plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
20223 stories
·
20 followers

Nearly 25% of British Columbians used a food bank in 2025, report says

2 Shares
A report from Food Banks BC found that more people with full-time jobs continued to need support from the food bank.



Read the whole story
sarcozona
21 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
dreadhead
8 days ago
reply
Vancouver Island, Canada
Share this story
Delete

Glyphosate safety article retracted eight years after Monsanto ghostwriting revealed in court – Retraction Watch

1 Comment and 3 Shares
Credit: Mike Mozart/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

A review article concluding the weed killer Roundup “does not pose a health risk to humans” has been retracted eight years after documents released in a court case revealed employees of Monsanto, the company that developed the herbicide, wrote the article but were not named as coauthors. 

The safety of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is hotly debated and currently under review at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization, in 2015 declared glyphosate “possibly carcinogenic.” 

The now-retracted article appeared in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, an Elsevier title, in 2000. Gary Williams, then a pathologist at New York Medical College in Valhalla, Robert Kroes, a toxicologist at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, and Ian C. Munro, a toxicologist at Cantox Health Sciences International in Ontario, Canada, were listed as the authors. The paper has been cited 614 times, according to Clarivate’s Web of Science. 

Three papers about glyphosate on which Williams was an author received an expression of concern and lengthy corrections in 2018 because the authors didn’t fully disclose their ties to Monsanto or the company’s involvement in the articles. 

In 2017, internal Monsanto documents, including emails between employees discussing scientific publications on the safety of glyphosate, were released in the course of a lawsuit alleging exposure to glyphosate caused people to develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In one email, a Monsanto employee proposed “keeping the cost down” to produce a scientific paper with outside scientists “by us doing the writing and they would just edit & sign their names so to speak. Recall that is how we handled Williams Kroes & Munro, 2000.” (The email is on page 203 of the document linked here and above.)

Despite the revelation of corporate ghost-writing, the paper continued to be cited in research and policy documents without criticism, as well as in Wikipedia articles, according to scholars who analyzed its impact. The researchers, Alexander Kaurov of Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, and Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., published their findings in September in another Elsevier journal, Environmental Science & Policy. They also wrote to the editors of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology to formally request the paper’s retraction, they wrote in editorials describing their work in Science and Undark

Their request “was actually the first time a complaint came to my desk directly,” Martin van den Berg, a co-editor-in-chief of the journal, told Retraction Watch. The article was published long before he took over, said van den Berg, a toxicologist at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, and “it was simply not brought to my attention” until Kaurov and Oreskes’ article. The retraction “could have been done as early as 2017, but it is clearly a case of two parallel information streams not connecting earlier,” he said. 

Kaurov and Oreskes wrote to the editors on July 25, Kaurov told us. The editors’ reaction “was exemplary and professional,” Kaurov said. They replied promptly, he said, and conducted their investigation in one month, which he considered “a reasonable amount of time.” 

The notice, which is more than 1,000 words long, appeared online in November. In it, van den Berg detailed “several critical issues that are considered to undermine the academic integrity of this article and its conclusions.” Most concerns were related to what van den Berg described as “the apparent contributions of Monsanto employees as co-writers to this article” without acknowledgment as coauthors. He also called out the authors’ reliance on unpublished studies from Monsanto for their conclusions that glyphosate exposure did not cause cancer, though other studies existed.

“The concerns specified here necessitate this retraction to preserve the scientific integrity of the journal,” van den Berg wrote. 

Van den Berg reached out to Williams, the sole surviving author, but did not receive a response, according to the notice. Williams, now an emeritus professor at New York Medical College, did not respond to our request for comment. An institutional investigation found “no evidence” Williams violated a policy against authoring a ghostwritten paper, the college told Science magazine in 2017. Kroes died in 2006 and Munro in 2011. 

A spokesperson for Bayer, which bought Monsanto, provided a statement which said the company “believe[s] Monsanto’s involvement was appropriately cited in the acknowledgments, which clearly states: ‘we thank the toxicologists and other scientists at Monsanto who made significant contributions to the development of exposure assessments and through many other discussions,’ and further identifies several ‘key personnel at Monsanto who provided scientific support.’”

“The consensus among regulatory bodies worldwide that have conducted their own independent assessments based on the weight of evidence is that glyphosate can be used safely as directed and is not carcinogenic,” said the company’s statement. 

The ghostwritten paper was among the 0.1 percent of most cited articles on glyphosate, Kaurov and Oreskes found in their analysis. Retracting the article “would not erase twenty-five years of influence,” they concluded, “but it would send a clear, overdue message that fraudulent authorship is unacceptable and that the scholarly record will be protected—no matter how old, how cited or how profitable the journal.”

Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on X or Bluesky, like us on Facebook, follow us on LinkedIn, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at [email protected].

Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.
Read the whole story
sarcozona
28 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
acdha
6 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
freeAgent
4 days ago
reply
When is Trump going to suggest that injecting glyphosate might help cure COVID?
Los Angeles, CA

Montgomery County rejects sidewalks because of “stranger danger”

2 Shares

In anticipation of the Purple Line’s scheduled opening in 2027, Montgomery County officials are looking at places to build sidewalks near the light rail line. But plans to build sidewalks near the future Takoma-Langley station, on University Boulevard in Takoma Park, have been shelved in part because neighbors say they’re afraid of “stranger danger.”

Staff at the Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) identified eight residential streets within a half-mile of the station that were missing sidewalks, then sent information about the proposal to over 150 nearby households. Fewer than half replied, but those who did were mostly against it. According to the letter from Robert Gonzales, Sidewalk Section Chief, of the 73 residents who responded, just 12 supported the sidewalks.

“In the remaining 61 comments, residents heavily opposed the installations,” Gonzales wrote, “expressing concerns about loss of available parking, lack of need, financial loss due to tree and landscaping removals, loss of environmental beauty and the ‘natural feel’ of the community, stranger danger, increased crime, littering, and, most of all, the worsening of stormwater flooding and erosion.”

Gonzales added that the county’s budget doesn’t have enough money to install the sidewalks anyway. “Our decision is clear,” he concluded. “None of the proposed sidewalks will be installed.”

“Stranger danger” is a concept dating to the 1960s, when high-profile cases of children being abducted or murdered began appearing in the news. If you grew up in the 1990s like me, you probably remember pictures of missing kids on milk cartons or round-the-clock news coverage about child kidnappings.

It’s largely unfounded, as children are most likely to get abducted by someone they know. But “stranger danger” was still an effective tool to scapegoat minority groups, like gay people, as threats to children. It became an excuse for “tough on crime” policies like mass incarceration. Sometimes it even backfired, leading children who are actually in danger to reject an unfamiliar adult trying to help. Today, child safety advocates strongly discourage teaching kids about “stranger danger.”

What does that have to do with sidewalks? I don’t know. But it seems any opposition, regardless of the reason, is enough not to build a sidewalk.

It’s generally MCDOT policy to get resident approval for the smallest of transportation projects. As with many things, the people who want sidewalks are less likely to speak up than people who are motivated by opposition, and people who don’t want sidewalks in front of their house can be pretty loud. Thus, the agency tends to defer to them.

In a now-deleted Bluesky post, an agency staffer said they asked residents in Bethesda’s Kenwood neighborhood, where thousands of people go to see cherry blossoms each spring, about building sidewalks. MCDOT decided not to after 50 households–a majority of those who replied, but just 20% of the whole neighborhood–were opposed.

Screenshot of a deleted post from MCDOT’s Bluesky page.

Even in neighborhoods where there’s vocal support for pedestrian improvements, MCDOT is slow to act. The agency rejected a Rockville neighborhood’s request for a stop sign near Wood Middle School after a driver hit one child, and only relented after another child was killed by a school bus. Here in East Silver Spring, my neighbors and I are pushing for stop signs at two intersections where drivers hit me and my dog and an 11-year-old boy this year. Bethesda Today recently covered that effort and was told by Michael Paylor, who’s in charge of traffic engineering and operations at MCDOT, that “sometimes it’s the best interest of the county to do nothing.”

Montgomery County boasts that it’s one of the first places in the United States to adopt Vision Zero, pledging to end all traffic fatalities by 2030. But between January and October 2025, 358 pedestrians were involved in a crash, 12 of whom died. That’s basically the same as four years ago. Giving people more safe places to walk by building more sidewalks, especially near a transit station that many people will walk to, would go a long way in reversing this trend. If this county were serious about safety, it wouldn’t use “stranger danger” as a reason not to build sidewalks.

The Department of Transportation is overseen by County Executive Marc Elrich, who is term-limited and is instead running for County Council. Next year’s Democratic primary on June 23, 2026 will likely decide his successor, who will be responsible for the agency. We’ll be endorsing in the executive and county council races, and asking the candidates if they support building more sidewalks–or making more excuses.

Top image: A sidewalk. Image by the author.

Comment on this article

Read the whole story
sarcozona
32 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
acdha
5 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

FDA withdraws requirements to check for asbestos in makeup - WTOP News

2 Comments

What do dry shampoo, baby powder and eyeshadow have in common? They all share one main ingredient that absorbs moisture and creates a smooth, powdery finish. But, that same ingredient could also contain cancer-causing asbestos.

Now, a federal rule that would have required cosmetic companies to test talc-based makeup products for asbestos contamination has been withdrawn under an order signed by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a move doctors say shifts the burden of safety back onto consumers.

Talc is a widely used mineral found in hygiene and beauty products, often occurring naturally together with asbestos, a known carcinogen.

“Asbestos can cause dangerous things like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer,” Dr. Katelin Mirkin, board-certified general and bariatric surgeon based out of St. Louis, Missouri, said.

Internal documents show cosmetic companies were aware of the risks as far back as the 1950s, although the public wasn’t broadly informed until the 1970s, she added. In fact, Johnson and Johnson didn’t discontinue talc in their popular baby powder formula until 2020, after facing billions of dollars in lawsuits.

The FDA eventually implemented routine testing requirements to prevent asbestos contamination. However, with the rule now withdrawn, “the onus is really becoming more on the consumer to protect themselves,” Mirkin said.

Mirkin said cosmetic talc itself is not considered dangerous unless it contains asbestos, and that most dangers come from inhalation.

“The best thing would be to go for a talc-free makeup product,” she said. “But I don’t think there’s any need for mass hysteria or throwing out all of your makeup. If you are worried about it, opt for talc-free products.”

Mirkin recommended consumers to be aware of symptoms, get age-appropriate medical screenings, and talk with their doctors about any “respiratory” concerns.

“There’s no need for mass hysteria, but this is more evidence that the consumer needs to be savvy and know that these companies aren’t necessarily looking out for us. We have to look out for ourselves,” she said.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
35 minutes ago
reply
Guess it’s time to stop buying makeup from America
Epiphyte City
acdha
5 days ago
reply
Narrator voice: it turns out they did in fact vote for this
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Torture Techniques from CIA Black Sites Were Used at Alligator Alcatraz

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Edited by Sam Thielman

ONE OF THE MOST horrific torture methods that the CIA employed in its post-9/11 incommunicado "black site" torture chambers was the Confinement Box. 

Not many detainees in CIA custody experienced the Box. The most prominent of them is the man known as Abu Zubaydah, the first CIA detainee post-9/11 and someone the agency used as a guinea pig for all who came into their custody later. What follows is not pleasant reading. 

For 20 days in August of 2002, after the Justice Department approved a proposed CIA menu of torture including something it called "cramped confinement," Abu Zubaydah was subjected to what the Senate intelligence committee's 2014 inquiry called "enhanced interrogation techniques on a near 24-hour-per-day basis." While the intensive waterboarding the CIA visited upon Abu Zubaydah has forevermore defined whatever passes for the popular understanding of his torture, the waterboarding was by no means the limit of what the CIA did to him.

On his first day of the August torture, after agency torturers slammed Abu Zubaydah's head against a concrete wall, they removed his hood "and had Abu Zubaydah watch while a large confinement box was brought into the cell and laid on the floor." A CIA cable records that they placed the box on the floor of the interrogation room "so as to appear [to be] a coffin." No one can misinterpret that message. But because the CIA was interested in driving the point home, its personnel at the Thailand black site known as Catseye or Detention Site Green "told Abu Zubaydah that the only way he would leave the facility was in the coffin-shaped confinement box."

A CIA medical officer—don't be fooled by the title into thinking they were there to help the detainees—cabled that Abu Zubaydah's liturgy of torture "progress[ed] quickly to the water board after large box, walling and small box periods." ("Walling" is using a rolled-up towel, positioned behind someone's neck and held on either side by someone in front of them, to slam someone's head into a wall.) The large box was the coffin. According to the Senate report, during those twenty days, "Abu Zubaydah spent a total of 266 hours (11 days, 2 hours) in the large (coffin size) confinement box and 29 hours in a small confinement box, which had a width of 21 inches, a depth of 2.5 feet, and a height of 2.5 feet."

Imagine being made to spend 11 days inside a coffin. Imagine being made to spend more than a day inside a box barely two feet large in any direction. Imagine having to curl up, unable to extend any of your extremities, in the claustrophobic conditions of such a box, for more than a cumulative day. You can see pictures Abu Zubaydah drew of himself in the small box. Now imagine this being done to someone you love.

I say all this because the following description appears in an Amnesty International report released Friday into the conditions of confinement for migrants at Alligator Alcatraz:

The four men interviewed by Amnesty International, as well as Florida-based organizations, told the organization about the ‘box’, described as a 2x2 foot cage-like structure located outside in the yard of “Alligator Alcatraz” where individuals are sent for punishment. Individuals are put in the ‘box’, their hands are shackled and their feet are attached to restraints on the ground. They are unable to sit down or move positions, and are forced to remain there for hours in the heat with hardly any water or protection from the sun, heat and insects. According to a man seeking safety, “People ended up in the ‘box’ just for asking the guards for anything. I saw a guy who was put in it for an entire day.”

A "2x2 cage-like structure… [an] extremely small space that prevents sitting, lying or changing position" has dimensions startlingly reminiscent of those the Senate documented in the black sites. The major difference is that in Florida, the Small Box is exposed to the elements and constructed as a barred cage, whereas in Catseye, it was a closed structure inside the larger closed structure of the black site. And in Florida, the box is used as punishment. According to one of the Alligator Alcatraz survivors in the Amnesty report, people were put into the box simply for alerting the guards to someone's need for medication. "They were taken to 'the box' and punished for trying to help me," the person told Amnesty.

The CIA also wanted to put insects inside the confinement box, as it happens. Ron DeSantis' people figured out how to do it.

There's a certain candor in not pretending that putting someone for hours on end into a cage where they cannot stand or lie down and can barely sit is an "intelligence-gathering" technique. By August 9, according to the Senate report, CIA personnel cabled to Langley that they did not believe Abu Zubaydah had "actionable new information" to provide. They kept torturing him for two more weeks anyway. In 2005, when the Justice Department reconvened to assess the future of the CIA torture program in an atmosphere of scrutiny that did not exist in 2002, Langley did not request continued use of the confinement boxes. 

Here we have Florida jailers using CIA-pedigreed torture techniques on migrants accused of being in the country without proper authorization, a civil, not criminal, violation. I have many questions about whose idea it was to import the confinement box to Alligator Alcatraz. But in the absence of answers to them at present, I submit to you that its appearance here, structurally speaking, is the direct result of there being no criminal or even substantial political penalties for the architects of the torture program, either at Langley or within the Bush administration. When there is no consequence for torture, torture will persist, going into abeyance—at most—until politically empowered sadists reach for a tool of domination. The lack of consequence ensures it is a matter of time before people who owe their positions of authority to declarations that they seek to dehumanize the vulnerable play a sick game of Well, if we did this to these Terrorists there, why not to these other Criminals here…

There is much else in the Amnesty report that should prompt not only a shutdown of this entire enterprise but an immediate criminal investigation. According to Amnesty, the unusual relationship between ICE and Florida leads to disappearances, since migrants held by ICE and transferred to Alligator Alcatraz no longer appear in ICE's databases. "They are also not registered in any public database where their families and lawyers can search for and confirm their whereabouts. This means that there is no official record of their detention and no way to track where they are being detained," Amnesty writes. 

"Organizations shared that no one knows how many people are actually currently detained at the facility," it continues. Let that sink in. No one knows how many people, let alone who, are at this moment locked inside a torture chamber. Unless the architects of Alligator Alcatraz are convicted at trial for torture—indisputably illegal by law enforcement on U.S. soil—this will happen again, except worse, and against expanding target cohorts. Ken Klippenstein's reporting is a blinking red arrow showing where it's going next.  

"EVERYTHING WE SAY, they can see." The end result of mass surveillance is mass murder. But before the path of total information capture reaches its logical end, how do people live through the experience of ubiquitous surveillance by a hostile power? Mohammed R. Mhawish details the social and psychological effects of what can only be described as persistent unfreedom inflicted on Palestinians by the State of Israel. He is 25 years old. "By the time I was in my teens," Mhawish writes, "we had learned which rooftops blinked red with antennas and which alleys were blind." During the genocide, people told Mhawish that they didn't only avoid the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s Squid Games for fear of being shot, but for fear of the foundation's cameras matching their faces to unknown databases. 

He lives through a bomb dropped on his three-story home after the Israelis threaten him, in text messages, for being a journalist. Rescue workers saved Mohammed, his wife Asmaa and their son Rafik. His lifetime under surveillance makes the strike on a home full of noncombatants feel even more personal. "Four people were killed: two cousins and two neighbors, one of whom happened to pass our door as the bomb fell."  

Mhawish explains: "This is the dystopian consequence of technology, supplied in part by American companies, being placed into the hands of authorities who have virtually unlimited control over a captive population they have openly villainized. It is the culmination of decades of monitored occupation, a totalitarian nightmare spliced with genocidal terror, a system that is already evolving and growing for whatever comes next."

You should not oppose this simply because it is coming, at some point in the future, for you. You should oppose this because it is happening to anyone. But it is coming for you. Palestine is a laboratory for the persistent unfreedom of the future.

PUT ON UGK'S “Quit Hatin’ the South” while you read Alain Stephens' excellent Intercept dispatch on Appalachian and Carolinian resistance to ICE and CBP

A UK SPECIAL FORCES whistleblower known as N1466 has told a British government inquiry that the head of the SAS (UK special forces) covered up the killing of civilians in Afghanistan discovered in 2011. The cover-up, which is alleged to include planting guns on dead civilians to make the kills appear righteous in after-action reports, enabled the slayings to persist through 2013. The timeline here is shortly after an infamous group of U.S. soldiers organized themselves into a death squad around Kandahar.

N1466 told the inquiry, "We didn’t join UKSF for this sort of behaviour—toddlers to get shot in their beds or random killing. It’s not special, it’s not elite, it’s not what we stand for and most of us, I don’t believe, would either wish to condone it or to cover it up." 

SOMEONE READING THIS KNOWS where to find the Seed demo from 1994 so Charlotte can listen to her mom's New Jersey hardcore band. This is the most heartwarming story I read last week. 

WALLER VS. WILDSTORM, the superhero spy thriller I co-wrote with my friend Evan Narcisse and which the masterful Jesús Merino illustrated, is available for purchase in a hardcover edition! If you don't have single issues of WVW and you want a four-issue set signed by me, they're going fast at Bulletproof Comics! Bulletproof is also selling signed copies of my IRON MAN run with Julius Ohta, so if you want those, buy them from Flatbush's finest! IRON MAN VOL. 1: THE STARK-ROXXON WAR, the first five issues, is now collected in trade paperback! Signed copies of that are at Bulletproof, too! And please pre-order IRON MAN VOL. 2: THE INSURGENT IRON MAN here!

No one is prouder of WVW than her older sibling, REIGN OF TERROR: HOW THE 9/11 ERA DESTABILIZED AMERICA AND PRODUCED TRUMP, which is available now in hardcover, softcover, audiobook and Kindle edition. And on the way is a new addition to the family: THE TORTURE AND DELIVERANCE OF MAJID KHAN.

Read the whole story
acdha
2 days ago
reply
Obama’s greatest failure was not prosecuting war crimes, emboldening a generation of torture-loving Republicans
Washington, DC
sarcozona
39 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Long Covid Disabling Continues

1 Share

One of the predictions I made many years ago was that Long Covid would slowly cripple workforces. Covid still exists, and that we deliberately don’t try to count cases any more doesn’t change that.

This is typical of our handling of all problems. We just pretend they don’t exist and won’t have serious consequences if we ignore them. While China is somewhat better, with their hard push on clean tech, their willingness to deflate housing prices and their policies reducing the number of billionaires, they too have ignored Covid.

Ironically this is because the Chinese government IS quite sensitive to public opinion. Zero Covid was the right policy, but it was done stupidly and as a result huge demonstrations occurred and the CPC backed down.

Shutdowns made sense in the early days of Covid. This is public health 101 during a pandemic. But as with everyone else the Chinese did them too late and too long.

The actual solution is the one we used for water borne diseases. We cleaned up the water, and we have to clean up the air. All public buildings and all apartment buildings and condos need filters and UV to clean the air. It’s a huge project, to be sure, but it’s more than doable, for less than we are spending on the insane AI data center push. The result would be a lot less Covid, less disabling and at the same time less flu, colds and other airborne diseases.

It’s simple. We have the technology, and we aren’t doing it. Insanity. Not even in most hospitals. Emergency protocols like masks and isolation make sense, but they are emergency protocols and not for long term use. Find out the vector and find a long term solution to the vector.

This solution was understood as early as 2021. Many voices were raised. Nothing was done.

Our predecessors did what they could. If you remember the old steam and hot water heating systems, you know they usually ran too hot so that people had to open windows to cool down, even in the middle of winter. This was deliberate, the designers wanted those windows open to increase ventilation, because they knew the great post-World War I flu pandemic had been airborne.

We have better tech, and better solutions and we’re just sitting on our thumbs and rotating.

Pathetic.

This site is only viable due to reader donations. If you value it and can, please subscribe or donate.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
57 minutes ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories