world that has seen centuries of war and conflict, I come to feel that many Canadians don’t understand how fragile their freedom is and how important it is to protect it. Europeans are all too aware that if a leader in a large neighbouring country begins talking about taking over your nation, it might not be long before foreign troops are marching through your city. What seems ridiculous and unbelievable can become reality at any moment. Believe me, I saw it all in Crimea.

In reacquainting myself with the European lifestyle, I find it refreshingly familiar. Soaking up the culture, I realize this is part of me. I need connection to antiquity and the Renaissance, the museums, ancient ruins, medieval castles, Caravaggio paintings and Bernini statues.

And so I expect to visit Europe from time to time throughout my life.

But the longer I am away from Vancouver, the more I look forward to coming back to the city that is gradually becoming my new home. I appreciate British Columbia’s magnificent nature, clean air, mild climate — and people. Unlike some of the other Ukrainians I’ve spoken to, I find Canadians friendly and responsive. And forward-looking. As I look out at Lake Como, I think of my strolls around Vancouver’s seawall, where I see a certain statue of a famous runner who each time seems to be telling me: Keep going!

A future imagined

As I’ve told you in previous articles, I have found employment in Vancouver’s sanitation department and am optimistic I can figure out how to pay the bills. But only if I am granted the right to live and work in Canada indefinitely. That is the big question looming for me and so many other Ukrainians. I want to be in Canada, but does Canada want the same for me?

I will test that question by applying for permanent residency. I understand that my chances to become a permanent resident of Canada through economic immigration to Canada are low because, while I have higher degrees and management experience, my street cleaning work is not a specialized ability that the government considers in demand. In B.C. the kinds of entry-level skills favoured for permanent residency applicants are hospitality, construction or health care.

I will be applying for permanent residency through a different route — on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. It is a long and difficult path. The processing takes about 22 months, and just over half of those who apply are accepted.

I’ve learned that most often Ukrainians are denied permanent residency on humanitarian and compassionate conditions. This is why I’ve hesitated to follow this path. Like many Ukrainian newcomers, I’ve instead waited for the Canadian government to perhaps create a special program for Ukrainians to obtain permanent residency.

Now, however, I have been motivated to apply by a note a Tyee reader sent to Hedy Fry, the member of Parliament representing Vancouver Centre. The kind reader of my series on The Tyee, who shared their note with a Tyee editor, said: “Yuriy is exactly who Canada needs to help us build a strong future. Please see that his visa is renewed and he’s put on a path to citizenship should he choose to become a full Canadian citizen. We can hope!”

Hope is a powerful thing. But whether I get permanent residency or not will depend on how strong my application will be. I hope the circumstances of my move to Canada and my efforts to adapt and establish life here in Vancouver will help to persuade the immigration officer to approve my application.

If so, I will seek citizenship. I would not want to live in Canada without eventually gaining the right to vote. My experiences in Ukraine tell me that true freedom includes the opportunity to participate fully in political society.

Some days I allow myself to channel hope into a dream. It goes like this: In a few years I celebrate becoming a permanent resident of Canada. A few years later I achieve citizenship. I draw on all I’ve learned as a newcomer who by good fortune and persistence managed to make a life here — and I pour all of this into a career that involves me making positive political change in my adopted country.

I join with my fellow Canadians in making a strong future together. Freedom makes our possibilities limitless!

This series is supported by funding from the Hummingbird Foundation.

Read the entire series.  [Tyee]

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Musk’s Doge fired self-drive car safety experts at agency that regulates Tesla

1 Comment

€69 per month

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

  • Global news & analysis
  • Expert opinion
  • FT App on Android & iOS
  • FT Edit app
  • FirstFT: the day's biggest stories
  • 20+ curated newsletters
  • Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
  • FT Videos & Podcasts
  • 20 monthly gift articles to share
  • Lex: FT's flagship investment column
  • 15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts
  • FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition
Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 days ago
reply
“Job cuts at the US traffic safety regulator instigated by Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency disproportionately hit staff assessing self-driving risks, hampering oversight of technology on which the world’s richest man has staked the future of Tesla.

Of roughly 30 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration workers dismissed in February as part of Musk’s campaign to shrink the federal workforce, many were in the “office of vehicle automation safety”, people familiar with the situation told the Financial Times.”

American roads are about to get way more dangerous
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories