plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
19420 stories
·
21 followers

Oh hey! Look, the impacts of such feckless privatisation are conveniently on display at the Federal level. A pilot informs flight passengers that a lack of air traffic controllers has caused their delay. The cause of that ATC shortage is understaffing at the private staffing corporation the government created with the Civil Air Navigation Services Commercialization Act (ANS Act). https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/air-canada-pilot-air-traffic-controller-shortage-1.7544484 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nav_Canada #ONPoli #CanPoli #DoFo

1 Share
Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Trump media group plans to raise $3bn to spend on cryptocurrencies

1 Comment

Premium Digital

€69 per month

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

  • Global news & analysis
  • Expert opinion
  • FT App on Android & iOS
  • FT Edit app
  • FirstFT: the day's biggest stories
  • 20+ curated newsletters
  • Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
  • FT Videos & Podcasts
  • 20 monthly gift articles to share
  • Lex: FT's flagship investment column
  • 15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts
  • FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition
Read the whole story
sarcozona
15 hours ago
reply
“TMTG said in a statement that “apparently the Financial Times has dumb writers listening to even dumber sources” but did not comment further. Representatives for Donald Trump Jr did not respond to requests for comment. A White House spokesperson declined to comment.”
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Countergradient variation in lodgepole pine flowering phenology - UBC Library Open Collections

1 Share
Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

"Hypernormalization" explained

2 Shares
The term has been nicely explained in an Instagram video, and that explanation has been converted to text in a Guardian article this week:
“Hypernormalization” is a heady, $10 word, but it captures the weird, dire atmosphere of the US in 2025.

First articulated in 2005 by scholar Alexei Yurchak to describe the civilian experience in Soviet Russia, hypernormalization describes life in a society where two main things are happening.

The first is people seeing that governing systems and institutions are broken. And the second is that, for reasons including a lack of effective leadership and an inability to imagine how to disrupt the status quo, people carry on with their lives as normal despite systemic dysfunction – give or take a heavy load of fear, dread, denial and dissociation.

“What you are feeling is the disconnect between seeing that systems are failing, that things aren’t working … and yet the institutions and the people in power just are, like, ignoring it and pretending everything is going to go on the way that it has,” Harfoush says in her video.
This is exactly the feeling I have been experiencing for most of this calendar year.
Donald Trump is dismantling government checks and balances in an apparent advance toward a “unitary executive” doctrine that would grant him near-unlimited authority, driving the US toward autocracy. Billionaire tech moguls like Elon Musk are helping the government consolidate power and aggressively reduce the federal workforce. Institutions like the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, which help keep Americans healthy and informed, are being haphazardly diminished.

Globally, once-in-a-lifetime climate disasters, war and the lingering trauma of Covid continue to unfold, while an explosion of generative AI threatens to destabilize how people think, make a living and relate to each other.

For many in the US, Trump 2.0 is having a devastating effect on daily life. For others, the routines of life continue, albeit threaded with mind-altering horrors: scrolling past an AI-generated cartoon of Ice officers arresting immigrants before dinner, or hearing about starving Palestinian families while on a school run.

Hypernormalization captures this juxtaposition of the dysfunctional and mundane.

“Donald Trump is not something new,” Curtis tells me, calling him “the final pantomime product” of the US government, where the powerful are abandoning any pretense of common, inclusive ideals and instead using their positions to settle scores, reward loyalty and hollow out institutions for personal or political gains.  Trump’s US is “just like Yeltsin in Russia in the 1990s – promising a new kind of democracy, but in reality allowing the oligarchs to loot and distort the society”, says Curtis...
My apologies to The Guardian for excerpting so much of their content for this post, but I feel this concept is important to understand, and I feel some relief in knowing I'm not alone:
Naming an experience can be a form of psychological relief. “The worst thing in the world is to feel that you’re the only one who feels this way and that you are going quietly mad and everyone else is in denial,” says Caroline Hickman, a psychotherapist and instructor at the University of Bath specializing in climate anxiety. “That terrifies people. It traumatizes people.”

People who feel the “wrongness” of current conditions acutely may be experiencing some depression and anxiety, but those feelings can be quite rational – not a symptom of poor mental health, alarmism or a lack of proper perspective, Hickman says.

“What we’re really scared of is that the people in power have not got our back and they don’t give a shit about whether we survive or not,” she says...

Marielle Greguski, 32, a New York City-based retail worker and content creator, posted about everyday life feeling “inconsequential” in the face of political crisis. Greguski says the outcome of the 2024 election reminded her that she lives in a “bubble” of progressive values, and that “there’s the other half of people that are not feeling the same energy and frustration and fear”...

When we feel powerless in the face of bigger problems, we “turn to the only thing that we do have the power over, to try and change for the better”, says Curtis – meaning, typically, ourselves. Anxiety and fear can trap us, leading us to spend more time trying to feel better in small, personal ways, like entertainment and self-care, and less time on activism and community engagement.
More at the link.  It's a real gem.  
Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
hannahdraper
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Faultlines

1 Comment and 2 Shares

A short story, and a pattern I wish more people could recognize:

A few years ago somebody sent a letter into a local paper asking, why do groups of Ethiopian men stand around outside every evening, I’m white and anxious (they didn’t actually say that part but c’mon) and I don’t think like it, what’s that about then. And to their credit, the paper did the legwork, talked to a few people from and replied “In that community, people don’t just rush straight home after work; they meet with friends, talk about how they’re doing, share the day’s news, talk local politics and how things are going back home… this how they stay connected.”

After going through all that the author had the wit to say, maybe the important question we should be asking isn’t, why do they do this. Maybe the real question that we should be asking ourselves is why the rest of us don’t do the same.

I think about that a lot. Especially when – after we’ve been through decades of relentless government penury and abdication of responsibility around social and societal infrastructure – politicians start talking about social isolation as a dog whistle for xenophobia.

In the UK they called it “austerity”, I think because of the British total cultural commitment to describing avoidable, self-inflicted misery in terms of ennobling character traits and nationalist pride – do you ever wonder if British cooking is the way it is because the favourite national flavour is just… boot? – but it’s the same neglect all over: when was the last time the city, the state or province or canton or who cares what, when was the last time the government where you live you broke ground on a community center?

Not a shopping mall or coffee shop, but an actual third-space, you are entitled to access here because you’re a person, you can just go and hang out if you want for no reason, you don’t need to pay anything, community centre?

You can’t remember; that’s the pattern.

Neglect and ignore that “the public good” means public social infrastructure and public social spaces, for decades, and then point at anyone who’s trying to do what they can with the approximately nothing they have to make cities and spaces and communities more real, more connected, more beautiful – Ethiopian corner conversations, Caribbean barbecues in parks, teenagers with spray-paint turning bare concrete into art, the list is endless – and blame them for the supposed decay.

We need to recognize this pattern and understand, in our bones, what it means: that when you see somebody blaming immigrants or teenagers or literally anyone else for social failures in a society, when they have their hands on the levers of the most powerful social institutions of that society, what we should all be seeing is somebody who either absolutely sucks at their job or doesn’t think solving those problems should be their job or just doesn’t want to. Malice, incompetence, both, doesn’t matter; bigotry and incompetence go hand in hand everywhere, people whose bigotries keep them from doing their jobs are just people who can’t do their jobs and people who can’t do their jobs shouldn’t get to keep them.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
This behaviour is often criticized as threatening to women. And it is true that when a bunch of dudes are hanging out on the street there’s often more harassment and catcalling. But this is a patriarchy problem not an immigrant problem. If non immigrant dudes were hanging out on street corners, you’d get similar effects in most places. Don’t use me to justify your racism and xenophobia; deal with your sexism.
Epiphyte City
acdha
1 day ago
It’s also notable how in the U.S. the far right has been able to recruit immigrants who they intend to harm by appealing to shared sexism. Downplaying that problem has had disastrous consequences.
sarcozona
1 day ago
Amen.
acdha
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Pockets Gal... or? Pockets Galore

2 Shares

Photo: a toddler wears a pair of classically faded blue jeans. At least three pockets are in the picture; two more lurk 'round back. Why does a baby even need pockets? Babies may not need pockets, but they deserve them!


An open letter to Lands End

Dear Lands End,

I bought beautiful Lands End flannel shirts for my husband and myself last Christmas. They weren't the matchy-matchy ones - which you evidently don't make. His was of a substantial, durable-seeming material, nice buttons, sewn well, and had, oh, at least two front pockets. Mine was also well-made, nice fabric, great comfy styling... and ZERO pockets. Why? I also have two hands, carry all sort of things, and would have loved a place to stow some carryables. I even double-checked the side seam because sometimes they put girl pockets there. Nope. Nothing. (NB: Even your "Boyfriend Shirts" for women don't have pockets!)

Maybe you think that I can use my purse? That capacious tote that sometimes doubles as overnight-bag and survival kit? But I don't carry it with me when I am stacking wood, doing chores and just hanging around the house. Pockets. Pockets are great. Pockets are needed by anyone who needs a shirt. Perhaps you think it is infringing on my femininity or my modesty to place to big patches over my chest region? Really, I don't mind. I don't need your shirts to accentuate my positives, wherever they may be located. 

I need pockets. As many as you can give me.

Sincerely,

A Pocket Gal


If I could count the phones I've dropped and broken because measly little pockets won't hold them! If I could name the things I've misplaced because I "just set them down for a sec while I did something"! If I could get back the dollars that have fallen out of narrow, shallow pockets that were basically pockets-in-name-only! When it starts to hit the old pocket... well. 

What's the big deal?? Women have fought for the vote, for equal pay, for the ability to decide what to do with our own bodies - heck, we're still working on that one! Do women have to fight for the right to have pockets? 

I will send a shout out to my favorite purveyor of stylish clothing for women-of-a-certain-age-who-still-feel-somewhat-young-ish: J Jill - those folks put pockets in all sorts of things! Side pockets, patch pockets, hip pockets, deep back pockets, zip pockets. They've got 'em all. 

In the history of human sartorial advances, I believe that the pocket stands right at the top. Collars? For straight-up cowards! Zippers? Nothing a button can't do. Sleeves? Well, that one's basic. Pockets enabled our prehistoric forbears to carry home berries and nuts, stow some dried protein for laters, and put away that slingshot and rock until they were good and ready. I can only imagine the chaos that reigned before we could carry stuff hands-free. 

So, in the name of all that is holey (pocket pun, get it??), please, please grant me the serenity to use pockets for loose change, the courage to ask for pockets, and the wisdom to know the difference between carefree clothing and careless design. To quote my elder grandson's favorite joke: "Why did the golfer have a hole in his pocket? So that he'd always have a hole-in-one." To that I will add another joke: "Why did the seal carry fish in her mouth? Because she didn't have any pockets." I feel ya, seal, I feel ya.


Read the whole story
sarcozona
1 day ago
reply
Epiphyte City
rocketo
2 days ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories