plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20359 stories
·
20 followers

Carney reaches a 'landmark' tariff-quota deal with China on EVs, canola

1 Comment
The Liberal government has reached a deal with Beijing to allow tens of thousands of Chinese electric vehicles into the domestic market in exchange for dropping duties on canola products, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Friday.
Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 hours ago
reply
Fuck yeah. Now start a generational project to switch to buses, trains, cycling, and walking for almost all travel in Canada with industrial policy to support companies that make bikes, trains, and buses and their batteries and parts instead of American car compliant branch plants
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Judge upholds cat custody ruling, saying parenthood and pet ownership are different

1 Comment
An Alberta judge has divided up a group of cats between two feuding former spouses, saying neither gets to keep all of them because — in Alberta at least — pets aren’t the same as kids and legally shouldn’t be treated as such.
Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 hours ago
reply
Correct
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Immigrants are more likely to cite human rights, diversity as 'Canadian values': survey

1 Share
Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Underfunding threatens Canada’s wildlife disease response | The Narwhal

1 Share

The head of a national network that tracks the spread of wildlife diseases says a persistent funding shortfall is undermining Canada’s ability to detect and respond to emerging threats to biodiversity, agriculture and human health.

Damien Joly is the chief executive officer of the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, a network of Canada’s five veterinary schools and the B.C. government’s Animal Health Centre. The cooperative works with federal, provincial and territorial governments to monitor wildlife diseases across the country.

In an interview with The Narwhal, Joly said the organization is “cash strapped across the board.”

“We do not have the resources we need to effectively monitor these diseases,” he said.

That warning comes as Canada grapples with the spread of highly transmissible diseases, such as chronic wasting disease, a fatal infection that afflicts deer, moose, elk and other cervids. At the same time, avian influenza, which has caused huge die-offs of wild birds and triggered mass culls at hundreds of infected poultry farms across the country, continues to spread. Hundreds of dead wild birds found in southern Manitoba in recent months have been linked to bird flu, as have the deaths of wild birds in Ontario

Damien Joly, CEO of the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, stands in a grassy area at the edge of a forest.Damien Joly, the chief executive officer of the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, warns a lack of funding for wildlife disease monitoring is undermining Canada’s ability to detect and respond to emerging threats to biodiversity, agriculture and human health. Photo: Shane Gross / The Narwhal

In Atlantic Canada, Joly said the cooperative is scraping together whatever funding it can find to continue monitoring the spread of avian flu, keeping a particular eye out for mutations in the virus.

“We’re seeing massive die-offs in Europe and it’s not going to be long before that particular strain finds its way over the Atlantic into Canada,” Joly said. 

Environment and Climate Change Canada is the cooperative’s primary funder, contributing almost $1.2 million in 2024-25. Funding from other federal agencies and departments, as well as provincial and territorial governments, brought the cooperative’s total budget to $3.5 million for that fiscal year, according to its annual report.

While Joly said the cooperative’s partners in government work hard to secure funding for wildlife disease monitoring, budget shortfalls remain a persistent problem.

“Every region is in a deficit situation,” Joly said. The result is the cooperative is being forced to dip into its rainy-day funds to cover costs.

Now he’s calling for federal, provincial and territorial governments to renew their commitment to implementing the Pan-Canadian Approach to Wildlife Health strategy, which most environment ministers endorsed in 2018 at an intergovernmental conference.

Joly estimates at least $10 million a year is needed to implement that strategy, half for the cooperative and the rest to be shared among provincial and territorial governments to strengthen wildlife disease monitoring and response.

At a minimum, Joly said more streamlined and consistent funding would give the cooperative and its staff more stability. Currently, he said, he’s managing reporting for more than 20 different funding pots for the cooperative’s national office alone.

In a statement to The Narwhal, Keean Nembhard, a press secretary for Julie Dabrusin, minister of environment, climate change and nature, said the federal government remains committed to conservation, addressing key threats to biodiversity and the principles of the Pan-Canadian Approach to Wildlife Health. But, he said, implementing that approach would require coordinated efforts and funding from federal, provincial and territorial governments.

Nembhard said Environment and Climate Change Canada has committed to providing the cooperative almost $360,000 in core funding for another two fiscal years to support monitoring and diagnostics of wildlife pathogens. But that’s only a fraction of the funding the cooperative needs, meaning the organization is still being left to juggle a piecemeal funding model.

For three decades, the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative has been tracking the causes of death for wild animals assessed by the network’s pathologists. That record gives researchers a clear picture of the pathogens and diseases that spread among wildlife and how deadly they usually are.

Having a baseline is crucial for being able to detect and respond to emerging threats to biodiversity quickly, Joly said. 

Laboratory staff work to dissect deer heads, collected in plastic tubs, to test for chronic wasting disease at a wildlife health lab in Dauphin, ManitobaFor decades Manitoba has collected, dissected and tested thousands of deer, moose and elk heads as part of its program to monitor and contain chronic wasting disease. Photo: Mikaela MacKenzie / Winnipeg Free Press

Take chronic wasting disease, which was first detected in Canada on a Saskatchewan elk farm in 1996. Since then, the disease has spread through wild populations of deer, elk and other cervids. With cases now being detected in British Columbia, Joly said the risks to caribou are particularly scary.

“This is a species that’s in trouble already,” he said. 

Researchers knew the disease was a looming threat for B.C. long before the first case was detected in the province in 2024, according to Kaylee Byers, an assistant professor in the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia.

As monitoring showed the disease had spread to Alberta and neighbouring regions in the United States, the risk that it would move into B.C. grew.

Knowing where and how a disease is spreading can give governments and researchers a chance to target their response, Byers said. That could mean, for instance, increasing sample collection and testing in high-risk areas or putting in place new protocols for transporting animal parts. 

Byers, who is also the deputy director of the B.C. arm of the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, said wildlife disease monitoring today largely relies on the public to report sick, injured or dead animals. 

“What’s really challenging about that, is it’s not the full picture,” she said, adding that more funding could allow for expanded monitoring.

“Take something like avian influenza,” she said. Wild birds land in plenty of remote wetlands where there’s potential for the virus to spill over into other animal populations. But, if people aren’t frequenting these areas, that spread might not be captured by current monitoring programs, she warned. 

Understanding the pathogens and diseases spreading among wildlife is important for people as well. These diseases can threaten the wildlife populations hunters rely on for food. They can pass to and spread rapidly among livestock, putting animal welfare in jeopardy and farmers’ livelihoods at risk. And they can threaten our own human health.

Many of the diseases that affect people today are zoonotic, meaning they’re caused by germs that can spread between animals and people. 

a photo of a steel gate at a farm with a stop sign and a yellow sign that says no entry, strict bio-security in effectPoultry farms in the Fraser Valley region east of Vancouver, B.C., adopted strict measures to defend their flocks against bird flu infections, as the virus wreaked havoc across the country and around the world in recent years. Photo: Darryl Dyck / The Canadian Press

Scientists have worried for years about the potential for bird flu to cause a human pandemic. While it has wreaked havoc around the world in recent years, it hasn’t caused widespread disease in people so far. There have been dozens of human cases in the U.S. since 2024, mostly among workers exposed to the virus at infected poultry and dairy operations. In Canada, a teenager was infected with a severe case of the virus in late 2024. Advanced testing showed the closest match for the virus she contracted was found in wild birds in the Fraser Valley. The teen spent almost two months in hospital before she was released. 

Though human cases remain rare, bird flu has taken a significant toll on poultry farmers across the country. Since 2021, there have been outbreaks at 591 poultry farms in Canada. Millions of farmed birds have been culled as a result.

As a member of the World Organisation for Animal Health, Canada is obligated to monitor and report on certain diseases, including avian flu, that spread not just among livestock but also wildlife.

“Identifying disease risks in wildlife early ensures timely intervention strategies, reduces the risk of disease spread to other animals or people (so-called spillovers) and reduces the impacts on wildlife themselves and on biodiversity and ecosystems,” Claire Cayol, the organization’s project manager for wildlife health information systems, said in a statement to The Narwhal.

Founded in 1924, the international organization sets standards related to animal health, including for surveillance of certain wildlife diseases, that allow for global trade of animals and animal products.

What that means, Joly said, is the work the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative does is also vital to Canada’s ability to trade beef, poultry and other food products. 

Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Editorial: What doomed drug decriminalization in B.C.

1 Share
Read: 3 min

B.C. announced this week that it is ending the province’s three-year experiment with drug decriminalization. 

“The intention was clear: to make it easier for people struggling with addiction to reach out for help without fear of being criminalized,” B.C. Health Minister Josie Osborne said in a statement.

“Despite the hard work and good intentions behind the pilot, it has not delivered the results we hoped for.”

Quelle surprise.

If you look at what decriminalization can and should look like, it is easy to understand why B.C.’s experiment failed. Portugal, a country that today loses fewer than 100 individuals a year to overdoses, shows what is possible with a holistic approach to decriminalization. 

B.C. drew from Portugal’s experience in designing its own decriminalization pilot, which allowed residents to possess opioids, cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA for personal use beginning in January 2023.

But B.C. only borrowed Portugal’s language of decriminalization, without creating the whole infrastructure needed to make it effective. 

Our must-read series on Portugal’s decriminalization system, launched this week, provides a full picture of the differences between their system and ours. 

At the top of the list is Portugal’s Dissuasion Commissions, administrative bodies that assess a person’s risk of problematic drug use, offer counselling and connect users to treatment.

In Portugal, police are required to send individuals found in possession of drugs — from cannabis to heroin — to these commissions. 

The commissions take a holistic approach to drug use, assessing individuals for common underlying drivers of addiction, including lack of housing and unemployment. Individuals are then connected to resources tailored to their specific needs.

High-risk drug users are encouraged to enter treatment, which is voluntary, long term, and publicly funded for those who need it. If there is a wait to access treatment, Portugal ensures individuals are supported during that wait. 

Could the Canadian experience be any more different? 

In B.C., decriminalization neutered police. After the province’s pilot began, B.C. police had no lawful authority to prohibit public drug possession unless someone was engaged in other unlawful activities, Chief Constable Fiona Wilson of the Victoria Police Service recently told Canadian Affairs.

Meanwhile, the province did not substantially increase access to addiction treatment or resources that would help individuals address key drivers of addiction, such as mental health challenges, lack of housing or unemployment. 

And to state the obvious, B.C. — and Canada at large — has not created anything like Portugal’s Dissuasion Commissions. The reason for this, we’d argue, goes far beyond bureaucratic constraints or budget limitations.

Fundamentally, Portugal has taken a paternalistic stance on drug use. The country seeks to discourage a behaviour that it rightly recognizes as problematic. 

Canada, meanwhile, has gone the other direction. We have normalized and destigmatized drug use while allowing programs such as safer supply and safe consumption to be our primary response to a crisis that requires a systemic overhaul. 

There are legitimate origins to Canada’s turn toward normalization. Our country was one of many that recognized problematic drug use is a health issue, and that criminal law can be a poor tool for countering it. We also acknowledged that the law can be discriminatorily applied, resulting in the unfair targeting of certain racial or socioeconomic groups. 

Decriminalization rightly sought to end these harms.

But we didn’t stop there. Our cultural norms shifted. In Canada, we have become uncomfortable with saying there are behaviours we do not condone; that drug use is bad for individuals, their families and society at large, even if that is what the evidence tells us. 

If Canada wants to reduce our overdose rate from 6,000 a year to fewer than 100, it will require radical changes of the kind few politicians have floated. It will entail changing not merely our laws, social investments and bureaucratic architecture, but also our culture. 

We will need authorities and the public to discourage drug use. Encouragingly, Portugal has shown it is possible to be paternalistic without returning to the old days of criminalization and stigmatization. 

The question is: do Canadians want that? And if not now, how many lives will need to be lost before we do? 

The post Editorial: What doomed drug decriminalization in B.C. appeared first on Canadian Affairs.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

After the ceasefire

1 Share

Gaza entered 2026 under a fragile ceasefire, yet winter arrived as though nothing had changed. Flooded streets, tents that offer no protection from the cold, and long nights without electricity revealed a reality many prefer to ignore: in Gaza, winter is not merely a natural season or a climate-related disaster, but a condition politically produced and managed through ongoing siege and restrictions. And although the bombardment has not stopped, the conditions of life have remained the same, as if the war has not ended but has simply changed its form.

The widespread assumption after the ceasefire was that conditions in Gaza would automatically improve. But the question that imposes itself today is: what has actually changed? Border crossings remain restricted, construction materials are scarce, electricity is cut off, and even humanitarian aid and tents have become subject to decisions that obstruct its delivery and continuity. As a result, this winter has been harsh not only because of the weather, but because ongoing restrictions have turned cold and rain into additional tools of pressure on a population already living under exceptional conditions.

Fading international attention

Winter in Gaza is not a fleeting seasonal event; it is a direct extension of the siege. The unsafe, worn-out tents sheltering thousands of families are not the result of sudden poverty, but of the deliberate prevention of reconstruction or even temporary alternatives. The cold becomes deadlier when people are deprived of electricity and heating, and when the most basic necessities of life are reduced to near-impossible privileges.

What makes this reality even more dangerous is its timing. After the announcement of a ‘paper’ ceasefire in October 2025, the world began to treat Gaza as though it had emerged from war or was on a path toward recovery. Yet despite ongoing bombardment and daily targeting, international attention continues to fade, and with it the political pressure needed to force any lasting change, while life itself remains besieged and unstable.

As international attention fades and promises remain on paper, the people living here are left to judge not the authorities or committees, but the reality in front of them.

For people living in Gaza, the question of who Trump and his government will decide will govern, has become almost irrelevant. What matters most is not the names of committees or officials, but whether anyone in power can provide the rights that people deserve: electricity that works, safe shelters, access to food, water, and medicine. After years of war and siege, survival has overtaken politics, and hope now depends on tangible actions rather than promises on paper.

As humanitarian work is increasingly criminalized and organizations are accused of unsubstantiated affiliations, the last mechanisms of protection and documentation are stripped away.

The restriction of 37 international humanitarian organizations in Gaza, understood not as distant institutions but as vital survival networks, has a direct impact on people’s lives. These organizations include teams distributing food, clinics treating the wounded, and programs providing minimal access to clean water and essential services in a place where access to basic resources has become the exception rather than the rule. Removing them from Gaza’s already fragile landscape is not a neutral step; it is a political decision that translates directly into a matter of life or death. Years of siege, genocide, and the destruction of infrastructure have left Gaza unable to sustain itself: hospitals operate with severely limited capacity, safe water remains scarce, and entire residential neighbourhoods lie in ruins. Under these conditions, restricting humanitarian work means depriving millions of civilians of their most basic rights.

This reality intersects with the repeated discourse around the ‘entry of aid’ through border crossings, particularly Rafah, often presented as evidence of improvement after the ceasefire. Yet opening the crossing intermittently, or allowing a limited number of trucks to enter, cannot compensate for the absence of a humanitarian system capable of operating and sustaining itself. As humanitarian work is increasingly criminalized and organizations are accused of unsubstantiated affiliations, the last mechanisms of protection and documentation are stripped away. Gaza is further isolated, even at the very moment it is supposedly entering a post, ceasefire phase.

Clear political action

In this third consecutive winter, harshness is no longer an abstract description, but a lived reality experienced day by day across the Gaza Strip. In the camp where I live, just 17 minutes of rain were enough to flood it entirely. In that short time, water poured into the tents, and people lost most of the few belongings that had survived displacement with them. What we hear daily is no longer weather forecasts, but warnings of an approaching low-pressure system, and fear of a night in which the tents may not withstand the wind. And as we try to protect what little remains, the daily winds and storms do not stop at damaging tents; they have also caused parts of inhabited buildings to collapse, reminding everyone how fragile life here is, where a single storm can turn shelter itself into a danger.

Gaza demonstrates, day after day, that rights taken for granted in many parts of the world, such as safe housing, basic services, and freedom of movement, remain almost unattainable here. Yet people’s lives are not defined by passive waiting or helplessness, but by ongoing efforts to adapt and preserve hope. Observing this reality reveals not only the human cost of the siege, but also the forms of resistance that emerge when all other options are closed off.

However, turning this resilience into a feel-good story of inspiration carries its own danger. Admiration for people’s ability to endure must not become a justification for the conditions that force them to endure in the first place. Everyday resistance is not a substitute for rights, nor should it be used to normalize suffering or accept it as an inevitable reality.

What Gaza’s winter of 2026 exposes is this: if life remains this harsh after a ‘ceasefire on paper,’ what does the promoted notion of ‘improvement’ actually mean? And if the basic restrictions are still in place, why has international attention waned? Should the suffering of civilians be allowed to fade from view simply because mass killing is no longer dominating headlines?

The siege must be lifted to allow real reconstruction of homes, schools, and basic infrastructure, and to give people the chance to rebuild their lives through work and education.

What people in Gaza need is not seasonal sympathy, but clear and urgent political action. In the short term, border crossings must be kept open to allow fuel, food, medicine, and winter supplies to enter without restrictions. Fuel is essential to keep hospitals operating, water systems running, and families warm during winter.

There is also an urgent need to replace unsafe tents with proper emergency shelter, such as caravans and insulated temporary housing that can protect people from rain, wind, and cold. Emergency winter support should focus on children, the elderly, and the sick, while civilian shelters and infrastructure must be protected from further damage.

In the long term, preventing another winter of crisis requires more than humanitarian aid. The siege must be lifted to allow real reconstruction of homes, schools, and basic infrastructure, and to give people the chance to rebuild their lives through work and education. This must be matched with sustained political pressure and accountability to prevent the repeated destruction of Gaza.

Without these changes, each new year in Gaza will remain just a number, and every winter another season of forced survival.

In Gaza, winter is measured not only in degrees of cold, but in the capacity to endure. And while people continue to persevere, the persistence of these conditions tests not only their ability to resist, but the credibility of the entire international system and the moral bankruptcy of the world. For when winter is politically managed, it is no longer a matter of weather, it is a matter of life.



Read the whole story
sarcozona
2 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories