plant lover, cookie monster, shoe fiend
19593 stories
·
21 followers

Europe’s pledge to spend more on military will hurt climate and social programmes

1 Share

Nato spending plan overlooks risks to security posed by environmental breakdown and social decay, say economists

Europe risks choosing militarism over social and environmental security, economists have warned, as the head of Nato said all 32 members had agreed to increase weapons spending.

Analyses drafted in anticipation of a Nato summit beginning on Tuesday warned of the opportunity cost that higher military spending would pose to the continent’s climate mitigation and social programmes, which are consistently underfunded.

Continue reading...
Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

The Pornocalypse Comes For Furries

1 Share

Explicitly blaming unspecified payment processors (which means Visa or Mastercard or their downstream agents), the fan/subscription platform Fansly (a large OnlyFans competitor that I don’t know much about) just banned furries “in adult contexts.” Specifically, according to 404 Media:

Fansly wrote:

“Anthropomorphic Content – Our payment processing partners classify some anthropomorphic content as simulated bestiality. As a general guideline, Kemonomimi (human-like characters with animal ears/tails) is permitted, but full fursonas, Kemono, and scalie content are prohibited in adult contexts.

Also hit by the recent pornocalypse ban-stick on Fansly were hypnosis and mind-control fetishists, catfight/wrestling enthusiasts, and public/outdoor/exhibitionist sex/nudity material.

Many Fansly users feel specifically betrayed by the promises they were made when they came to Fansly in the first place:

In 2021, OnlyFans announced that it would ban “sexually-explicit conduct” from the site, citing payment processor pressure. It reversed the decision days later, after widespread public backlash. Fansly said at the time that it was receiving “4,000 applications an hour” from creators looking to move to the site in the days after OnlyFans said it was banning sexually-explicit content.

“Thank you, we won’t let you down,” Fansly wrote on Twitter.

I’m sure that promise was sincerely meant at the time. But the pornocalypse comes for us all.


View this post in its original location at ErosBlog: The Sex Blog.
If you are reading this anywhere but in a feed reader, it has been scraped without permission. Feed obtained by: (34.32.195.75)

Similar Sex Blogging:

The post The Pornocalypse Comes For Furries appeared first on ErosBlog.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

The hidden link between screen time, sleep, and teen health | STAT

1 Share

With all the discussion around the adolescent mental health crisis, a prime suspect has gone relatively unnoticed: sleep. 

I have treated thousands of youths struggling with mental illness over the past 25 years. As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I have observed a remarkable shift in their everyday habits thanks to screen time. A 2021 report from Common Sense Media found that people between the ages of 13 and 18 spend almost nine hours a day looking at screens.

These additional hours of screen time have come at the expense of a variety of other activities: socializing in person, chores, employment, reading books, physical activity, and most importantly, sleep. Studies confirm that teens now sleep less than before smartphones took over our lives, while their biological need for sleep has remained unchanged. Two-thirds of adolescents fail to get the minimum eight hours their minds need on most school nights, with Black and male teens sleeping the least. According to the National Science Foundation, 70% of American high school students get less than eight hours of sleep per night, or less time than they spend looking at screens.

Dozens of studies have proven how screen habits lead to poor sleep. Screen time impairs sleep in five ways.

First, kids stay up later because they prefer screen media over going to bed. Second, video games and social media increase autonomic arousal (it riles them up), delaying sleep onset even after the device is turned off. Third, many teens lie in bed during daylight hours to engage with their phone or tablet, deconditioning the body to fall asleep in bed when they want to. Fourth, notifications — typically messages from insomniac peers looking for company — often wake teens from sleep at night. Others plan middle-of-the-night awakenings to go online undisturbed by parents who assume they’re asleep. Fifth, the blue light emitted by screens at night tricks the suprachiasmatic nucleus into believing it is daytime, further disrupting a teen’s sensitive sleep-wake cycle. 

Sleep-deprived adolescents sometimes fall asleep in school, but more often, nap after school and crash on the weekend, temporarily meeting their sleep debt but failing to undo most of the related damage. That damage is considerable. Sleep deprivation impairs learning considerably, strongly predicting declining grades. It also predisposes youth to depression, anxiety, suicidality, and obesity. Multiple studies confirm that the relationship between screen time and poor mental health is related to its negative effect on sleep. The lack of sleep that results from teens’ nighttime social media and video game engagement may be the most important single cause of the adolescent mental health crisis. 

Why then, does adolescent sleep receive so little attention in the news media? One reason is that the effect of insomnia on mental health is insidious. Teens and their parents often fail to connect an onset of depression and anxiety with a decline in their sleep habits. Many depressed youths value time spent on screen entertainment late at night because the entertainment provides temporary relief from their growing daily distress. They are unaware, though, that their solution ultimately exacerbates the problem. 

A decade ago, it was not uncommon for teens with insomnia to ask me to prescribe sleep medication. More often than not, removing screens from their room at night resolved their insomnia without requiring pills.

But increasingly I find teens don’t really want to give sufficient time to sleep. They prefer nighttime smartphone use to a reasonable bedtime, refusing parental rules and even sleep medication lest it interfere with their favorite activity. When I was working with a boy who would stay up all night in his room playing video games, I suggested to his mother that she move his gaming console into the living room. She did it, but to my surprise, he was sleeping no better. Then she clarified what was happening: “He never goes into his room anymore, just spends all night gaming in the living room.” 

While screens may seem inseparable from modern adolescence, we must not ignore the mounting evidence that nighttime screen use exacts a terrible toll on mental health. Teens must be educated about the importance of adequate sleep, and how screens can get in the way. Many lack the insight, perspective, and willpower to manage screen time on their own, but parents can help by setting a bedtime that allows for nine hours of sleep per night and restricting all access to screens until morning. Often this means banning screens from the bedroom completely, charging phones in the parents’ bedroom overnight, and deactivating Wi-Fi automatically each evening. Parents might bristle at this because they want to use their devices, too, but this offers a chance for parents to set an example by moderating their own screen habits. Prioritizing sleep will help children and teens lead healthy lives in this media-saturated world. Sometimes the best therapy of all is a good night’s rest. 

This essay is adapted from a chapter written by Paul Weigle and edited by Naomi Schaefer Riley and Sally Satel in the edited volume “Mind the Children: How to Think About the Youth Mental Health Collapse.”

Paul Weigle, M.D., is a board-certified child and adolescent psychiatrist, associate medical director at Natchaug Hospital, and associate professor of psychiatry at UConn School of Medicine.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

European tourist denied entry to US over JD Vance meme on his phone

1 Share

A visitor from Norway was reportedly denied entry to the United States after border officers found an unflattering meme of Vice President JD Vance on it. Mads Mikkelsen, 21, told his hometown newspaper that be was harassed by officers before being deported.

[He] claimed the officers then threatened him with a $5,000 fine or five years in prison if he refused to give the password to his mobile phone. The guards reportedly found a meme on the device’s camera roll showing US vice president JD Vance with a bald, egg-shaped head.Mikkelsen said after discovering the image the Officers Beforeities sent him home to Norway the same day.

U.S. officials warn visitors that they must not only hand over their devices at the border for inspection, but also access to their social media accounts. It’s not in the official guidance, but do remember to say thank you as well.…’ Rob Beschizza via Boing Boing



Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

Trump Declares War on the Birds and the Bees

1 Share

No, not those birds and bees, ya randy bastids!

During the 2024 election, I repeatedly POASTED something along the lines of “If Trump wins, he will break things that most people didn’t even know could be broken.” With that as prelude, I give you the birds (boldface mine):

If the Trump administration gets its way, we won’t have much hope of learning more. The White House’s 2026 budget would end the annual North American Breeding Bird Survey and the Bird Banding Laboratory, programs under the U.S. Geological Survey’s Ecosystems Mission Area.

For more than a century, bird studies have operated as follows: Scientists band birds and wait to see what happens to them. Since 1920, the Bird Banding Laboratory has worked with Canadian scientists to run the North American Bird Banding Program. More than 77 million birds have been banded in the United States and Canada; more than 5 million of those birds have been “reencountered,” or found and logged by someone later on.

Bird banding might seem low-tech, but the program has provided some of the best information we have about certain species. It’s how we know about Wisdom, a Laysan albatross that lives on Midway Atoll and is the oldest confirmed wild bird in the world. She was banded in 1956 and still incubating eggs as of last year, at 74 years old. Banding is how agencies track the health of waterfowl populations and set hunting limits and seasons for the birds at sustainable levels. Wood ducks were hunted to such an extent that they were close to extinction when the North American Bird Banding Program started. Today, there are an estimated 4 million of them, and the population is increasing. Hunters are some of the most frequent loggers of banded birds.

Who would want to end such a program? If we don’t track a bird species, we’ll have no idea when it’s in jeopardy. Without the citizen-reported data, it becomes much harder to prove that a marsh where someone wants to build a parking lot or a resort or a golf course is actually vital habitat. The bird-banding program is just one part of the USGS’s Ecosystems Mission Area; the program’s $292.9 million budget in 2025 went to programs that monitor invasive species, track diseases such as avian influenza and look for ways to help ecosystems adapt to climate change. All of this is slated for defunding in the White House’s proposed 2026 budget. Hard to see how that makes America great again.

And the bees (boldface mine):

Droege, a slender 66-year-old who wears his long white hair in two neat French braids, is one of the world’s leading native bee experts, devoted to tracking and identifying the insects and the plants they help maintain. And for the first time in its more than two-decade-long history, the future of the bee lab is imperiled.

The Trump administration’s 2026 budget proposal calls for the defunding of the bee lab and other federally funded wildlife research efforts. Bracing for these cuts, priorities have shifted for the the lab, which has collected and identified more than 1 million specimens of pollinators, hundreds of thousands of which are slotted away in its modest walls. Active field work is on pause. No new research projects have begun.

Droege studies native bees, the types of pollinators that only live in the wild, as opposed to honeybees, which are farmed and bred for profit. Entomologists stress that honeybees and native bees are different — sort of like farmed chickens and wild birds. But they can be exposed to the same threats, and there are signs that both are in trouble….

Commercial and native bees can fall victim to the same hazards, including pesticides, drought and environmental pollutants, experts said. Droege is one of the only people in the country who can distinguish most native bees from their thousands of relatives — research that helps track the insects and the plants and crops they maintain.

Native bees pollinate an estimated 80 percent of flowering plants around the world, and understanding the pollinators’ behavior helps us sustain the production of our food. Forests, prairies, grasslands, deserts and wetlands rely on bees to maintain their unique biodiversity. The more we track bees, the better we can understand the role different species play in the pollination of crops such as pumpkins in the Mid-Atlantic, apples in Pennsylvania, tomatoes in California and blueberries in Oregon.

Hollis Woodard, an assistant professor focused on native bees at the University of California at Riverside, said the lab is “essentially irreplaceable.” She uses its data for her work researching native bees nearly every day. “If we lose this facility and we lose these people, the hit we’re going to take to tracking bees and trying to conserve them would be absolutely devastating,” Woodard said…

The lab’s budget is small. Droege said it includes his salary and that of his sole employee, a lab manager hired about four years ago. Otherwise, he said, they have received anywhere from $3,000 to $12,000 annually from the government. But it falls under a larger federal biological research effort that the Trump administration has proposed eliminating as of Oct. 1.

The White House wants to eliminate grants and research programs that “duplicate other Federal research programs and focus on social agendas (e.g., climate change) to instead focus on achieving dominance in energy and critical minerals,” according to its proposal, which calls for cutting $564 million from the Interior Department’s U.S. Geological Survey. The agency runs the bee lab and other programs that monitor animals including birds, butterflies and bats…

“Sam’s whole role and the role of that lab is to be in service to the American people,” said Mace Vaughan, the director of the pollinator and agriculture biodiversity program at the Xerces Society, an insect conservation organization. “They’re like a hub in a wheel supporting identification, training, research, data sharing.”

The lab has provided data for more than 800 papers over the last 20 years. It receives and identifies bees from universities and hobbyists alike. It takes the time to write identification manuals and run the sort of tests that Droege quips “will not get you tenure,” such as: Which brand of soap works best in a bee trap?

Many people who have come through my lab have either been directly trained in bee identification by Sam Droege or have used his lab’s expertise to verify species IDs,” said Scott McArt, who heads a pollinator lab at Cornell and is an assistant professor of pollinator health in the university’s department of entomology.

Is this a crisis equivalent to the slow evolution of ICE into Trump’s personal praetorian or any other number of fascist* policies? No, but it’s still stupid and wasteful, as once you destroy things like this, you can’t get them back: there’s no way to recreate the missing data or expertise, they’re just gone forever.

And, as always, these are just smaller facets of a larger, fascist and totalitarian piece.

Read the whole story
sarcozona
4 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete

The 2025 NSF GRFP awards, now with double the bias

1 Share

Science magazine reports a new skew in the awarding of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF GRFP) awards.

No awards in life sciences. Zip. Zero. Zilch.

I used to joke that there was no Nobel prize for biology. Now it seems there’s no GRFPs, either. The awards are heavily skewed toward computer science, particularly artificial intelligence. 

And let’s not forget that the number of awards was cut in half.

I strongly suspected that the awards were probably heavily skewed to fancy, well funded research universities and showed little love to the larger public university systems, which has been going on for as long as I know. But I had to poke the wound and look at the award data. Currently easy to download into an Excel file.

I  posted a super quick check on the numbers in a Bluesky thread.

Harvard University, with about 25,000 students total (many who would not be eligible) gets 25 GRFP awards.

Meanwhile, the entire University of Texas system, with about 250,000 students total (again, many not eligible) gets 30.

Embattled Columbia University, about 33,000 students total, gets 29 GRFP awards.

Arizona State University, with over 183,000 students total, gets 8 GRFP awards.

MIT, which is tiny, gets 82 GRFP awards. They always get a lot of awards, but the number of awards per student has jumped. Back in 2022, MIT had 83 awards, but keep in mind that because the number of awards were halved this year, the 82 award count this year is proportionately much heftier than the 83 awards in 2022.

The University of California system, which is gigantic, gets about 147 GRFP awards. (I say “about” because I just searched the Excel spreadsheet for “University of California,” and I know some universities in that system don’t follow that naming convention.) 

Yes, I could try to figure out student enrolment numbers better so they might more accurately reflect the population of students eligible for GRFP awards, but there is no way that the overall trend would budge.

I do not believe talent to so concentrated in such a small number of institutions. It’s a Matthew effect.

A recent article by Craig McClain is also worth pointing out here. McClain points out that the current academic training system makes it extraordinarily difficult to be a career scientist unless you have money to burn. The way they NSF GRFP program runs contributes to this problem.

References

McClain CR. 2025. Too poor to science: How wealth determines who succeeds in STEM. PLoS Biology 23(6): e3003243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003243 

Related posts

The NSF GRFP problem, 2022 edition  (Links to my older rants – er, posts – about this award contained within)

External links

Prestigious NSF graduate fellowship tilts toward AI and quantum 

Read the whole story
sarcozona
5 hours ago
reply
Epiphyte City
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories