plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20663 stories
·
19 followers

Worker's Death at SpaceX Factory Followed Hundreds of Injuries in Recent Years

1 Share

Around 4 a.m. on May 15, in the 1-year-old South Texas town of Starbase, Jose Luis Bautista, a 25-year-old man from nearby Donna, rode a scissor lift around 50 feet up toward the ceiling of the “Starfactory,” where Elon Musk’s SpaceX makes parts for its Starship rockets. Bautista and other workers with Delta Fabrication and Machine Inc., a contractor out of Daingerfield, needed to replace metal beams supporting the structure of the factory with new ones.

Bautista strapped himself to a white beam that weighed nearly 8,000 pounds and was about 5 stories off the ground. The beam, Bautista’s supervisor would later tell Cameron County sheriff’s officers, had “not been adjusted correctly.” The supervisor, named as Brent Lee Harvey in the sheriff’s office case report, said that he had contacted a foreman, Omar Alvarado, and instructed his team to “properly adjust and secure the beam to the structure.”

According to the report, Bautista was attaching himself to another beam when the one he was already secured to started falling. Alvarado told a sheriff’s investigator that he was on the phone when the beam fell and took Bautista with it. Alvarado further told the investigator that Bautista may have thought the beam was secure because it had anchor bolts already installed on it. Bautista would hit the beam on the way down before falling to the concrete factory floor. 

Harvey said, per the report, that “he did not know why Jose Luis would have attached himself to the improperly secured beam.” Harvey also said that the bolts on the beam were temporary.

Within minutes of Bautista falling, a man described with the acronym “EHS”—likely an environmental health and safety specialist—started doing CPR, and security guards arrived to help load Bautista into one of Starbase’s ambulances, the report states. Doctors would pronounce him dead at a Brownsville hospital the same day. Three days later, after an autopsy, Cameron County would declare his cause of death “multiple blunt force trauma due to a fall.” 

The Cameron County Sheriff’s Office declared Bautista’s death an accident. Initial news reports said Bautista had fallen only 8 feet—rather than the much greater height described in the later sheriff’s office report—based on what hospital staff had told Cameron County Justice of the Peace Mary Sorola. Sorola did not respond to the Observer’s requests for more information about those conversations.

Starbase in 2021 (Ivan Armando Flores/Texas Observer)

It’s unclear whether SpaceX CEO Elon Musk was at Starbase—a name now used both for the newfound company town and the company’s production and launch facilities near Boca Chica Beach—on the day Bautista died. His private jet’s flight log shows his plane flying from Los Angeles to Brownsville on May 21, six days after the incident, and returning to California on May 22, the same day as the last Starship launch. The Starship exploded on May 22, prompting another mishap investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration. Musk hasn’t publicly commented on Bautista’s death. Cameron County Sheriff Manuel Treviño told the Observer in an email that the law enforcement agency gave all the evidence it collected to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

“OSHA is looking at specific violations of standards, so this could be violation of various fall protection standards, or mechanical equipment standards, mechanical lift standards,” Jordan Barab, a former deputy assistant secretary of OSHA during the Obama administration, told the Observer. “OSHA’s probably going to be looking into other things, like training and some structural issues on how the beam was attached.” 

Bautista’s death is the first worker fatality at SpaceX’s South Texas facilities, but there have been numerous injuries there in the last few years. Just among its own employees—not including those working for contractors on-site—SpaceX saw 427 injuries and 9 respiratory illnesses between January 6, 2022, and June 10, 2025, according to documents SpaceX filed with OSHA and acquired by the Observer through a records request. These injuries included concussions, second-degree burns, partial finger amputations, hernias, dislocations, crushed hands, and broken ribs, legs, and ankles. 

OSHA did not release more recent records documenting injuries because they are part of ongoing investigations into incidents at the Starbase facility, one of which is Bautista’s death. 

Another ongoing investigation stems from a crane tipping over at SpaceX’s Massey testing site, which is a little more than five miles west of the factory and the launch pad. Workers were removing debris from a Starship exploding at the test site last year. As the crane fell, its operator jumped out of the cab and onto the ground, according to OSHA records, breaking his pelvis and wrist and receiving a minor head injury. OSHA cited SpaceX eight times for the incident, including a violation for a worker operating a separate crane with an expired license and another for the tipped-over crane not having been inspected in the last year. SpaceX is contesting all of the citations. 

An Observer analysis of injuries at SpaceX’s Starbase in 2025, using OSHA’s publicly available injury data, shows that the company had an injury rate that’s more than five times the national average for comparable space vehicle manufacturing facilities in the United States. The company’s facility in Hawthorne, California, which has more than twice the employees of Starbase, has less than half the injury rate of the South Texas site. OSHA confirmed these calculations as accurate when asked by the Observer.  

Some employees who suffered such injuries have filed lawsuits against SpaceX in Cameron County courts, many of which are still pending and have yet to see trial. This includes a former worker who had his leg crushed from being run over by a boom lift, another who got head injuries from a falling ladder, and another who fell into an improperly lit open pit. 

One open lawsuit, from San Benito resident Doroteo Perez, describes an incident that is similar to the circumstances of Bautista’s fall. Perez, who was an employee for a contractor working at Starbase in 2024, alleges that SpaceX personnel told him a piece of machinery he was dismantling was “structurally sound” before he began to dismantle it. “As soon as the Plaintiff began cutting, the structural piece collapsed upon Plaintiff’s person,” the lawsuit states. Perez’s attorney, Richard Zayas, did not respond to requests for comment about the case.

An ad with the text: Get the magazine by becoming a member today.Advertisement

In the sheriff’s office case report from May, both Bautista’s foreman and superintendent point to Bautista being responsible for his own safety. Barab said it’s common for employers to shift blame for an incident to an employee, but that it usually doesn’t work as a defense.

“The employer has to prove that the employee was well trained, well supervised, well equipped, and violated the employer’s safety rules anyway,” Barab said. “Generally the employer also has to prove that employees who committed similar offenses have been disciplined in the past as well.”

According to the report, Bautista had only previously been warned to properly adjust his safety glasses, with Harvey and Alvarado both saying that Bautista didn’t have prior safety violations. 

“As management, you’re responsible to make sure that your crew and the people that are about to be on this task are fully aware of what’s going on,” a former foreman who worked on similar jobs at Starbase last year—and who requested anonymity out of fear of job-related consequences because they still work in the same industry—told the Observer. “In a situation like that, they should have been right there.”

The same ex-foreman noted that OSHA would likely be investigating whether there was a Job Safety Analysis (JSA) for the work Bautista was doing. Treviño, the Cameron County sheriff, when asked whether his investigators looked at a JSA, told the Observer: “not to my knowledge.” 

The City of Starbase and SpaceX did not respond to questions about Bautista’s death from the Observer. Neither did Delta Fabrication and Machine, Inc. 

Elon Musk, beside the right-wing president of Argentina in February 2025, wears a MAGA hat and wields a chainsaw, symbolizing his short-lived but destructive tenure leading DOGE. (Shutterstock)

In 2024, SpaceX was named one of the nonprofit National Council for Occupational Safety and Health’s “Dirty Dozen,” after reporting from Reuters showed the Starbase site had hundreds of injuries, many of them not reported to OSHA.

“SpaceX is one of the richest and most powerful companies in the world. It has access to extraordinary resources, cutting-edge technology, and some of the most advanced engineers on the planet,” Jessica E. Martinez, the executive director of the nonprofit, told the Observer in a statement. “There is simply no excuse for workers being exposed to preventable hazards. Whether someone is a direct employee or a contract worker, their life should never be treated as expendable.”

OSHA is expected to take up to six months to conclude its investigation into Bautista’s death.  The agency rejected a records request for documents because its investigation is ongoing.

Meanwhile, less than a month after Bautista’s death, SpaceX went public, raising $75 billion in its record-breaking initial offering. The company’s stock valuation briefly made Musk the first trillionaire in world history.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
34 seconds ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Ukraine’s vibe shift is bad news for Russia’s economy

1 Comment
Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Good luck Ukraine!!
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Climate Analytics | As heatwave sweeps Europe, study warns of growing…

1 Share

As a powerful heatwave grips Europe this week, new research underscores the economic costs incurred when extreme heat strikes regions already affected by drought, and shows how climate change is increasing those costs.

The Climate Analytics study shows that combined heat-and-drought events already reduce average household incomes by almost 3% across Europe, with much larger losses in the hardest-hit regions. It reveals that rising global temperatures will widen income inequality and put millions more Europeans at risk of poverty. If global warming reaches 2.7°C by 2100, as is likely under current policies and action worldwide, the average European household will see its income fall by 27%. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C, the Paris Agreement commitment, would slash this to 7%.

Jessie Schleypen, Senior Climate Change and Development Economist at Climate Analytics and lead author of this study, said, “The massive heatwave now sweeping across Europe is already threatening people’s health, livelihoods and ability to work.

Where extreme heat coincides with drought, the damage can be much greater. Our research shows that these compound events amplify economic losses experienced directly by European households, and they will become more frequent as global warming increases.”

The research analysed data from 2004–2022, and shows that the combined impact of heatwaves and drought is much greater than the sum of the individual events: on average a heatwave in Europe will reduce household incomes by 0.7% and droughts by 1.8%. When they occur together – particularly in drought-stricken regions – the average income loss rises to nearly 3%. Some of the factors driving the decline in incomes include worsening health conditions and reduction in labor productivity, decline in food production and water-related critical services such as transport and energy generation.

Climate change will widen Europe’s income gap further
Published in Global Environmental Change as part of the ACCREU project, the study also shows these effects are not felt evenly.

“The poorest 20% will be affected the most, with incomes dropping 2% more than the rest of the population (4% vs 1.1-1.8%), further widening income inequality,” Schleypen says.

Regions that experienced far more heat waves and droughts between 2004 and 2022 were estimated to have much greater reductions in household income, with Madrid peaking at an almost 10% drop, Central Hungary seeing a 9.4% drop and Central Spain an 8.8% drop.

The increased impact of heatwaves and drought under climate change could mean 60 million people in Europe at risk of poverty in a 1.5°C world, rising to 127 million in a 2.7°C world.

These impacts would also be distributed unevenly, with Greece, Spain, Romania, Bulgaria and Cyprus likely to be among the most affected countries: at 2.7°C of global warming, Spanish household incomes would fall by more than one-third, and Greek household incomes by more than one-half.

“As heat and drought conditions worsen with climate change, so too will the economic impact on Europe’s most vulnerable,” Schleypen says.

Graph showing income drops in eight countries as temperatures rise

Unprepared for impacts
Despite decades of science showing the impacts of continued burning of fossil fuels, Europe remains largely unprepared for the climate impacts its emissions have helped create.

The UK government’s statutory adviser, the Climate Change Committee, said last month that the government’s adaptation plans dating back to 2008 ‘have not been fit for purpose,’ while the French government’s adviser the Haut Conseil pour le Climat said last year that the gap between adaptation needs and adaptation actions is widening.

And in Germany, a Climate Analytics study for the World Bank, published in January 2026, concluded that Germany ‘lacks comprehensive solutions’ to protect people from the increasing heat stress impacts. Despite some slow regional progress in developing heat-health adaptation plans, implementation is still largely lagging. 

Climate Analytics
Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Eight vaccines linked to a lower risk of dementia

1 Comment

 

 

At a glance

  • Multiple large observational studies have found that routine adult vaccines are associated with a reduced risk of dementia, with some showing risk reductions of 25% to 40%.
  • The strongest evidence exists for shingles, flu, RSV, pneumococcal and diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis-containing (DTP) vaccines.
  • Researchers believe vaccination may reduce dementia risk by preventing infections that cause brain inflammation, though some evidence points to a more general immune effect.

More than 57 million people worldwide are living with dementia and, according to the World Health Organization, there are 10 million new cases every single year.

But over the past few years, a striking pattern has emerged from large population studies: vaccinations can be protective against dementia. The effect has now been observed across multiple vaccines, multiple countries and millions of people.

Viral infections can trigger long-lasting inflammation in the body, which then extends to the brain. That inflammation can damage the ability of brain cells to communicate with each other which, in turn, can lead to cognitive impairment and memory loss, leading to dementia.

The rationale behind vaccines protecting neurodegenerative diseases like dementia and Alzheimer’s comes from the way that viral infections can affect our brain.

Dementia is not a single disease, but a term for a cluster of symptoms, including memory loss and cognitive decline, that can have many causes. Alzheimer’s disease is the most common of those causes, accounting for an estimated 60-70% of cases.

Several viruses including herpes simplex virus type 1 (that causes cold sores), chickenpox virus (varicella zoster virus that also causes shingles) and SARS-CoV-2 (which causes COVID-19) have all been linked to a higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia after infection.

Viral infections can trigger long-lasting inflammation in the body, which then extends to the brain. That inflammation can damage the ability of brain cells to communicate with each other which, in turn, can lead to cognitive impairment and memory loss, leading to dementia.

Here are eight vaccines that have been shown to have a protective effect against dementia.

1. Shingles

The shingles vaccine has the most replicated evidence of any vaccine for dementia risk reduction.

A 2024 study in Nature Medicine found that the recombinant shingles vaccine Shingrix was associated with a significantly lower risk of dementia than the older live vaccine Zostavax, which has since been discontinued in the USA.

A key difference between the two is that Shingrix contains an ingredient called AS01, an adjuvant designed to boost the immune response.

A follow-up study from the same group, published in NPJ Vaccines in 2025, tracked more than 436,000 people and found an 18% reduction in dementia diagnoses over 18 months in those who received the shingles vaccine.

Visit our new YouTube channel that goes under the hood of immunity to explain how vaccines train your body to fight disease. Using clear, engaging storytelling, we explore how vaccines work, the history of major outbreaks and the science that protects us every day.

2. RSV

The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine is a relatively new addition to adult immunisation schedules, but it has already been linked to dementia protection.

The Oxford NPJ Vaccines study found a 29% reduction in dementia risk over 18 months in those who received the RSV vaccine, Arexvy.

What makes this finding particularly interesting is that Arexvy contains the same AS01 adjuvant as the shingles vaccine, Shingrix. The fact that both vaccines showed similar levels of protection, despite targeting completely different viruses, led the researchers to suggest that the adjuvant itself may play a direct role in lowering dementia risk.

3. Flu

Flu vaccination has been studied more extensively than any other vaccine in relation to dementia.

A 2022 study published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease analysed nearly two million people aged 65 and older and found that those who received at least one flu vaccine were 40% less likely to develop Alzheimer’s over four years. The more frequently people were vaccinated, the greater the protection.

In April 2026, the same team published new findings in Neurology showing that a high-dose flu vaccine, which contains four times the antigen of the standard jab, was linked to a 55% reduced risk.

That finding comes from a single retrospective study and will need replication, but it adds to a consistent body of evidence around influenza vaccination and cognitive protection.

4. DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis)

A 2023 study in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease found that adults aged 65 and over who received the tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdap) or Td (without pertussis) vaccine were 30% less likely to develop Alzheimer’s over an eight-year follow-up.

A meta-analysis in Frontiers in Immunology, pooling data from 17 studies and more than 1.8 million people, had uncovered a similar finding in 2022: the risk of developing dementia was reduced by 31%.

A more recent meta-analysis in Age and Ageing (2025), covering 104 million participants, confirmed the association, showing a 33% reduction.

DTP is one of the most widely administered vaccines in the world, so even a modest protective effect against dementia would have enormous public health implications.

5. Pneumococcal

The same 2023 study found a 27% reduced risk of Alzheimer’s in adults who had received the pneumococcal vaccine.

A 2025 Age and Ageing meta-analysis, which pooled data from 21 studies covering 104 million participants, also found a significant association.

Fewer independent studies have examined pneumococcal vaccination than shingles or flu, but the consistency of the finding across both a large cohort and a major meta-analysis suggests the association is worth investigating further.

6. Hepatitis A

Hepatitis A vaccination was among the vaccines identified in the Cambridge review as protective.

The Frontiers in Immunologymeta-analysis indicated a 22% lower risk of dementia. A systematic review from the University of Cambridge in January 2025 analysed 14 studies drawing on health records from roughly 130 million people.

Among its findings, vaccinations against hepatitis A, typhoid and the combined hepatitis A and typhoid vaccine were all associated with a lower risk of dementia.

A Welsh population study by Wilkinson and colleagues, published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, found that receiving both the typhoid and hepatitis A vaccines together was associated with a greater reduction in risk than either vaccine on its own.

That pattern, where combining vaccines appears to offer more protection, shows up repeatedly across the research.

7. Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B vaccination appeared in the same Frontiers in Immunology meta-analysis, with a hazard ratio of 0.82, indicating an 18% lower risk of dementia.

The Cambridge systematic review also flagged the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine as showing a greater protective effect than either alone.

This is consistent with a broader pattern in the literature where receiving multiple different vaccinations appears to be associated with a lower risk than receiving just one, though researchers caution that this could also reflect the healthy vaccinee effect rather than a biological mechanism.

8. Typhoid

Typhoid vaccination was linked to a 20% reduced risk of dementia in the Frontiers in Immunology meta-analysis and in the Cambridge systematic review.

The original data on typhoid came from the Welsh population study by Wilkinson and colleagues, which examined the association between all prescription medications and dementia incidence across more than half a million people. Of 744 medications analysed, only four were associated with a lower risk of dementia, and all four were vaccines.

These are not vaccines that most adults receive as part of their standard immunisation schedule. But the fact that they show a similar pattern to the five routine vaccines above is notable and adds weight to the idea that the protective effect may not be specific to any single pathogen.

Why might vaccines protect the brain?

Researchers are still working to untangle the mechanisms, and there are several theories that are not mutually exclusive.

The most straightforward is that vaccines prevent infections, and infections cause inflammation that can damage the brain.

A Korean nationwide cohort study published in Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy in 2024 found that both herpes simplex and varicella zoster virus infections were independently associated with an increased risk of dementia, with a particularly elevated risk in people who experienced both.

An Italian population study of more than 130,000 people, published in The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease in 2025, found a 13% increased risk of dementia following severe shingles.

And a 2025 study in Nature Medicine led by researchers at Imperial College London and the UK Dementia Research Institute found that people who had previously contracted COVID-19 showed increased levels of blood biomarkers linked to amyloid build-up in the brain, which is linked to Alzheimer’s disease, with effects comparable to four years of ageing.

By stopping or reducing the severity of these infections, vaccines may be preventing the neuro-inflammation that contributes to cognitive decline.

A second theory focuses on what some researchers call non-specific effects of vaccination: the idea that vaccines can have broader effects on the immune system beyond protection against a single pathogen.

The Oxford finding that the AS01 adjuvant may itself reduce dementia risk supports this. The NPJ Vaccines study notes that AS01 activates macrophages and dendritic cells and triggers the production of interferon gamma, a molecule that has been shown in mouse models to reduce amyloid plaque deposits.

Whether this mechanism translates to humans is not yet established. A 2026 review in Frontiers in Immunology proposed a broader immunological model for how vaccines might protect against dementia, drawing on evidence from AS01 vaccines, BCG and other immunisations.

A third possibility is the healthy vaccinee effect: people who get vaccinated might be more likely overall to look after their health, and that broader health advantage may explain at least part of the observed risk reduction.

This remains the most important caveat. Most studies adjust for this, and several have found that the association persists after controlling for income, comorbidities and other health behaviours.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
6 days ago
reply
Get your shots!
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Mona Khalil, Who Devoted Her Life To Protecting Turtles, Killed By Israeli Airstrike | Defector

1 Share

For half a century, a house on the coast in southern Lebanon has kept vigil over Al-Mansouri beach and the blue Mediterranean waters beyond. Mona Khalil's grandfather built the house in the 1970s, around seven miles from the border with Israel. A decade later, the Khalil family fled the Lebanese Civil War and left the house behind. Khalil eventually settled in the Netherlands and found work as a porcelain restorer. In 1999, on a visit to her grandparents' old home, Khalil walked along the shores, a beer in hand, when she heard a soft crunch. She watched, mesmerized, as a sea turtle lugged herself across the sand to lay her eggs, each soft and white and big as a ping-pong ball.

This turtle altered the course of Khalil's life. After she learned Lebanon's sea turtles were under threat, she devoted her days to protecting them. The following year, Khalil moved back into the house, which she painted tangerine—a tribute to the safe haven she had found in the Netherlands—and transformed into a conservation hub with a partner, a woman named Habiba Fayed. This became the Orange House Project, a bed and breakfast where guests could help clean litter off the beach, watch for turtle tracks, and monitor nests. In a 2017 interview, Khalil vowed to continue this work "as long as God gives me life."

Earlier this month, on June 4, an Israeli airstrike hit the Orange House and grievously wounded Khalil and burned another woman. On June 19, the 76-year-old Khalil died of her injuries, one of the 4,175 people killed in Israeli attacks across Lebanon since March 2. (Lebanon's health ministry does not distinguish between civilian and combatant deaths.)

The vibrant orange home was a conspicuous civilian target. And Khalil, who was one of the most esteemed conservationists in Lebanon, was a conspicuous civilian. Over her years working with the turtles, she made some enemies, chiefly property developers and fishers who used dynamite fishing, a practice Khalil successfully fought against. She was shot at with assault rifles. People tried to burn down her house. For her work, she was beloved by her community of environmentalists, whose tributes have poured in since her death. "The strike targeted a site that had long been known for environmental conservation, biodiversity protection, and public awareness," the Lebanese wildlife conservation group Green Southerners wrote in a statement. "Her death stands as a stark reminder of the devastating toll that Israeli attacks continue to exact on civilians, environmental defenders, and the natural heritage they sought to protect."

On the day Khalil died, Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire. But such agreements have never stopped Israel from bombing. Since a ceasefire was declared in the Gaza Strip in October 2025, Israel has violated the agreement at least 3,300 times, per Al Jazeera. It is now turtle nesting season, but it is unclear when the volunteers Khalil trained will be able to return to the beach to keep watch as the turtles enter the world in the most vulnerable stage of their lives.

Conservation takes many forms. It can involve political advocacy or laboratory research. The conservation work Khalil did might best be described as labor. Each day during sea turtle nesting season, which spans roughly May through October, Khalil woke before dawn to walk the beach. She placed metal grates above any eggs she found to secure them from hungry foxes, dogs, and crabs until they hatched. She watched for the tracks of adult turtles and moved eggs away from the surf in times of high-tide flooding. She was trained by scientists from the Mediterranean Association to Save the Sea Turtles (MEDASSET), presented her data at conferences, and shared it with conservation groups. She held beach cleanups, did television interviews, and wrote monitoring guidelines for future volunteers. She invited families vacationing in the area to join her on her morning patrols and taught them about the turtles, their habitat, and the threats they face.

Mona al-Khalil (R) and Habiba Fayed collect turtle eggs and baby marine turtles 26 August 2004 at Mansuri beach, about 95 kms south of Beirut.Habiba Fayed and Khalil collecting turtle eggs at Al-Mansouri Beach in 2004.Joseph Barrak/AFP via Getty Images

Both endangered green sea turtles and loggerhead turtles nest at Al-Mansouri beach, where gardenias and pink bougainvillea grow wild. For millions of years, female turtles have hauled their heavy bodies out of the water to lay their eggs in the sand. For millions of years, hatchling turtles have scurried to the safety of the open water while dodging the hungry mouths of predators. Although Al-Mansouri beach is small, less than a mile long, it has become one of the last undeveloped havens for nesting turtles amid the factories and beach clubs that dominate Lebanon's shores, with one resort built just a 15-minute walk away. In one 2005 paper assessing the turtles of Al-Mansouri for MEDASSET, Khalil called for the beach to be given legal protection and defined as a national park. "Southern Lebanon is the least developed part of the country and has been devastated by the war," the authors wrote. "Effective protection and management is essential in the region before these pristine beaches are overrun."

Pristine did not mean clean. Khalil and Fayed found needles, syringes, and medicine bottles with labels in Hebrew, Arabic, and Greek. They found diapers, plastic cups, and picnic paraphernalia. Khalil suspected that much of this trash was swept in by coastal winds from rubbish dumps less than a kilometer away. All this litter was unsightly for people and treacherous for the hatchlings, which often became entangled in refuse. The trash also sheltered scavenging ghost crabs that preyed on the baby turtles.

In her conservation work, Khalil recognized one of the brutal ironies of Israeli occupation of south Lebanon, which officially ended in 2000 and restarted this year. The military occupation kept the beaches free of development for decades, which ensured the turtles would have empty beaches on which to nest. Khalil wrote about how the nesting beaches of Northern Sinai experienced widespread tourist development after the end of Israeli occupation there, and worried the same would be true for south Lebanon.

In a 2013 paper, Khalil and colleagues wrote about how Al-Mansouri had changed over the years. They observed how the beach had eroded, with a stretch of sand more than 500 feet long reduced to a rocky shelf. They referenced plans to build a tourist resort on the land next to Al-Mansouri. A new private beach house flooded the beach with bright security lights that disorient hatchlings, which evolved to follow the light of the moon and stars sparkling on the surface of the sea. As Khalil and colleagues placed the protective metal cages over clutches of turtle eggs, they installed signs reading: "Will you help us protect the sea turtles nests? Please Do Not Disturb." They were signed, "Friends of the Sea Turtles."

Mona Khalil, a conservation specialist who behind the Orange House Project, holds a small turtle to be released into the sea at al-Mansouri beach near Lebanon's southern city of Tyre,Khalil holds a turtle hatchling to be released to the sea off the coast of Lebanon.Mahmoud Zayyat/AFP via Getty Images

By this time, Khalil had ensured Al-Mansouri's recognition as one of the most important sea turtle nesting spots along the Lebanese coast. She and her colleagues called for formal protections, such as the removal of old army structures, barriers to keep cars off the beach, and a local awareness program that encourages locals to take part in the conservation work. "Any conservation project will ultimately only succeed with the involvement of the local community," the authors wrote. What the authors meant by this is that many of the people of southern Lebanon live in poverty, a socioeconomic strain that has persisted since Israeli occupation. North of Al-Mansouri beach, the city of Tyre—also often referred to by its Arabic name, Sour—is home to three Palestinian refugee camps. Local fishers, farmers, and refugees will not care about the livelihoods of sea turtles if their own livelihoods remain imperiled. Khalil knew she alone could not save the turtles; if they stood a chance at survival, she needed not just to make people care about them, but to see their futures as entangled. She wanted people to understand the health of the fisheries impacted every species in the area, human and non-human. She wanted to rebuild the infrastructure of the region, for the good of all—turtles and people.

In the turtle nesting season of 2006, Khalil had persisted in her work despite heavy Israeli bombing. When Khalil and Fayed encountered Hezbollah fighters on one patrol, the two asked them to leave to prevent an Israeli strike. "They agreed—albeit perplexed about what two middle-aged Lebanese women staying in a war zone to look after sea turtles might be thinking," Khalil wrote in the State of the World's Sea Turtles 2007 report. "The turtles paid no heed to the strife, but our own plight became starker, with no electricity and constant explosions," she wrote.

When an Israeli strike destroyed her neighbor's house, costing Khalil some of her hearing, she and Fayed fled to safety in Beirut. When they returned, they found the Orange House had also been hit by a shell. But Khalil and Fayed found Al-Mansouri had evaded the worst of the war's pollution—up to 15,000 tons of fuel oil that spilled from a bombed power plant to the north. They estimated around 5,000 turtle hatchlings made it to sea that year. And Khalil made a statue from the fragments of the Israeli shell that hit her home.

A sea turtle hatchling is released at Mansouri beach, Southern Lebanon, into the Mediterranean SeaA hatchling released by Khalil and Fayed at Al-Mansouri reaches the surf.CC by-sa 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In a 2013 interview, Khalil said she wished to remain in the Orange House for the rest of her life. She considered it her heaven on Earth. She made jam from whichever fruits were ripest in the groves surrounding the bed and breakfast: strawberry, grapefruit, passion fruit. She wanted the Orange House to be a haven for people and turtles. "It's a place that nobody is going to judge them, so long as they respect the nature," Khalil said in the interview. "Homosexuals, lesbians, whatever—nobody will judge them here." In this recent bout of war, Khalil refused to leave her house despite its proximity to Israeli forces, her relatives told The New Arab.

As baby turtle hatchlings dash toward the waves, they imprint upon the magnetic field of their home nest so that they might return to lay their own eggs after decades spent exploring the open sea. There is an easy allegory here: Some species inherit magnetic signatures from their forebears, others seaside homes. Both Khalil and the turtles she worked to save felt compelled to return to a shared homeland that had changed irrevocably since their youth. The beach at Al-Mansouri has borne the terrors of airstrikes, pollution, and foxes, but it has also felt the presence of protectors who woke before sunrise to give the most vulnerable a better future. Khalil spent years fighting for a world where no individual should be displaced from their home, and her legacy lives on in the people and turtles who will return to the beach despite certain peril, who labor to shield the lives of those yet to be born.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
6 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Prairieland ICE Protesters Sentenced to Decades in Prison – Mother Jones

1 Share
Three people hold signs reading free Benjamin Song, free Zachary Evetts and free Ines Soto around a large banner reading this is a show trial on a street corner

Demonstrators in support of the Prairieland defendants outside a federal courthouse in Fort Worth, Texas, March 13, 2026.Kevin Krause/Dallas Morning News/Getty

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

On Tuesday, eight protesters who the Justice Department accused of having connections to antifa were sentenced to decades in federal prison over a shooting outside a Texas immigration detention center that left one police officer wounded. 

The demonstrator who was convicted of shooting and wounded the officer, former US Marine Corps reservist Benjamin Song, was convicted of attempted murder in March and received a 100-year prison term. Seven other protesters received sentences ranging from 30 to 70 years. 

US District Judge Reed O’Connor, a George W. Bush nominee, said the defendants in what has become known as the Prairieland trial, didn’t participate in a protest but “an assault on democracy.”

Justice Department prosecutors under the Trump administration have made extensive use of wide-ranging conspiracy charges in cases like Prairieland, where some of the defendants who received decades-long sentences were not involved with the planning of the protest in question and left when guards at the facility asked them to.

As my colleague Schuyler Mitchell wrote in September, the Trump administration signed a September 22 executive order designating “antifa” a domestic terrorist organization and a memo three days later, known as NSPM-7, assigning federal agencies to “investigate, prosecute, and disrupt” protesters engaging in “anti-capitalism,” “anti-fascism,” and “anti-Americanism.” The Prairieland trial was one of the first tests of the White House’s ability to make such claims stick.

The defendants, who were protesting the Prairieland immigration detention center in Alvarado, Texas, denied that they were affiliated with antifa, a decentralized term for various left-wing activists and anti-fascist groups, and were demonstrating in support of immigrants being detained at the facility.

In November, seven other defendants who were present at Prairieland pleaded guilty to federal charges of providing material support for terrorism or damaging property. 

The Trump administration has deployed allegations of terrorism against protesters at an unprecedented scale. As my colleague Sophie Hurwitz pointed out, the Justice Department charged 15 Minneapolis-area residents last week with felony “conspiracy to impede or injure federal officers,” and secured a conviction on the same charges against three Spokane, Washington, protesters. Both groups protested ICE facilities.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
6 days ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories