plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20809 stories
·
19 followers

Trans Couple Brutalized At Louisiana Park Bathroom, Then Charged By Police

1 Share
CAPTION: Images of Aurora Rush and Shae Sanders over the years. Courtesy of Shae Sanders.

Content Note: This article depicts images and descriptions of violence against transgender people. Reader discretion is advised.

On May 31, Aurora Rush and Shae Sanders would do something that would forever change the course of their lives: The couple, both of whom are transgender, would use a public restroom in Bossier Parish, Louisiana.

Louisiana does not have an anti-trans bathroom ban on the books that would prohibit the pair from using their restroom of choice at the park, so this was wholly legal. Nonetheless, Sanders and Rush told Erin in the Morning that a mob of people at Cypress Black Bayou Park would exact revenge for this perceived transgression by beating them so severely that Sanders lost consciousness.

Sanders was taken to the hospital in an ambulance, where they needed four stitches above their eye. Rush sustained injuries all over her body, including a concussion, but she wasn’t taken to a hospital. Instead, police took her to a men’s jail. Erin in the Morning could not find evidence that anyone else was arrested that day, and the Sheriff’s Office would not immediately provide those details. Sanders was charged with one count of disturbing the peace, and Rush with two—one for “fighting” and the other for the purported use of offensive language—meaning they face fines and up to six months or one year in prison, respectively, if convicted.

They say they didn’t even punch back. Still, a plea deal may help them avoid jailtime. But Sanders and Rush aren’t signing.

“I’m more angry at the response of the Bossier Parish Sheriff’s Office than I am at the people who beat us up,” Rush said. “They further victimized me. I cannot just go to court, sign a piece of paper, pay a couple hundred dollars in fines, and let it just go away like it never happened. It’s an egregious miscarriage of justice.”

In the weeks that followed the incident, the Police Jury—state nomenclature for what other parts of the country might call a county board of executives—unanimously voted for one of the most punitive anti-trans bathroom bans in the country, reportedly at the request of Bossier Parish Sheriff Julian Whittington himself. He was not available for comment ahead of publishing for this piece.

Courtney Newburry, the couple’s attorney, said that in her opinion, what happened to her clients is nothing less than a hate crime.

“I believe the facts will show that this attack was targeted, calculated, had been simmering all day, and is the direct result of the dangerous and harmful rhetoric that demonizes and dehumanizes transgender people,” she told Erin in the Morning. “I believe the facts will show that the attackers had made a determination as to Aurora’s gender and that determination led them to believe they had the power to do what they did; that they believed themselves to be the heroes here.”

It began as a stereotypical “all-American summer day,” Rush recalls; friends gathered lakeside, had hot dogs grilled over an open flame, and tried to cool off from the relentless Louisiana sun.

But this is Trump’s America, meaning transgender people are being subjected to new and creative terror campaigns every single day. Even Rush, who has been living as a transgender woman in the deep south for over a decade, was blindsided by what happened next.

Rush had stepped away from the festivities to use the women’s room, and returned to the lake without incident. The day came to a quiet end. Then the couple parted from their friends and began walking back to their car, but first, Sanders needed the restroom. They are nonbinary, but assigned female at birth, so they often feel safest using the women’s room. They handed some belongings to Rush so that she could wait outside the building with it.

In Rush’s telling, that’s when a man began harassing her. She had never met him before; she didn’t recognize him. But as she walked back to her car in the parking lot, he followed. She said he threatened her if she entered the women’s room, called her slurs, and tried to goad her into a fight. Rush put her belongings down in her car, and returned to a pavilion area outside of the women’s room to wait for Sanders, and the man kept following her, she said.

But in the time it took Sanders to finish and wash their hands, a crowd of about ten people had formed. Sanders remembers emerging from the building to see their partner terrified, trapped at the center of a circle of men and women alike screaming profanities and threats. “It was every single hateful thing you can come up with that people say to a trans person,” Sanders said.

Sanders had to push past the crowd because, in addition to surrounding Rush, they were blocking the exit.

Sanders put their arm around Rush and tried to leave, but people blocked them.

What followed was a stream of vitriol. They allegedly called Rush a “tranny” and a “faggot.” They allegedly said they would stop Rush from entering the bathroom by any means necessary. They allegedly threatened to murder Rush. And they allegedly said they were protecting the children.

“I was in a total, complete, closed up circle,” Rush said. “There was no getting out of it. I could feel people behind me breathing down my neck.”

“We knew, at that point, that we were pretty much screwed,” Sanders said.

CAPTION: Shae Sanders after they and their partner say they experienced an anti-trans attack in Bossier Parish, Louisiana.

It’s not totally clear why the beating stopped, but evidently, a parks employee called the police. Sanders had been knocked unconscious and needed stitches for a gash above their eye. They were taken away in an ambulance. Rush sat in her car as police questioned her and others at the scene.

Both maintain they didn’t even really fight back; more than anything, they weren’t in fighting condition. Rush lives off of disability benefits because of a hip injury; she has trouble lifting heavy objects and moving one of her legs. Sanders has a structural defect in their spinal cord. An injury as mild as whiplash could render them in need of emergency surgery. After the ordeal at Cypress Bayou, they were blind in one eye for several days—the product of a scratched cornea.

Sanders is also medically vulnerable due to a neurostim implant in their shoulder—a device similar to a pacemaker, but connected to the brain instead of the heart. Doctors are still trying to determine if the attack damaged the wires, which could kill them.

Rush also incurred head trauma, scratches, contusions, and massive welts; one knot above her knee swelled to the size of an apple. Blood pooled around her eyes, a sign of a concussion. But the physical injuries were compounded by the moral ones.

The worst part, for Rush, may have been when officers approached her car, told her to step out of her vehicle, and informed her that she was under arrest. Despite the “female” gender marker on Rush’s driver’s license, they took her to a men’s jail, had her patted down and searched by a male guard, and initially booked her under a man’s name—and not even one she had ever used or heard of.

A photo she shared with Erin in the Morning appears to show a plastic bag where they had collected her belongings, labelled with a moniker she didn’t recognize. The name is crossed out and her proper, legal name is scrawled underneath. Upon her release from police custody, she looked up the name on Facebook, and she immediately recognized the face staring back at her.

It was one of the men, she says, who had attacked her.

CAPTION: A leg injury Aurora Rush says she maintained during an anti-trans attack in Bossier Parish. A contusion on her leg swelled to the size of an apple. She also suffered from two black eyes.

Rush and Sanders were scheduled for arraignment on July 15, but that date was changed at the last minute. Their next court date is expected to be in August, Newburry told Erin in the Morning.

Coincidentally, July 15 was also the date the Bossier Parish police jury voted unanimously in favor of Ordinance No. 22—a resolution that would impose criminal sanctions on anyone accused of being in a gendered bathroom that deviates from their sex assigned at birth, and who refuses to leave upon request. It covers any bathroom, locker room, or changing room owned or operated by the Parish, including at courthouses, government buildings, and public parks.

It cited the passage of the Women’s Safety and Protection Act, a bill pushed by anti-trans activists “establishing definitions relating to biological sex and recognizing the authority of governmental entities to maintain separate accommodations based upon biological sex,” a resolution from the July 15 police jury meeting reads.

Ordinance No. 22 would require any and all municipal employees, from police officers to janitors, to monitor bathrooms for suspected trans people using the “wrong” one. If an employee fails to eject the individual whose gender or sex has been called into question, then they must be met with disciplinary action, the ordinance reads.

And if a trans person, or presumed-trans person, does not leave upon request from a stranger making assumptions about their gender, genitals, and biological make-up, then they could face criminal charges and up to a year in jail. The criminal charges and threat of incarceration make it perhaps the most severe anti-trans local bathroom policy in the country.

It’s also unclear whether the ordinance is actually in effect; government officials gave Erin in the Morning different answers when asked. Initially local news reports said there would be a final vote on Aug. 5; several jurors told Erin in the Morning the adoption was final; the Parish attorney did not respond to requests for comment; the Sheriff’s office said it had not yet been adopted at all.

A document posted ahead of this week’s Aug. 5 meeting indicates they will consider having another public hearing; nobody showed up to testify at the first one. The ACLU of Louisiana sent the governing body a letter alleging it didn’t properly advertise the vote, violating Open Meetings Laws, and that they would need to restart the process. If that resolution passes, then there will be an opportunity for public comment on the matter scheduled for Sept. 2, Parish documents indicate.

Now, community groups are mobilizing both to support Rush and Sanders and to challenge Ordinance No. 22. “Things have gotten bad,” said Peyton Michelle Rose, executive director for the statewide advocacy group Louisiana Trans Advocates. “But we’ve already had it bad. We’re used to standing up for ourselves.”

Meanwhile, multiple jurors told Erin in the Morning that the ordinance was requested by Bossier Parish Sheriff Julian Whittington himself in the weeks following what happened to Rush and Sanders.

“There was nothing on the books for him to do as law enforcement,” juror Glenn Benton said in an interview. “That’s why he asked us to do it.”

For Rush and Sanders, the uphill climb that remains is not just legal or political. They continue to struggle with chronic health problems as a result of the physical assault they experienced. They are still adjusting to their new normal of chronic migraines, shifting court dates, mounting medical bills, and severe PTSD.

“I am a completely different person,” Sanders said. “I am terrified now. I’ve never been scared like this before.”

CAPTION: Shae Sanders in the hospital after the apparent trans bashing at Cypress Bayou. They needed four stitches above their eye; their shirt is caked with blood.
Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 minute ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Ukrainian man arrested over 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions - Coast Reporter

1 Share

BERLIN (AP) — A Ukrainian man wanted in Germany in connection with the 2022 undersea explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines was arrested on a European warrant in Croatia on Wednesday, Germany’s federal prosecutor said.

BERLIN (AP) — A Ukrainian man wanted in Germany in connection with the 2022 undersea explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines was arrested on a European warrant in Croatia on Wednesday, Germany’s federal prosecutor said.

The German prosecutors said that the suspect was a “trained scuba diver” who belonged to a group of people who “planted explosives” on the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea near the Danish island of Bornholm.

The undersea explosions on Sept. 26, 2022, damaged the pipelines, which had been built to carry Russian natural gas to Germany under the Baltic Sea. The damage added to tensions over the war in Ukraine as European countries moved to wean themselves off Russian energy sources after the Kremlin’s full-scale invasion of its neighbor.

The suspect was “strongly suspected of jointly causing explosions, anti-constitutional sabotage, and destruction of buildings and structures," the prosecutors' statement said. It said he was arrested in the Croatian seaside city of Pula and would be brought before an investigating judge at Germany’s federal court of justice after his extradition.

The German prosecutor's office identified the suspect only as Vladimir Z. in its statement announcing his arrest. A spokesperson, however, confirmed to The Associated Press that it was the same man who was arrested in Poland last year but was later released when a Polish court refused to extradite him to Germany. Polish authorities identified him as Volodymyr Zhuravlov.

Poland has long opposed the Nord Stream pipelines, viewing them as an attempt by Russia to use its vast energy resources to gain leverage across Europe. Prime Minister Donald Tusk said at the time of Zhuravlov's extradition hearing that it would not be in Poland’s interest to hand him over.

It was not immediately clear why Zhuravlov left Poland given the arrest warrant that was out for him.

“Volodymyr knew that the ruling applies only on the territory of Poland,” his Polish lawyer, Tymoteusz Paprocki, told the AP, adding that Zhuravlov's wife was also surprised that her husband was detained in Croatia.

The German government welcomed the arrest on Wednesday.

“We’re simply glad that the federal prosecutor’s office is making progress in these investigations, because it’s important that the bombing of the pipelines be clarified as well,” Justice Ministry spokesman Nicholas Limmer told reporters in Berlin.

Last month, German federal prosecutors filed charges against a former Ukrainian army officer in connection with the same explosions.

The suspect, identified only as Serhii K., faces charges of causing an explosion, damaging property, disrupting public service and being an “accomplice to war crimes” by attacking civilian objects.

Serhii K. was detained in August 2025 in an Italian village, where officers raided a bungalow where he was staying with his family. Police said he surrendered without resistance. He was extradited to Germany in November.

The suspects allegedly used a yacht that set off from the German port of Rostock. The yacht had been rented from a German company using forged IDs and intermediaries.

The explosions ruptured the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which was Russia’s main natural gas supply route to Germany until Moscow cut off supplies in August 2022. They also damaged Nord Stream 2, which never entered service because Germany suspended its certification process shortly before Russia’s invasion.

Initially some officials in the West suspected that Russia might have carried out the explosions. But German investigators later pointed to suspected Ukrainian involvement.

Russia has accused the U.S. of staging the explosions, a charge Washington has denied. The pipelines were long a target of criticism by the U.S. and some of its allies, which warned that they increased dependence on Russian gas.

___

Claudia Ciobanu in Warsaw, Poland, and Fanny Brodersen in Berlin contributed reporting.

Kirsten Grieshaber, The Associated Press

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

With 500-plus structures damaged or lost, B.C.'s fire season is among the worst - Coast Reporter

1 Share

The worst recent human toll was in 2023, when six firefighters were killed.

More than 500 homes or other structures have been destroyed or damaged by wildfires in British Columbia this year, in a level of devastation comparable to some of the worst recent fire seasons.

While the area of 4,300 square kilometres burned by the more than 1,000 fires so far this year has only been a fraction of the area burned in other years — such as 2023 when a record 29,000 square kilometres burned — the structural losses have been piling up.

By comparison, the B.C. government said about 600 structures were destroyed or damaged in 2023, including about 400 homes, many of them around Okanagan Lake, where losses have again been concentrated.

In 2017, 509 structures were destroyed, including 229 homes.

The worst recent human toll was in 2023, when six firefighters were killed. An 80-year-old-woman is the only known fatality this year. RCMP say she died suddenly while she was evacuating her home in Meadow Valley, west of Summerland, ahead of the Bald Range fire.

Here's how the 2026 destruction has been accumulating:

THE BALD RANGE FIRE

The Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen says the fire is still burning out of control west of Okanagan Lake and has destroyed or damaged about 150 properties; 40 in Summerland and more than 100 in other areas, including the community of Faulder, which has been largely razed.

THE BRADLEY COMPLEX

This group of fires at the northern end of Okanagan Lake near Vernon has been declared held. The chief of the Okanagan Indian Band says about 230 homes, including about 30 homes of band members and 200 non-band homes on its land, were destroyed by the Bradley Creek blaze when it swept through the area on Aug. 1.

THE BIG BAR COMPLEX

The Thompson-Nicola Regional District says structures have been destroyed on about 120 properties outside Clinton, with the massive 1,600-square-kilometre Pear Lake fire still burning out of control. The district estimates losses could total several hundred structures.

BRUNSWICK COMPLEX

The Fraser Valley Regional District says seven structures, including four homes or cabins and three other structures, were destroyed by the Brunswick complex of fires that threatened the community of Boston Bar. It continues to burn out of control, almost seven weeks after it was detected.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 18, 2026.

Canadian Press Staff, The Canadian Press

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

BC cutting public access to decades-old government directory - Coast Reporter

1 Share

The B.C. government is preparing to shut off public access to its online government directory, leaving taxpayers in the dark about who works for the province and the basic organizational structure of the government.

The move will end a service the government has provided for decades, based on what it says is the risk of cybersecurity attacks, combined with privacy concerns for the civil servants who have their names and contact information posted online.

“Effective August 20, 2026, public/non-(internal) users will no longer have access to the B.C. Government Directory and its employee directory information, organizational details, and directory search and browse functions,” reads an internal government service bulletin obtained by Business in Vancouver.

“Access to the B.C. Government Directory will be restricted to (internal) users only.”

“This enhancement will reduce the cybersecurity and privacy risks associated with exposing employee contact information publicly, while continuing to provide appropriate public access to government services.”

The government intends to redirect the public to a pre-existing “find government services” page instead, which provides direct links to information and forms.

The Ministry of Citizens’ Services declined to comment on the change.

The public has long had access to the directory of names, titles and contact information for public employees inside the government and the legislature. Before the internet, the province produced annual printed directories that date back as far as the 1930s, which are archived at the legislature library.

The rationale from previous governments has been that if you are paid with public money, you should be prepared to have the public able to contact you as part of basic transparency and accountability. That extends to budget documents, which publish annual lists of civil servant names and salaries.

The Opposition BC Conservatives had no comment on whether the NDP government was making the right decision and refused to make any MLAs available to speak on the subject.

Longtime Opposition finance critic Peter Milobar, now sitting as an independent MLA, blasted the NDP’s decision as part of a continued push to limit public records, charge onerous fees and exempt decision-makers from scrutiny.

“It’s laughable in the extreme they are trying to pin finding a contact email or phone number for somebody to cybersecurity,” Milobar said in an interview.

“The public has a right to understand [who] they are trying to connect with, certainly at the deputy minister and assistant deputy minister level—those people should be accessible, or at least known.

“This is just another level of secrecy this government seems to want to keep implementing.”

B.C. had slowly been making redactions to the online directory in recent years, including replacing some direct emails with generic addresses and in some cases removing phone numbers entirely.

Many government officials, including numerous deputy ministers, also choose to have public LinkedIn profiles that list more personal details about them than the government directory, including detailed employment histories.

Other governments are grappling with the issue of public directories.

The City of Vancouver shuttered its online staff directory in 2024, citing increased harassment against staff. However, the City of Toronto still publishes detailed lists of staff that work in each department, alongside phone numbers at which to reach them.

The federal government has a searchable online directory of public servants across Canada. The Ontario provincial government lists names, phone numbers and emails for provincial employees, alongside a detailed search function.

Independent MLA Elenore Sturko, a former RCMP officer, said the government does need to address the risk of cybersecurity attacks, such as the one the B.C. government faced from foreign actors in 2024.

“We do really need to protect public service employees from doxing or any other kind of attack or privacy breaches that would impact them negatively,” she said. “Because the reality is the way people choose to interact has changed.”

However, Sturko said eliminating the directory entirely also robs the public of being able to understand the structure of ministries, who leads them in important decision-making, and how many employees work there.

“This secretive government isn’t really telling us, they are just acting and leaving people to wonder why they are again closing down information that’s been publicly available for a long time,” said Sturko.

“If this is a righteous change, simply explain in more detail to the public about why.”

Rob Shaw has spent more than 18 years covering B.C. politics, now reporting for CHEK News and writing for BIV. He hosts the weekly show Political Capital and has a NEW daily podcast, Political Capital Daily.

[email protected]

New newsletter alert! Stay ahead of the curve in B.C. politics. Get expert political analysis delivered straight to your inbox, plus inside scoops and other stories from across the province. Sign up here for the Capital & Coast newsletter.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Why Aren’t We More Upset?

1 Share

Henry Abraham via Substack:

‘What remains a mystery to me, though, is why Americans aren’t angrier over Trump’s crimes and misdemeanors. Have we forgotten our values of honesty, compassion, and creativity? Hasn’t anyone noticed that a third of the White House has been demolished? For a ballroom-bunker? Is patriotism only for “suckers and losers”? Are we ready to throw in the towel defending the rights of women, immigrants, people of color, and gays? Have we forgotten that we are “created equal and endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights”? What’s wrong with this picture and how did it get that way?

In 1941 the jurist Ernst Fraenkel who had fled Nazi Germany wrote a seminal book, The Dual State, in which he described two forms of government that could exist side by side. The first he called “the prerogative state,” and the second, “the normative state.” The first was the government that did whatever it wanted. The second was bound by the rule of law. The first is Donald Trump ignoring the birthright decision of the Supreme Court, or ICE agent Jonathan Ross killing Renee Good in Minneapolis without accountability. The normative state does what the law directs. The prerogative state does what it wants.

Americans live in both states, but unless the prerogative one affects us, we go about our business living under the illusion that our state is entirely “normative.” The prerogative Trump incinerates 300 school children on the first day of the Iran war, and we go out that evening for ice cream. Our illusion of normality protects us from shame, guilt, and rage because Trump’s paranoia, sadism, and slipping cognition don’t affect us personally. It’s time to shatter that illusion…’



Read the whole story
sarcozona
16 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

‘Rules of Engagement’ (1998) – The Serrano Legacy #5 by Elizabeth Moon

1 Share

This story got darker and darker. Not a built-to-scare-as-entertainment dark. A dark that felt real and wrong. Taliban dark. IDF in Gaza dark. Elizabeth Moon brought her characters into conflict with a violent, self-righteous, misogynistic, male-supremacist military group for whom the murder, mutilation, enslavement and rape of women who live ‘ungodly lives’ was a holy mission. It didn’t make for easy reading, but it wasn’t exploitative either. 

What made this part of the book work was that the people, even the ‘warriors’ doing these terrible things, felt human and multidimensional and that the women who had been abducted refused to give up hope, despite the things done to them.

The book also dealt with the internal politics of the military, ranging from manipulation and corruption in pursuit of career goals through to organised treachery, in a way that felt realistic and delivered a fair amount of suspense.

I liked the passage when Esmay Suiza, currently in bad odour with the Fleet, is called home to succeed her recently deceased grandmother as the Landbride of her substantial estates. I loved the concept of the Landbride both for its links to the land and for the matriarchal model that it offered in contrast to the military patriarchy. It was refreshing to get planetside for a while, and the description of the ceremony that made Suiza a Landbride was beautiful. 

The ending was satisfying, and the many challenges ahead of the main characters left me eager for the next book.



Read the whole story
sarcozona
16 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories