plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
19730 stories
·
21 followers

NHS facing ‘absolutely shocking’ £27bn bill for maternity failings in England | NHS | The Guardian

1 Share

The NHS is facing an “absolutely shocking” £27bn bill for maternity failings in England, the Guardian can reveal, after a series of hospital scandals triggered a record level of legal claims.

Hundreds of babies and women have died or suffered life-altering conditions as a result of botched care in NHS trusts across the country in recent years, prompting the government to launch a “rapid” national inquiry.

Analysis of NHS figures shows the potential bill for maternity negligence in England since 2019 has reached £27.4bn – far more than the health service’s roughly £18bn budget for newborns in that time.

The number of families taking legal action against the NHS for obstetrics errors rose to a record of nearly 1,400 a year in 2023, double the number in 2007, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act.

Labour MP Paulette Hamilton, the acting chair of the Commons health and social care select committee, said the figures were “absolutely shocking” and represented a “devastatingly high number of deaths and injuries of mothers and babies”.

She added: “The words ‘eye-watering’ come nowhere near to describing the enormous financial cost of these cases to the NHS, arising from failings within its own provision of care.”

An NHS source said about half of the 1,400 claims a year may not result in compensation payouts, so the amount paid out would be lower. However, compensation only accounts for part of the total 27bn figure, a larger share being legal costs. In the past six years, the NHS has spent £24.6m on legal fees for claims that did not result in damages.

NHS Resolution, the organisation that handles negligence claims for the NHS trusts in England, recorded in its most recent annual report, published on Thursday, that the cost of settling all maternity-related claims was £37.5bn. This amounts to nearly two-thirds of its total £60bn clinical negligence liabilities bill, a sum described by senior MPs as “jaw-dropping”.

Jeremy Hunt, the former Conservative health secretary, said: “It should be a matter of national shame that we now spend more on maternity litigation than the total cost of running maternity services.”

Hunt said the NHS was still not doing enough to learn from mistakes and the biggest problem was that clinicians fear being sacked for admitting errors.

Jess Brown-Fuller, the Liberal Democrat hospitals spokesperson, accused the Conservatives of a “scandalous” neglect of maternity services.

She added: “The crisis in our maternity services is being laid bare through the trauma that so many families have to deal with. Now these figures are showing just how much damage it is causing to our health service.”

The £27.4bn figure is the estimated value of maternity claims arising out of incidents since April 2019. NHS Resolution said the figure could change as there is an average three-year gap between an incident and a legal claim, the most serious birth injuries resulting in payments made over several years – and sometimes for the duration of the child’s life.

The figures have been revealed amid growing alarm about the state of maternity care in NHS hospitals across England. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, last month ordered a national investigation into “failing” services for women and babies, following a series of scandals in Shrewsbury and Telford, Nottingham, Barrow-in-Furness, Leeds and elsewhere.

Inspections of 131 NHS maternity units across England classed as many as two-thirds as “inadequate” or “requires improvement” for safety between 2022 and 2024.

The Care Quality Commission, the healthcare regulator, said issues including staff shortages were “systemic” and “widespread”, with almost half of the 131 maternity units it reviewed performing below standard.

Hamilton said the state of maternity care in the UK was “completely unacceptable”.

Previously unreported FoI figures show the NHS paid out £134m in the nine years to March 2023 to the families of nearly 300 women and about 400 babies who died in NHS settings.

However, the biggest settlements were for clinical errors that resulted in severe long-term disabilities, for which the NHS is liable for the lifetime costs of the child’s care.

As much as £1.7bn was paid out over failures to respond to abnormal foetal heart rates and £1.55bn for failing to properly monitor second-stage labour between 2006 and 2024. A further £247m was paid out over birth defects owing to clinical negligence.

Natalie Richardson, a medical negligence solicitor for Patient Claim Line, said there had been a 79% increase in the number of birth and pregnancy cases the firm had taken on this year.

Leeds teaching hospitals NHS trust, whose maternity units were last month downgraded to inadequate over safety concerns, paid out nearly £72m in compensation due to 107 obstetrics failings in the nine years to March 2024 – including 13 fatalities and 14 stillbirths.

In the same period, Nottingham University hospitals NHS trust was ordered to pay nearly £60m for 80 clinical damages claims related to pregnancies – including seven deaths.

That trust is at the centre of a vast criminal investigation into suspected corporate manslaughter over the severe harm of potentially more than 2,000 babies and women.

The Department of Health and Social Care said it had inherited “an unacceptable situation where too many families are suffering from botched care” and the NHS is “paying billions for its mistakes, rather than fixing them”.

It added: “We are committed to breaking that cycle and providing mothers and babies with safe, compassionate care once and for all.”

NHS England said it was taking immediate steps to strengthen maternity services, including closer oversight of underperforming trusts. It added: “We recognise that too many women and families are not receiving the high-quality maternity care they deserve, and we are committed to changing this.”

NHS Resolution said: “The high cost of compensation arising in maternity comes from a small number of very serious incidents resulting in brain injury to a baby at birth. These incidents are devastating for families and reflect the need to make provision for lifelong and complex care needs.”

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Top central banker defends climate work after US pushback

1 Comment
JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
6 hours ago
reply
“A senior central banker has defended supervisors’ work on climate change after attacks from the US, and warned officials had previously “completely underestimated” the risks rising temperatures pose to the financial system.”
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Assessing healthy vaccinee effect in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies: a national cohort study in Qatar

1 Comment
Read the whole story
sarcozona
9 hours ago
reply
damn, i was hoping hve was overstated. the opposite is true
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

ICE Is Planning Mass Extraordinary Renditions

2 Shares
Read the whole story
rocketo
10 hours ago
reply
seattle, wa
sarcozona
15 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

SpaceX worker injury rates at Starbase outpace industry rivals | TechCrunch

1 Share

SpaceX employees are more likely to be injured while working at Starbase than any of its other manufacturing facilities, according to company worker safety records reviewed by TechCrunch.

Starbase, a sprawling launch-and-manufacturing site that recently incorporated as its own Texas city, logged injury rates that were almost 6x higher than the average for comparable space vehicle-manufacturing outfits and nearly 3x higher than aerospace manufacturing as a whole in 2024, according to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) data released in May. That outsized injury rate has persisted since 2019, when SpaceX began sharing Starbase injury data with the federal regulator. 

Starbase is home to SpaceX’s most ambitious program: a fully reusable, ultra-heavy-lift rocket called Starship. The company has been moving at a breakneck pace to bring Starship online to launch Starlink internet satellites and other payloads. 

Since Starship’s first orbital test in April 2023, SpaceX has attempted eight additional integrated flights. During three of those tests, the company made history by catching the massive Super Heavy booster with “chopstick” arms attached to the launch tower. 

The data suggests that SpaceX’s rapid progress comes at a cost. And while injury rates alone don’t provide a complete picture of the safety culture at Starbase, they do offer a rare glimpse into the working conditions of the world’s leading space company. 

OSHA uses a standardized safety metric called Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) to measure a company’s safety record and compare it to industry peers, like Blue Origin and United Launch Alliance. The publicly available data has limitations. It doesn’t distinguish between minor injuries like stitches versus serious incidents such as amputations. 

TechCrunch calculated the TRIR based on that data, which includes the total number of incidents and total number of hours worked by SpaceX employees at each site. 

Techcrunch event

San Francisco | October 27-29, 2025

Starbase, which plays a central role in SpaceX CEO Elon Musk’s mission to make life multi-planetary, is an outlier in the company and across the industry as a whole. Its TRIR topped out at 4.27 injuries per 100 workers in 2024, when it employed an average of 2,690 workers, according to the data submitted to OSHA. Injured Starbase employees were unable to perform their normal job duties for a total of 3,558 restricted-duty days, plus 656 lost-time days where injuries made them unable to work at all. 

Starbase is classified by the U.S. government as a space vehicle-manufacturing operation. The injury rate in this sector has fallen dramatically since 1994, dropping from 4.2 injuries per 100 workers to 0.7 injuries per 100 workers in 2023, according to historical data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. (BLS calculates these rates through its annual company surveys, which asks for the same information found in OSHA’s worker injury forms.) But despite major changes in safety processes across the industry, Starbase is closer to the rates of 30 years ago. 

The injury rate across all of SpaceX’s manufacturing facilities — which includes an engine development and testing site in McGregor, Texas; a Starlink satellite-manufacturing complex in Bastrop, Texas; the Falcon rocket complex in Hawthorne, California; and another satellite-manufacturing site in Redmond, Washington — is 2.28. 

These other facilities report lower TRIR rates, though most still exceed the industry averages. For instance, 2024 data shows TRIR rates of 2.48 at McGregor, 3.49 at Bastrop, 1.43 at Hawthorne, 2.89 at Redmond. The 2024 TRIR for aerospace manufacturing as a whole is 1.6. 

SpaceX also operates several non-manufacturing sites, including barge operations off both coasts; offices in Sunnyvale, California; and launch sites at Cape Canaveral and Vandenberg Space Force Base. 

Former OSHA chief of staff Debbie Berkowitz told TechCrunch via email that Starbase’s TRIR “is a red flag that there are serious safety issues that need to be addressed.” 

However, there is a debate among safety professionals about whether TRIR is the most reliable metric for assessing and predicting injury rates, particularly serious incidents like fatalities, and especially for small companies. A recent paper on TRIR questioned its statistical validity and advocated that organizations use alternative measures of safety performance instead. 

Of the 14 OSHA inspections at SpaceX facilities over the past four years, six involved accidents and injuries at Starbase. That includes a partial finger amputation in 2021 and a crane collapse in June 2025. The latter inspection is still ongoing. Investigations by other news outlets, including Reuters, have uncovered hundreds of previously unreported worker injuries, including crushed limbs and one fatality. 

The 2024 injury rate at Starbase marks an improvement to that of the prior year, which topped out at 5.9 injuries per 100 workers in 2023 and 4.8 injuries in 2022. But it still leads among SpaceX’s land-based facilities and is second overall only to its West Coast booster recovery operations, which has a TRIR of 7.6. 

OSHA confirmed TechCrunch’s calculation of Starbase’s TRIR over email, but otherwise did not respond to questions regarding that location’s injury rate. SpaceX did not respond to request for comment.   

NASA has a major stake in Starship’s development. The agency is counting on using the rocket to return humans to the moon before the end of this decade, and it is paying more than $4 billion to SpaceX for two crewed Starship flights to the lunar surface. 

Both the contract for the Starship lander and SpaceX’s contract for its Commercial Crew services to the International Space Station contain particular clauses that allow the agency to take action in the case of a major breach of safety, such as a fatality or a “willful” or “repeat” OSHA violation. 

While a persistently high TRIR rate can be evidence of a safety problem, it is not an automatic trigger for action and does not fall under the definition of a “major breach of safety” in their contracts. 

“NASA interacts frequently with its partners, including SpaceX, to ensure safety from a mission assurance perspective, and remains in regular contact with the company during normal contract administration,” a NASA spokesperson told TechCrunch in response to questions about the company’s TRIR. “Safety is paramount to NASA’s mission success. The agency continues to work with all our commercial partners to build and maintain a healthy safety culture.” 

Among rocket makers with vehicles in operation, Starbase still leads the pack: at ULA’s manufacturing facility in Decatur, Alabama, the TRIR is 1.12 injuries per 100 workers; at Blue Origin’s rocket park on the coast of Florida, the rate is 1.09.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
17 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Public Health is Dead | Podcast

1 Comment

Working against apathy and denial in public health can be exhausting when global leaders have washed their hands of responsibility for our collective health. If you are sick and tired of bad public health decisions, you’ll like Public Health is Dead.

Disease control data have quite literally been deleted, public health education is radio silent, and old pathogens are waking up with a vengeance.

Our quest on this show? Figure out how to make public health work for us, not against us.

New pandemics are breathing down our necks, driven by climate change and capitalism, and COVID is definitely not over. It might just be getting started with us. This airborne disease continues to leave a trail of damage, disability, and reinfection in its path.

We are far from ready for what the future holds.

On Public Health is Dead, undaunted public health advocates examine what’s not working in disease control, why it matters so much for you and the people you love, and, most importantly, what we can do about it to survive.

Public health is failing us. And you deserve to know.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
19 hours ago
reply
I wish this was text instead of a podcast but I’m glad it exists
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories